ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0630

Development, Validation and Performance of a Patient Knowledge Assessment Tool for Assessing the Immediate and Short-term Impact of an Information Course in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Ranjan Gupta, Rudra Prosad Goswami and Anju Mohan, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, Community programs, Education, education, patient, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0593–0640) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Long-term outcomes in rheumatic diseases can be improved by improving patients’ knowledge, beliefs and perception about their disease. However, there is a lack of tools/instruments in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) to 1. objectively assess patients’ knowledge in various domains & 2. To assess the impact of a patient education program.The aim of the study was to develop, validate and assess the performance of a self-prepared questionnaire for assessing patients’ knowledge about their disease and to use this tool to assess the impact of an information course in improving the above-mentioned elements among patients.

Methods: A self-prepared questionnaire (Hindi/English) containing 23 multiple choice or true-false type questions with single correct answer assessing patients’ knowledge about SLE in 3 domains (a. etiology, disease process, signs & symptoms b. drug therapy & monitoring c. role of investigations in disease diagnosis and monitoring) was prepared. All questions had an item-level content validity index (I-CVI) of at least 0.9. The scale-level content validity index based on the universal agreement method (S-CVI/UA) was 0.8 for the whole questionnaire as assessed by 6 experts. All questions had an option of ‘I don’t know’ which would prevent patients from guessing the answer from the available options. Each question was given a score of 1 if answered correctly. The questionnaire was applied 3 times: at baseline, immediately after an information course to see the immediate impact and after 6 months to see the retention of the information. Information on demographic features and socio-economic status was also collected. Frequency data were compared using McNemar test for paired nominal data & kappa statistics for ordinal data. Student’s paired t-test was used for comparison of mean scores to see the impact. A p-value< 0.5 was considered significant.

Results: At baseline, the questionnaire was applied to 56 patients with SLE (F:M=54:2; median age 29(16-53) years) and the median(range) score was 10(2-19) (Table–1). Among them, 39 patients attended the information course. The option ‘I don’t know’ was exercised 509 times (39.51%) before the information course which reduced to 169 (18.84%) times after the course and 108 (13.04%) times at 6 months. After the information course, median score increased from 10(2-19) to 17(0-23) (p< 0.001) which was irrespective of the socio-economic classes and education status of the patients (Figure-1). A total of 13 questions recorded a higher number of correct responses as compared to baseline and this increase was significant for all 13 questions (Table–1). Upon re-administering the questionnaire after 6 months, 36 patients out of 39 responded. The median score 16(0-23) of the questionnaire (n=36) remained significantly higher (p< 0.001) as compared to baseline score. Eight out of 23 questions achieved statistical significance (Table–2).

Conclusion: Indian patients with SLE have a poor knowledge base which can be improved by implementing short information courses. The information course was effective across the socio-economic classes and educational status and the information was retained at 6th month without any reinforcement course.

Supporting image 1Table – 1 Question-wise assessment of responses before and after the information course and the statistical significance of the change

Supporting image 2Table – 2 Question-wise assessment of responses before the information course and after 6 months with the statistical significance of the change


Disclosures: R. Gupta: None; R. Goswami: None; A. Mohan: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gupta R, Goswami R, Mohan A. Development, Validation and Performance of a Patient Knowledge Assessment Tool for Assessing the Immediate and Short-term Impact of an Information Course in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/development-validation-and-performance-of-a-patient-knowledge-assessment-tool-for-assessing-the-immediate-and-short-term-impact-of-an-information-course-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/development-validation-and-performance-of-a-patient-knowledge-assessment-tool-for-assessing-the-immediate-and-short-term-impact-of-an-information-course-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology