ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1745

A Novel Method for Predicting 1-Year Retention of Abatacept Using Machine Learning Techniques

Rieke Alten1, Claire Behar2, Christine Boileau2, Pierre Merckaert2, Ebenezer Afari2, Virginie Vannier-Moreau3, Sean Connolly3, Yedid Elbez2, Pierre-Antoine Juge4 and Karissa Lozenski3, 1Schlosspark-Klinik, Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany, 2Excelya, Boulogne-Billancourt, France, 3Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ, 4Université de Paris, Service de Rhumatologie Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, AP-HP, Paris, France

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Biologicals, clinical trial, informatics, rheumatoid arthritis, Statistical methods

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster IV: Lifespan of a Disease

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: In the ACTION (NCT02109666) study, using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models, patient (pt) global assessment of pain, country, reason for stopping last biologic, number of prior biologic treatments (txs), abatacept (ABA) monotherapy, RF/anti-CCP status, previous neoplasms, psychiatric disorders and cardiac disorders were identified as predictors of 1-year retention to ABA tx.1 The objective of our study was to use machine learning as an innovative and complementary approach in order to identify pts with 1-year ABA retention.

Methods: Supervised learning was used for classification. A binary variable was used where retention=1 and no retention=0. Retention was defined as tx for >365 days or ≤365 days in pts who achieved remission or major clinical response. The number of variables identified and used in the models is shown in Figure 1. A subset of features was selected to prevent under-fitting or over-fitting. Label and OneHot encoding were applied for categorical variables and MinMax scaling was applied to convert all continuous variables to the same scale. The models tested for predictive performance were: logistic regression, support vector machine, naïve Bayes, decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting and multi-layer perceptron. For each model, a recursive feature elimination with cross validation was applied. For the best performing model (gradient boosting), the database was divided into two sets: a training/validation set (n=2021) and a test set (n=329). Accuracy was defined as the number of correct predictions divided by the total number of predictions. Precision, recall and F1-score were estimated for predictions on both retention and no retention and were then weight-averaged to obtain overall performance scores. The importance score of each variable was estimated.

Results: In total, 2350 pts included from May 2008 to December 2013 had a mean retention rate of 59.3% at 1 year. The gradient boosting classifier model had the best prediction testing accuracy (67%) and was the most interpretable model for feature importance (Table 1). The importance score for each predictor did not describe a linear correlation with retention or directionality; rather, the higher the score, the more important the variable for retention prediction. Predictive information was shared between all 51 variables; 8 of which overlapped with those identified in the Cox regression model.1 The five most influencing variables were the duration of previous biologic DMARDs, pt global pain assessment, RA duration, physician global disease activity assessment and HAQ-DI.

Conclusion: The gradient-boosting model identified predictors of retention in addition to those identified by multivariable Cox regression models in ACTION.1 The models and predictors identified could be further improved by including other RA datasets. Machine learning offers a complementary approach to biostatistics and may lead to better identification of pts with RA, and their tx retention, hence supporting personalized, clinical decision making in a real-world setting.

Reference

  1. Alten R, et al. RMD Open 2017;3:e000538.

 Medical writing: Claire Line (Caudex)


Disclosure: R. Alten, Pfizer, 2, 8, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 2, Novartis, 2, AbbVie, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; C. Behar, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 9; C. Boileau, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 9; P. Merckaert, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 9; E. Afari, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 9; V. Vannier-Moreau, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 3; S. Connolly, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 1, 3, 4; Y. Elbez, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 9; P. Juge, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 5; K. Lozenski, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Alten R, Behar C, Boileau C, Merckaert P, Afari E, Vannier-Moreau V, Connolly S, Elbez Y, Juge P, Lozenski K. A Novel Method for Predicting 1-Year Retention of Abatacept Using Machine Learning Techniques [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-novel-method-for-predicting-1-year-retention-of-abatacept-using-machine-learning-techniques/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/a-novel-method-for-predicting-1-year-retention-of-abatacept-using-machine-learning-techniques/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology