ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2688

Single cell RNA-seq immune profiling of blood samples from a psoriatic disease clinical trial reveals a CD4 T cell population associated with response to IL-23 blockade

Kathryne Marks1, Anina Sun2, Ifeoluwakiisi Adejoorin1, Lourdes Perez Chada3, Anna Perillo4, Leanne Barrett2, Michael Garshick5, James Krueger6, Joseph Merola7, Marcelo DiCarli2, Deepak Rao1 and Brittany Weber8, 1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Brigham And Women's Hospital, Boston, 3Harvard Medical School, Wayland, MA, 4The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA, New York, NY, 5NYU Langone Health, Tenafly, NJ, 6Rockefeller University, New York, NY, 7UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 8Brigham and Women's Hospital, DEDHAM, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Biologicals, Biomarkers, immunology, Psoriatic arthritis, TH17 Cells

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2025

Title: Abstracts: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment II: Pathogenesis, Exercise, and Dietary Interventions (2687–2692)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:45AM-12:00PM

Background/Purpose: The use of IL-23 inhibitors (IL-23i) for psoriatic diseases resulted in significant improvement in disease symptoms for many patients. Whether any blood immune cell profiles can predict clinical response to IL-23 blockade has not been examined, however. Here, we applied single cell RNA-seq immune profiling to blood samples from 27 PsO/A patients to identify cellular features associated with response to IL-23 blockade by tildrakizumab in the setting of a clinical trial.

Methods: PBMCs from psoriasis (n = 21) and psoriatic arthritis (n=6) patients were collected as part of the MINIMA study (NCT04271540) at Brigham and Women’s Hospital before (following washout) and after 24 weeks of treatment with tildrakizumab. Patients currently had moderate or severe PsO. PASI scores were recorded before and after treatment, and % improvement of 50% or 70% was calculated. 48% of participants had a PASI improvement of 70% or greater, and 78% PASI improvement of 50% or greater. Table 1 denotes the disease characteristics and demographics of the patients. Single-cell RNA sequencing was conducted on baseline samples before treatment and on follow-up samples, followed by QC, batch correction, and unsupervised clustering. Analyses were performed using Wilcoxon paired tests, covarying neighborhood analysis (CNA), mixed effects association of single cell analysis (MASC), and differential gene expression analysis.

Results: We compared baseline samples from patients with greater or less than 70% improvement to identify baseline immune features associated with response. Assessment of PBMCs at a broad level did not reveal associations of any major immune cell populations with better or worse response to IL-23i. We then focused on T cell populations likely to be affected by IL-23i especially IL-23R+ T cells (Fig 1). The IL23R+ CD4 T cell had phenotypes consistent with Th17 and Th1 cells, including expression of IFNG, CXCR3, and IL17A, CCR6 and RORC. As a whole, the proportion of these cells in blood did not change following IL-23i. Further subcluster analysis of the IL23R+ CD4 T cell clusters revealed an association of a subcluster of cells with 70% clinical improvement and a separate subcluster of cells associated with lesser clinical improvement (Fig 2). Response-associated CD4+ T cells had a gene signature which corresponded to pathogenic Th17 cells (Hu et al, Nat. Commun. 2017). Additionally, patients with improvement >50% had higher expression of CCL5 and STAT1 in the IL23R+ CD4 T cells. To understand relevance of these cells to cells that are expanded in psoriasis skin, we applied a gene module score of genes associated with IFNg+ IL-17A+ cells from psoriasis skin (Kim et al, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 2021). This gene score was also higher in the response-associated cluster.

Conclusion: We have identified a subset of CD4+ T cells whose abundance in circulation before treatment is associated with response to IL-23i in skin disease severity. This T cell population demonstrates transcriptomic features that correspond to those expanded in psoriasis lesional skin. These results suggest that cellular features detectable in blood may be informative in predicting clinical response to IL-23 blockade.

Supporting image 1Table 1. Description of patients included in the scRNAseq from the MINIMA trial.

Supporting image 2Figure 1. A) scRNAseq of PBMCs from IL-23i-treated patients, including cells from baseline (pre-treatment) and week 24 post-treatment samples (~136K cells). B) Mixed effects association of single cell analysis demonstrates a lack of association of PBMC clusters with pre- or post-IL-23i. C) CD4 T cells subset from PBMCs. D) IL23R, IL17A, and IFNexpression in CD4 T cells.

Supporting image 3Figure 2. A) Subcluster of CD4+IL23R+ clusters. B) MASC analysis of pre-treatment samples demonstrating CD4+IL23R+ subclusters associated with baseline (pre-treatment) or week 24 (post-treatment). C) Module scores of genes that predict Th17 cell pathogenicity and genes highly expressed in psoriasis lesional skin. Both scores are higher in the better improvement-associated cluster than the lesser improvement-associated cluster. D) Mean expression of CCL5 and STAT1 in pre-treatment samples is higher in those who have greater than 50% improvement from IL-23i at week 24.


Disclosures: K. Marks: None; A. Sun: None; I. Adejoorin: None; L. Perez Chada: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 6, Takeda, 2; A. Perillo: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Allergan, 2, 6, Almirall, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Aristea, 2, 6, Artax Biopharma, 2, 5, 6, Avillion, 5, Biogen Idec, 2, 5, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, 6, Bruxelles Biopharma, 5, Calliditas, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Escalier, 2, 6, Exicure, 5, Immunotherapeutics, 2, 6, Incyte, 2, 5, 6, Innovaderm, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Kymera Therapeutics, 2, 6, Kyowa Kirin, 2, 5, 6, MC2 Therapeutics, 2, 6, Merck, 2, 6, MoonLake, 2, 6, Novan, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Nuvig Therapeutics, 2, 6, ONO-Pharma, 5, Oruka Therapeutics, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Provectus, 5, Regeneron, 5, Sanofi, 2, 6, SUDO Bio, 5, Sun Pharma, 2, 6, Takeda, 2, 5, 6, Target-Derm, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6, UNION Therapeutics, 2, 6, Valeant, 2, 6, Ventyx, 2, 6, Vitae Pharmaceuticals, 5; L. Barrett: None; M. Garshick: Agepha, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, 2; J. Krueger: AbbVie, Allergan, Almirall, Amgen, Artax, 2, AbbVie, Amgen, Artax Biopharma, Avillion, 5, Aristea, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Calliditas, CSL Behring, Eli Lilly, Escalier, Evommune, Incyte, 2, Bruxelles Biopharma, Exicure,Innovaderm, 5, Eli Lilly, Escalier, Evommune, Incyte, 2, Incyte, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Eli Lilly, 5, Janssen, Kymera Therapeutics, Kyowa Kirin, 2, MC2 Therapeutics, Merck, MoonLake, 2, Novan, Novartis, ONO-Pharma, Pfizer, 5, Novartis, NuvigTherapeutics, Oruka Therapeutics, 2, Pfizer, Sanofi, Schrodinger, Sun Pharma, 2, Provectus, Regeneron, SUDO Bio ,Takeda, 5, Takeda, Target- Derm, UCB, UNION Therapeutics, 2, UCB, Vitae Pharmaceuticals, 5, Valeant, Ventyx, 2; J. Merola: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 12, Investigator, Amgen, 2, 12, Investigator, Arena, 2, Avotres, 2, Biogen, 2, 12, Investigator, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 12, Investigator, Celgene, 2, Dermavant, 2, 12, Investigator, Eli Lilly, 2, 12, Investigator, EMD Serono, 2, Janssen, 2, 12, Investigator, Leo Pharma, 2, 12, Investigator, Merck/MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, 12, Investigator, Pfizer, 2, 12, Investigator, Regeneron, 2, 12, Investigator, Sanofi, 2, 12, Investigator, Sun Pharma, 2, 12, Investigator, UCB, 2, 12, Investigator; M. DiCarli: Bayer, 2, Gilead, 5, Janssen, 2, Spectrum, 5; D. Rao: Abbvie, 6, Aditum, 2, AnaptysBio, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Biogen, 2, Dragonfly, 2, Epana, 1, HiFiBio Therapeutics, 2, Janssen, 5, Merck/MSD, 2, 5, Site Tx, 2; B. Weber: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, 2, Novo nordisk, 2, Novo Nordisk, 2, Oruka, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Marks K, Sun A, Adejoorin I, Perez Chada L, Perillo A, Barrett L, Garshick M, Krueger J, Merola J, DiCarli M, Rao D, Weber B. Single cell RNA-seq immune profiling of blood samples from a psoriatic disease clinical trial reveals a CD4 T cell population associated with response to IL-23 blockade [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/single-cell-rna-seq-immune-profiling-of-blood-samples-from-a-psoriatic-disease-clinical-trial-reveals-a-cd4-t-cell-population-associated-with-response-to-il-23-blockade/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/single-cell-rna-seq-immune-profiling-of-blood-samples-from-a-psoriatic-disease-clinical-trial-reveals-a-cd4-t-cell-population-associated-with-response-to-il-23-blockade/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology