ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0705

Multimodal Imaging Evaluation of Patients with Raynaud’s Phenomenon meeting the Criteria for “Early” Systemic Sclerosis according to LeRoy versus Healthy Controls: a Prospective Cross-sectional study

Ramona Govender1, Elvis Hysa2, Rosanna Campitiello3, Steven Wallaert1, Matthias Vandycke1, Emanuele Gotelli3, Tessa Du Four1, Maurizio Cutolo4 and Vanessa Smith5, 1University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium, 2University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy, 3University of Genoa, Genoa, Liguria, Italy, 4University of Genova, Genova, Italy, 5Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, Scleroderma, Scleroderma, Systemic, Ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0671–0710) Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex autoimmune disorder. To date, no comparative multi-modal imaging data exist for precursor patients, those with Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) fulfilling the 2001 LeRoy and Medsger criteria1 for early SSc but without clinical skin thickening, compared to healthy controls.

Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included unselected RP patients (n=20) fulfilling LeRoy’s criteria (RP plus SSc-specific antibodies, RP plus scleroderma pattern, or RP plus both) of the Ghent University (hospital) Raynaud’s clinic. Age-, sex-, and BMI-matched healthy controls (HC) (n=20) were recruited for baseline comparison. Dermal thickness (DT) was measured using high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS, 18 MHz) at 17 anatomical sites, a reliable technique, as described by our previous findings2. Nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC ×200 magnification) was evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively using standardized Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium (SCTC)/ European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) Study Group on Microcirculation in Rheumatic Diseases consensus definitions. Peripheral blood perfusion (PBP) was assessed by laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA) in the volar aspect of both hands under standardized conditions, as described previously3. Exploratory statistical analysis included Student T-test, Wilcoxon, and Fischer exact tests for between-group comparisons as appropriate.

Results: RP patients showed no evidence of SSc-related organ involvement4, except for gastro-oesophageal reflux without oesophageal dilatation on high-resolution computerised tomography (HRCT) (Table. 1). HFUS revealed no clinically meaningful differences in DT between groups (all p > 0.05) (Figure. 1A). LASCA showed significantly reduced volar fingertip PBP in RP patients compared to HC (all p < 0.005) (Figure. 1B). Baseline NVC showed significantly lower capillary density in RP patients across all 8 fingers (all p < 0.05). RP patients exhibited higher frequencies of giant capillaries (5–21% vs 0%) and microhaemorrhages (32–35% vs 0–5%, p < 0.05), with no significant differences in abnormal shapes (Figure. 2). Early and active scleroderma patterns were observed exclusively in RP patients.

Conclusion: In RP patients meeting the LeRoy’s criteria for early SSc, functional and structural microvascular abnormalities are detectable before skin or organ involvement. In line with the clinical absence of skin thickening in both the RP as well as in the HC groups, HFUS was indiscriminatory. Future longitudinal studies will be needed to determine at what point HFUS detects discriminatory changes compared to HC. References:1. LeRoy et al. J Rheumatol. 20012. Cutolo et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 20253. Willems et al. Diagnostics. 20234. Vanhaecke et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022

Supporting image 1Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study population

Supporting image 2Figure 1. High frequency ultrasound (HFUS) and laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA) findings in Raynaud’s patients versus healthy controls at baseline

Supporting image 3Figure 2. Multi-panel image showing nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) findings in Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) patients (purple bars) vs healthy controls (green bars) at baseline. Significant p-values are graphically reported with the red outlines.


Disclosures: R. Govender: None; E. Hysa: None; R. Campitiello: None; S. Wallaert: None; M. Vandycke: None; E. Gotelli: None; T. Du Four: None; M. Cutolo: None; V. Smith: Argenx, 2, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 5, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Janssen, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Govender R, Hysa E, Campitiello R, Wallaert S, Vandycke M, Gotelli E, Du Four T, Cutolo M, Smith V. Multimodal Imaging Evaluation of Patients with Raynaud’s Phenomenon meeting the Criteria for “Early” Systemic Sclerosis according to LeRoy versus Healthy Controls: a Prospective Cross-sectional study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/multimodal-imaging-evaluation-of-patients-with-raynauds-phenomenon-meeting-the-criteria-for-early-systemic-sclerosis-according-to-leroy-versus-healthy-controls-a-prospective-cross-sectional-stu/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/multimodal-imaging-evaluation-of-patients-with-raynauds-phenomenon-meeting-the-criteria-for-early-systemic-sclerosis-according-to-leroy-versus-healthy-controls-a-prospective-cross-sectional-stu/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology