ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0940

Resident Macrophages Localize Near Fibroblasts and Drive Reprogramming in Lupus Nephritis Through Direct and Soluble Signaling

Chirag Raparia1, Paul Hoover2, Arnon Arazi3, Nir Hacohen4 and Anne Davidson1, 1Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, 2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Acton, MA, 4Broad Institute of MIT Harvard, Cambridge, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Fibroblasts, Other, Lupus nephritis, macrophages, Mouse Models, Lupus

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (0934–0954) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Animal Models Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe manifestation of SLE that can progress to renal fibrosis, and eventual renal failure. In LN, tubulointerstitial inflammation and macrophage infiltration are associated with a poor prognosis. Alongside macrophages, the renal fibrotic niche contains fibroblasts, and endothelial cells; however, the mechanisms of their crosstalk remain poorly understood. Using spatial transcriptomics in LN mouse models and single-cell analysis of in vitro cocultures, we reveal macrophage-driven fibroblast activation as a potential driving feature of renal fibrosis in LN.

Methods: Spatial transcriptomics in NZB/W F1 mice was performed using the 10x Genomics Xenium 389 gene platform, with markers for cell interior and boundaries and an additional gene panel customized to identify high-resolution myeloid populations. Primary NZB/W mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were cocultured with FACS-sorted renal resident macrophages (RMs) from nephritic and pre-nephritic NZB/W mice. Cocultures were analyzed by flow cytometry and scRNA-seq. Data were processed using Seurat and Harmony, and cell-cell communication was inferred using CellChat. MEF scratch wound assays with conditioned media (CM) from cocultures were performed, followed by bulk RNA-seq and GSEA for pathway analysis.

Results: Resident macrophages are located in the interstitium and acquire a damage associated Spp1+ gene expression profile during nephritis. In nephritic mice, resident macrophages, and not infiltrating macrophages, preferentially colocalized with FAP⁺ fibroblasts in renal infiltrates and peritubular spaces (Fig. 1A-B), correlating with areas of renal damage and fibrosis. In NZB/W MEF-RM cocultures, flow cytometry and scRNA-seq revealed Spp1+ and Spp1- macrophage populations and a heterogenous expansion of fibroblast populations, including Fap⁺ and Periostin⁺ MEFs, enriched for pro-fibrotic and inflammatory gene signatures (Fig. 2A). CellChat analysis identified signaling from Spp1⁺ macrophages to Fap⁺ MEFs via IL-1, TNF, and OSM, and GRN (Fig. 2B), facilitating a tissue remodeling phenotype. CM from nephritic cocultures induced a pro-inflammatory transcriptional program in MEFs, characterized by elevated Cxcl1, Cxcl5, Cxcl14, and Hif1a, confirmed by GSEA (Fig. 2C). Nephritic CM-treated MEFs experienced impaired wound closure in a scratch assay after 18 hours (Fig. 2D). In a separate study, we demonstrated that mouse and human LN resident kidney macrophages display similar transcriptional profiles and occupy comparable locations within the kidney. This similarity suggests that our findings in mouse models may also be applicable to human LN.

Conclusion: Spp1⁺ resident macrophages in nephritic kidneys localize with and drive fibroblast activation and reprogramming through direct interaction and soluble signaling. Direct macrophage signaling via IL-1, TNF, OSM, and GRN promotes both pro-fibrotic and inflammatory fibroblasts, while indirect signaling induces a pro-inflammatory signature and impairs fibroblast wound healing. Together, these results identify potential targets to modulate renal fibrosis and improve outcomes of LN.

Supporting image 1Figure 1: Spatial transcriptomic representation of a nephritic NZB/W kidney. A. An overview of a blood vessel immune infiltrate with resident macrophages labeled in green polygons and infiltrating damage-associated macrophages labeled in red. mRNA transcripts of ACTA2 and FAP are labeled with blue and orange dots, respectively. aSMA protein is depicted in pink. B. An enlarged image of the vessel infiltrate boxed in white in (A), showing resident macrophages colocalized with FAP+ ACTA2+ fibroblasts within the infiltrate.

Supporting image 2Figure 2: Direction and indirect fibroblast activation in vitro. A. UMAP of 6 MEF populations and 2 NZB/W RM populations from 48-hour direct contact coculture. N = 10, 3 nephritic mice RM-MEF cocultures, 3 pre-nephritic mice RM-MEF cocultures, 2 Time 0 MEF cultures, and 2 Time 48 cultures. B. Chord diagram of CellChat analysis of direct contact coculture of NZB/W nephritic and pre-nephritic RMs with MEFs. The thickness of each chord represents the magnitude of interaction. Blue chords originate from SPP1+ macrophages, brown from SPP1- macrophages, and red from FAP+ fibroblasts. C. GSEA plot of GOBP_Inflammatory Response pathway. Enrichment of the Inflammatory response is seen in the MEFS treated with the nephritic RM-MEF CM compared to the prenephritic (Young) RM-MEF CM. D. 18-hour scratch wound analysis of MEFs treated with conditioned media from the respective cocultures. Three biological replicates for each condition performed in duplicates. *p < 0.05 between MEFs treated with prenephritic and nephritic RM-MEF coculture CM.


Disclosures: C. Raparia: None; P. Hoover: None; A. Arazi: None; N. Hacohen: Calico Biosciences, 5, Cytoreason, 1, 11, Danger Bio, 1, 11, Moderna, 5, Repertoire Immune Medicines, 1, 11, Takeda, 5; A. Davidson: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Raparia C, Hoover P, Arazi A, Hacohen N, Davidson A. Resident Macrophages Localize Near Fibroblasts and Drive Reprogramming in Lupus Nephritis Through Direct and Soluble Signaling [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/resident-macrophages-localize-near-fibroblasts-and-drive-reprogramming-in-lupus-nephritis-through-direct-and-soluble-signaling/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/resident-macrophages-localize-near-fibroblasts-and-drive-reprogramming-in-lupus-nephritis-through-direct-and-soluble-signaling/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology