ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1726

A Pregnancy Planning Quality Score to Assess a Systematic Intervention to Improve Pregnancy Planning for Women with SLE

Catherine Sims1, Amanda Eudy1, Jayanth Doss1, Lisa Criscione-Schreiber2, Kai Sun2, Rebecca Sadun1, Jennifer Rogers2 and Megan Clowse3, 1Duke University, Durham, NC, 2Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 3Duke University, Chapel Hill, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Patient reported outcomes, pregnancy, quality of care, race/ethnicity, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders Poster (1711–1731)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: The safest pregnancies for women with SLE coincide with periods of disease quiescence maintained by pregnancy-compatible medications. In the US, Black women are more likely to experience unplanned pregnancy and experience higher rates of maternal and infant morbidity, possibly due to inequitable provider-patient planning discussions. The HOP-STEP Pregnancy Planning handout, which is aligned with the ACR Reproductive Health Guidelines, was created to facilitate pregnancy planning discussions between rheumatologists and their SLE patients. We have assessed the systematic ascertainment of pregnancy interest and pregnancy planning discussions in a lupus clinic to identify its impact on pregnancy planning quality and equitable care.

Methods: All women age 18-44 in a prospective registry who met ACR or SLICC criteria for SLE completed an intake form for each visit which included 1) whether she wanted to get pregnant in the next year and 2) contraceptive use. A woman was identified as ‘not medically ready for pregnancy’ if she was on a teratogen, had proteinuria ≥ 500 mg or a physician’s global assessment (PGA) ≥ 1.5. Race was self-reported. We identified 10 Pregnancy-Planning Quality (PPQ) Measures, awarding one-point for each measure. If a woman interested in pregnancy was seen multiple times between 2/2018-12/2019, her score accounted for the accrual of points over subsequent visits.

Results: Pregnancy interest was reported by 26 of 152 (17%) women. Of those interested in pregnancy, the average age was 32.7 years (SD 5.5); 65% identified as Black and 15% as Hispanic. Fifteen patients (58%; 10 Black, 5 non-Black) were not medically ready for pregnancy across visits, with 10 taking a teratogen, 4 with proteinuria, and 7 with a PGA ≥ 1.5. Two women on teratogens were able to switch to pregnancy-compatible medications during this period.

There were no differences in PPQ Scores between Black (7.2) and non-Black (7.4) patients (Table 1). All but one visit included a discussion of pregnancy planning, and the majority of women were given instructions to continue their appropriate medications in pregnancy.

As of 4/2021, 10 women had 12 pregnancies in the follow-up period; 9 (75%) of these were planned and occurred when the patient was medically ready to conceive. One was unplanned and conceived in the midst of a severe cutaneous flare; two were conceived by the same woman when she was taking MMF. Five women had not conceived due to ongoing teratogen use or disease activity. Seven women no longer desired pregnancy due to personal, non-medical reasons.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that systematic, patient-reported measures of pregnancy interest and proactive pregnancy planning are feasible in an academic specialty clinic. More than half of all women were not medically ready for a safe pregnancy. The risks of poor pregnancy outcomes can be mitigated by addressing plans for pregnancy. Within our study population the majority of pregnancies were planned. The non-pregnant patients cite social issues, medications, and ongoing disease as reasons to not pursue pregnancy. This method shows promise for improving current clinic protocols regarding pregnancy planning.

Table 1. Cumulative Data Summarizing Factors Contributing to Lack of Medical Readiness for Pregnancy and Assessment of Pregnancy Planning Amongst Women with SLE


Disclosures: C. Sims, UCB Pharma, 5; A. Eudy, NIH NCATS Award Number 1KL2TR002554, 5, Pfizer, 5, Exagen, 5; J. Doss, Pfizer, 5; L. Criscione-Schreiber, None; K. Sun, None; R. Sadun, None; J. Rogers, Exagen, Inc, 5; M. Clowse, UCB Pharma, 2, Pfizer, 5, GSK, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sims C, Eudy A, Doss J, Criscione-Schreiber L, Sun K, Sadun R, Rogers J, Clowse M. A Pregnancy Planning Quality Score to Assess a Systematic Intervention to Improve Pregnancy Planning for Women with SLE [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-pregnancy-planning-quality-score-to-assess-a-systematic-intervention-to-improve-pregnancy-planning-for-women-with-sle/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-pregnancy-planning-quality-score-to-assess-a-systematic-intervention-to-improve-pregnancy-planning-for-women-with-sle/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology