ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2600

Deconstructing Lupus Nephritis Kidney Tissue at Single-Cell Resolution

Nicholas Sugiarto1, Michelle Curtis2, Siddarth Gurajala2, Thomas Eisenhaure3, Qian Xiao4, Joseph Mears5, Arnon Arazi6, Paul Hoover7, Celine Berthier8, Saori Sakaue9, Andrea Fava10, David Hildeman11, E. Steve Woodle12, Brad Rovin13, Jennifer Barnas14, Maria Dall'Era15, Chaim Putterman16, Diane Kamen17, Maureen McMahon18, Jennifer Grossman19, Kenneth Kalunian20, Jeffrey Hodgin21, Fernanda Payan Schober22, Mariko Ishimori23, Michael Weisman23, William Apruzzese24, Joel Guthridge25, Michael Brenner26, Jennifer Anolik27, David Wofsy28, Judith James25, Deepak Rao7, Anne Davidson29, Michelle Petri30, Jill Buyon31, Nir Hacohen32, Betty Diamond33 and Soumya Raychaudhuri7, 1Harvard Medical School, Brookline, MA, 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, 3Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, 4Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 5Michigan University, Ann Arbor, MI, 6Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Acton, MA, 7Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 8University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 9University of Washington, Yokohama, Japan, 10Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 11Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, 12UC Health, Cincinnati, 13The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 14University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 15Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 16Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Safed, Israel, 17Medical University of South Carolina, Johns Island, SC, 18UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 19UCLA, Sherman Oaks, CA, 20UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 21University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 22TTUHSC, El Paso, TX, 23Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 24Pfizer, Boston, 25Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 26Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Newton, MA, 27University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 28University of California San Francisco, SF, CA, 29Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, 30Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Timonium, MD, 31NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 32Broad Institute of MIT Harvard, Cambridge, MA, 33The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, Disease Activity, Lupus nephritis, macrophages, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: Abstracts: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Etiology and Pathogenesis (2597–2602)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 1:45PM-2:00PM

Background/Purpose: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a heterogeneous disease driven by diverse immune and tissue cell types. We defined the cell states in the tissue and blood and tested their association with histopathological indices.

Methods: We obtained 538K single-cell and 143K single-nuclear profiles from kidney biopsies of 156 LN patients and 30 controls from pre-implantation transplant biopsies. We also obtained 327K single-cell blood profiles from a subset of 119 cases and 19 controls (Figure 1). All LN patients were >18 years, had urine protein/creatinine ratio >0.5 at biopsy, and were International Society of Nephrology (ISN) class III, IV, V, or combined III or IV with V.

Results: We built an atlas of kidney tissue cell types in LN encompassing 55 immune and 36 tissue states. Integrating tissue immune single cell data with blood data enabled classification of tissue-specific immune cell states (Figure 2). For example, we identified autoimmune-associated B cells (ABCs, B5) as a cell state shared between tissue and blood while plasma cell populations (P6-8) were tissue-specific. In the myeloid compartment, we identified plasmacytoid dendritic cells (DC20) as a shared population, while macrophage cell states were tissue-specific (M5-14). Using Covarying Neighborhood Analysis, we identified LN pathological features associated with cell state changes (Figure 3). Increasing chronicity tracked with the most dramatic changes in both tissue and immune states. The proportion of proximal tubule cells that were injured or degenerating (PT0, PT7) expanded with chronicity, reflecting ongoing, irreversible tissue damage. Increasing chronicity was associated with an expansion of tissue-specific CD56 bright NK cells (NK1), GPNMBhigh NUPR1high Macrophages (M5), and CLEC10Alow cDC2 (DC17). Most expanded immune populations were tissue-specific states. It was essential to identify activity-associated populations since they may be driving reversible inflammation in LN. Adjusting away chronicity, we identified specific activity-associated cell states in the myeloid compartment. Highly tissue-specific macrophage populations were expanded, including M5, GPNMBhigh LYVE1low (M11), C1Qlow SPP1high, SPP1high FABP5high (M7), and MERTKhigh FABP5high (M9). We speculate that M5 may be a profibrotic pathogenic population that may be targeted for therapeutic benefit. After adjusting for chronicity and activity, ISN classes were not independently associated with specific changes in cell states. Blood cell states minimally associated with activity or chronicity. We observed case-status associated with interferon signatures in both blood and tissue.

Conclusion: Our results define key cell states in the tissue and immune compartments and argue that profound changes in kidney tissue and immune cell states are associated with increasing chronicity. Specific myeloid compartment changes are associated with activity. These features are not associated with substantial changes in the blood. Our results argue that myeloid populations may be targeted, in addition to B cell therapies, to prevent progression of tissue inflammation and ongoing tissue damage in LN.

Supporting image 1Figure 1. a, Schematic overview of the data collection and analysis pipeline. Blood and kidney samples were collected from LN patients and healthy controls (HC). Histopathology and clinical scoring was performed on renal biopsies. CITE-sequencing was performed on blood samples, and scRNA-sequencing and snRNA-sequencing were performed on tissue samples. Both tissue modalities were integrated with Harmony (PMID: 31740819). Broad cell types were annotated separately in tissue and blood. Fine grain clustering for cell state annotation was performed on each broad cell type. For each tissue, covarying neighborhood analysis was performed within each cell type to define cell state associations with various clinical variables. b, UMAPs of all single cell or single nuclear annotations in tissue (left) and blood (right), colored by broad cell type annotation.

Supporting image 2Figure 2. a-b, Joint embedding of tissue (a) and blood (b) myeloid single-cell populations, colored by their original fine-grain annotations obtained in a separate embedding. c, Tissue specificity metric (TSM) scores stratified by cell state annotation. TSM was calculated as the proportion of a given cell’s 50 nearest neighbors that are from tissue, weighted to account for larger amount of total myeloid blood than tissue myeloid cells.

Supporting image 3Figure 3. a, UMAP of myeloid cell states in tissue, colored by fine grain cell state annotations. Annotation boxes are located at the centroid (mean) of each cluster. b, UMAP of per-cell correlation coefficient associations with activity index, as quantified in CNA. c, TSM for cells significantly expanded or depleted with activity index in CNA. d-e, CNA correlation coefficients for cells in each myeloid cluster, indicating cell state correlations with activity index (d) and chronicity index (e).


Disclosures: N. Sugiarto: None; M. Curtis: None; S. Gurajala: None; T. Eisenhaure: None; Q. Xiao: None; J. Mears: None; A. Arazi: None; P. Hoover: None; C. Berthier: None; S. Sakaue: None; A. Fava: Artiva, 2, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, Bain Capital, 2, Biogen, 1, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Exagen, 5, 9, Quotient Therapeutics, 2, UCB, 6, Zenas, 2; D. Hildeman: None; E. Woodle: Biogen, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Eledon, 5, Sanofi, 6; B. Rovin: Alexion, 2, Artiva, 2, 11, AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 2, 5, Biogen, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Cabelleta, 2, Century, 2, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc., 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Novartis, 2; J. Barnas: None; M. Dall'Era: AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 2, Biogen, 2, Genentech, Inc., 2, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), 2, Janssen, 2; C. Putterman: Cullinan, 1, Progentec, 1; D. Kamen: None; M. McMahon: Artiva, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 6, Aurinia, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1, 5, 6, Novartis, 5, Roche, 1; J. Grossman: artiva, 5, exact sciences, 11, illumina, 11, iqvia, 11, Merck/MSD, 11, Novartis, 5; K. Kalunian: AstraZeneca, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, Eli Lilly, 1, Genentech, 1, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1, Merck/MSD, 1, Novartis, 1, Pfizer, 1, Roche, 1; J. Hodgin: Genentech, 5, Gilead, 5; F. Payan Schober: None; M. Ishimori: None; M. Weisman: Spyre Therapeutics, 1, 2; W. Apruzzese: Pfizer, 3, 12, my contributions to this work occurred prior to my employment at Pfizer; J. Guthridge: None; M. Brenner: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, Johnson & Johnson, 5, Mestag Therapeutics, 2, 8, Moderna, 2, Ono Pharma, 5, Simcere, 2; J. Anolik: None; D. Wofsy: None; J. James: GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Progentec, 5; D. Rao: Abbvie, 6, Aditum, 2, AnaptysBio, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Biogen, 2, Dragonfly, 2, Epana, 1, HiFiBio Therapeutics, 2, Janssen, 5, Merck/MSD, 2, 5, Site Tx, 2; A. Davidson: None; M. Petri: Amgen, 2, AnaptysBio, 2, Annexon Bio, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Atara Biosciences, 2, Aurinia, 2, 5, Autolus, 2, Bain Capital, 2, Baobab Therapeutics, 2, Biocryst, 2, Biogen, 2, Boxer Capital, 2, Cabaletto Bio, 2, Caribou Biosciences, 2, CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, 2, CVS Health, 2, Dualitybio, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, EMD Serono, 2, Emergent, 2, Escient Pharmaceuticals, 2, Exagen, 5, Exo Therapeutics, 2, Gentibio, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, iCell Gene Therapeutics, 2, Innovaderm Research, 2, IQVIA, 2, Janssen, 5, Kezar Life Sciences, 2, Kira Pharmaceuticals, 2, Nexstone Immunology, 2, Nimbus Lakshmi, 2, Novartis, 2, Ono Pharma, 2, PPD Development, 2, Proviant, 2, Regeneron, 2, Seismic Therapeutic, 2, Senti Biosciences, 2, Sinomab Biosciences, 2, Steritas, 2, Takeda, 2, Tenet Medicines, 2, TG Therapeutics, 2, UCB, 2, Variant Bio, 2, Worldwide Clinical Trials, 2, Zydus, 2; J. Buyon: Artiva Biotherapeutics, 2, Biogen, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Celgene, 2, CLIMB Bio Operating, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Janssen, 2, Related Sciences, 2, UCB, 2; N. Hacohen: Calico Biosciences, 5, Cytoreason, 1, 11, Danger Bio, 1, 11, Moderna, 5, Repertoire Immune Medicines, 1, 11, Takeda, 5; B. Diamond: None; S. Raychaudhuri: Bonito, 1, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, Janssen, 1, Mestag, 1, 8, Nimbus, 2, Pfizer, 1, Sonoma, 1, 8, Visterra, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sugiarto N, Curtis M, Gurajala S, Eisenhaure T, Xiao Q, Mears J, Arazi A, Hoover P, Berthier C, Sakaue S, Fava A, Hildeman D, Woodle E, Rovin B, Barnas J, Dall'Era M, Putterman C, Kamen D, McMahon M, Grossman J, Kalunian K, Hodgin J, Payan Schober F, Ishimori M, Weisman M, Apruzzese W, Guthridge J, Brenner M, Anolik J, Wofsy D, James J, Rao D, Davidson A, Petri M, Buyon J, Hacohen N, Diamond B, Raychaudhuri S. Deconstructing Lupus Nephritis Kidney Tissue at Single-Cell Resolution [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/deconstructing-lupus-nephritis-kidney-tissue-at-single-cell-resolution/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/deconstructing-lupus-nephritis-kidney-tissue-at-single-cell-resolution/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology