ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2343

A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Dose Effectiveness of Intradermal Injections of Purified Apis Mellifera Toxin to Improve Pain and Physical Function in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Douglas R. Schumacher1, Anna Jakubowska2 and Christopher M.H. Kim3, 1Radiant Research, Columbus, OH, 2Apimeds, Inc., Jungwongu, Seongnam, Gyeonggido, Korea, The Republic of, 3CHA University, Bundanggu, Seongnam, Gyeongghido, Korea, The Republic of

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Biologic agents, Inflammation, Knee, osteoarthritis and pain

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspects - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: This Phase 2a/b trial evaluated the safety and dose effectiveness of honeybee toxin (purified Apis melliferatoxin) injections to improve pain and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.  

Methods: Eligible patients were ≥35 years (men and women), with OA in one or both knees (Grade 1-3) and with pain symptoms ≥4 on a visual analog scale (VAS) after medication washout. Eligible patients were randomized to histamine controls: 2.75 μg (n=4), 8.25 μg (n=3), or 27.5 μg (n=4); or to honeybee toxin: 100 μg (n=9), 300 μg (n=10) or 1000 μg (n=10). Patients received 10 intradermal injections (5 in each knee) with syringes randomly filled with control, toxin or saline depending on treatment assignment. Injection sites were randomly targeted to the OA knee because honeybee toxin has systemic effectiveness as well as local activity. Safety evaluated any significant adverse events (AEs) including immediate hypersensitivity reactions from treatment after a negative honeybee toxin skin test (50 μg). Efficacy endpoints were assessed at Predose (Day 1), and Follow-Up Visits (Day 7 and 14) for pain and physical function using subscores from the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Version LK 3.1, as well as for patient global assessment (PGA) and physician global assessment (PhGA).

Results: The majority of patients (33/40, 82.5%) reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) that were primarily mild to moderate injection site reactions (discomfort, edema, induration, pain, pruritus, urticaria and warmth). All injection site reactions resolved by Day 14. There were no discontinuations or SAEs associated with the honeybee toxin doses, and there were no changes in laboratory parameters, vital signs, or electrocardiograms. At Day 7, WOMAC pain subscores showed an improvement in pain relative to control for all three honeybee toxin doses but not significantly; i.e., least square mean (LSM) difference from control: -2.23, -2.27 and ‑2.11, respectively, for the 100 µg, 300 µg and 1000 µg doses; p=0.2880. Physical function subscores, however, showed significant improvement versus control at Day 7: -11.27 (p=0.0374), -11.38 (p=0.0308) and -10.35 (p=0.0541), respectively, for the honeybee toxin doses. Further, at Day 7, a significant majority of all patients treated with honeybee toxin (66.5%; p=0.0177) assessed their condition (PGA) as being “very good or good” whereas 90% of patients in the control group perceived their condition as being “fair or poor.” The PhGA was generally consistent with the PGA. Regarding Day 14 efficacy assessments, most were consistent with Day 7, however, the improvements among the doses were not as significant.

Conclusion: The honeybee toxin regimens resulted in consistent improvement in pain, physical function, and global health perceptions in patients with knee OA. The safety profile raised no concerns or issues related to treatment. The results of this Phase 2 trial provide sufficient clinical evidence to justify investigating the safety and efficacy of honeybee toxin (purified Apis mellifera toxin) for treating patients with OA pain and inflammation in a Phase 3 trial.


Disclosure: D. R. Schumacher, honeybee toxin (purified Apis mellifera toxin), 2; A. Jakubowska, honeybee toxin (purified Apis mellifera toxin), 3; C. M. H. Kim, honeybee toxin (purified Apis mellifera toxin), 4.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Schumacher DR, Jakubowska A, Kim CMH. A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Dose Effectiveness of Intradermal Injections of Purified Apis Mellifera Toxin to Improve Pain and Physical Function in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-2-multi-center-randomized-double-blind-active-controlled-parallel-group-study-to-evaluate-the-safety-and-dose-effectiveness-of-intradermal-injections-of-purified-apis-mellifera-toxin/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-phase-2-multi-center-randomized-double-blind-active-controlled-parallel-group-study-to-evaluate-the-safety-and-dose-effectiveness-of-intradermal-injections-of-purified-apis-mellifera-toxin/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology