ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2560

Quality and Accuracy of TikTok Videos on Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Modified DISCERN Analysis

Mahiar Rabie and Susan Harwell, University of Tennessee- Nashville, Nashville, TN

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), education, patient, health behaviors, spondyloarthritis, Statistical methods

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2547–2566) ARP Posters I

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the axial skeleton that can cause significant pain and disability. Its variable and often non-specific presentation can contribute to diagnostic delays, patient frustration, and the spread of misinformation, especially on social media platforms where individuals increasingly seek medical advice. TikTok, a leading social media application, has become a popular source of health-related content, yet its medical accuracy remains largely unregulated. This study aimed to assess the quality and reliability of TikTok content related to axSpA to better understand its educational value and potential for misinformation.

Methods: In April 2025, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the top 105 English-language TikTok videos using search terms including “Axial Spondyloarthritis,” “AxSpA,” “nrAxSpA,” and “Ankylosing Spondylitis.” Videos were included if they were publicly accessible, in English, posted within the past four years, and had received at least 100 “likes.” Eligible videos featured educational content, patient stories, or clinician-generated material. Each video was assessed using a validated modified DISCERN tool covering five criteria: clarity of aims, use of reliable sources, balance and objectivity, provision of additional references, and acknowledgment of uncertainties. Each criterion was scored 0 (not met) or 1 (met), for a total score of 0–5. Videos were also rated for medical accuracy (accurate, partially accurate/misleading, inaccurate) based on adherence to evidence-based information. Descriptive statistics and Kruskal-Wallis tests compared DISCERN scores across uploader categories.

Results: Of the 105 videos reviewed, 66 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were uploaded by patients (77.3%), followed by physicians (9.1%), chiropractors (9.1%), influencers (3.0%), and physical therapists (1.5%). Content most frequently addressed symptoms (62.1%), management strategies (62.1%), personal experiences (62.1%), and disease descriptions (39.4%), with most videos falling into multiple categories. Overall, 18.2% of videos were rated accurate, 56.1% partially accurate or misleading, and 25.8% inaccurate. The mean DISCERN scores (± SD) by uploader type were: physicians 3.50 ± 1.05, chiropractors 2.00 ± 1.55, physical therapists 3.00 (single data point), influencers 0.50 ± 0.71, and patients 1.63 ± 0.85. A Kruskal-Wallis test demonstrated a significant difference in DISCERN scores across uploader groups (H = 18.05, p = 0.0012). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons revealed that videos uploaded by physicians had significantly higher DISCERN scores compared to those uploaded by patients (p = 0.0003), while other comparisons were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: TikTok offers opportunities for patient education and community-building but contains a high prevalence of partially accurate or inaccurate information. The diagnostic complexity of axSpA may amplify misinformation risks. These findings highlight the urgent need for greater healthcare professional engagement on social media to enhance content reliability and support informed patient decision-making.

Supporting image 1Figure 1. Distribution of TikTok video uploaders. (n = 66)

Supporting image 2Table 1. Accuracy rating of included videos (n = 66) using a 3-tiered system: accurate, partially accurate/misleading, or inaccurate

Supporting image 3Table 2. DISCERN scores by uploader type


Disclosures: M. Rabie: None; S. Harwell: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rabie M, Harwell S. Quality and Accuracy of TikTok Videos on Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Modified DISCERN Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quality-and-accuracy-of-tiktok-videos-on-axial-spondyloarthritis-a-modified-discern-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quality-and-accuracy-of-tiktok-videos-on-axial-spondyloarthritis-a-modified-discern-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology