ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0851

Urinary Tenascin C Predicts Kidney Function Loss in Lupus Nephritis

CHEN-YU LEE1, Sepehr Taghavi2, Shangzhu Zhang3, Roopa Madhu4, Jasmine Shwetar5, Tyler O'Malley6, Daniel Goldman7, Peter Izmirly8, H Michael Belmont9, Richard Furie10, Noa Schwartz11, Chaim Putterman12, Jennifer Barnas13, Jennifer Anolik14, Sarah French15, Maria Dall'Era16, Judith James17, Joel Guthridge17, Jacob Vasquez18, Mike Nerenberg19, Andrew Concoff20, Christine Schleif21, Kevin Wei22, Thomas Eisenhaure23, Nir Hacohen23, Rachael Bogle24, Johann Gudjonsson25, Lam Tsoi25, Brad Rovin26, Jill Buyon27, Michelle Petri7 and Andrea Fava1, 1Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 2Exagen Inc, Escondido, CA, 3Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China (People's Republic), 4Brigham and Women's Hospital, Brookline, MA, 5New York School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 6Exagen, Vista, CA, 7Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Timonium, MD, 8New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 9NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10Division of Rheumatology, Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, 11Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, 12Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Safed, Israel, 13University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 14University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 15UCSF, Mill Valley, CA, 16Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 17Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 18Exagen, Inc., Vista, CA, 19Exagen, DEL MAR, CA, 20Specialty Networks/United Rheumatology, a Cardinal Health Company, N/A, 21Exagen, Carlsbad, CA, 22Brigham and Women's Hospital at Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 23Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, 24University of Michigan, Holland, OH, 25University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 26The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 27NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Biomarkers, Fibroblasts, Other, Lupus nephritis, proteomics, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: Plenary II (0849–0854)

Session Type: Plenary Session

Session Time: 8:30AM-8:45AM

Background/Purpose: Kidney survival is the ultimate treatment goal in lupus nephritis (LN), but long-term predictors remain understudied due to the need for extensive follow up. Proteinuria at one year is used to establish treatment response, but it is inadequate: repeat biopsy studies showed persistent intrarenal activity in ~50% of proteinuric responders with up to 30% progressing to renal insufficiency. Our objective was to identify urinary biomarkers that predict kidney function loss.

Methods: We followed 170 LN patients from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership (AMP) cohort up to 7.8 years (median 4.9). Treatment was discretionary. Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) loss was defined as a sustained ≥40% decline in eGFR from baseline or development of end-stage kidney disease. We quantified 1200 biomarkers (RayBiotech) in urine samples collected at time of kidney biopsy and month 3, 6, and 12 in LN. Time-to-event models were used to evaluate associations between urinary protein levels and risk of future eGFR loss. Kidney single-cell RNA-seq and spatial transcriptomics (Xenium) were used to identify the renal cellular source of biomarkers. A Random Survival Forest model was trained to predict eGFR loss at any time after baseline and validated on a 20% hold-out test set.

Results: During follow-up, 53/170 (31%) patients developed eGFR loss. At month 3, Tenascin C emerged as the strongest predictor of eGFR loss (HR 4.6) and remained elevated through month 12 (Figure 1). Several inflammatory and fibrosis-associated markers (i.e., CD163, CD206, FABP4, IL6, IGFBP-6) were persistently associated with increased risk. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics localized Tenascin C expression to interstitial myofibroblasts in LN kidneys, suggesting a pathologic role in progressive fibrosis (Figure 2). To maximize clinical applicability, we developed a urinary protein-based classifier to predict future eGFR loss at any time point after baseline. The model (11-proteins, including tenascin C) achieved excellent predictive performance (AUC = 0.91 at 48 months) stratifying patients into high- and low-risk groups (Figure 3A). For example, at month 12, the risk score was significantly associated with eGFR preservation (p < 0.001, Figure 3B), and revealed heterogeneity within proteinuric response groups: some responders (UPCR < 0.5) had high risk scores, while some non-responders had low scores (Figure 3C). The classifier accurately predicted eGFR loss in both groups underscoring the limitations of proteinuria and the added utility of biomarker-based risk prediction (Figure 3D-E).

Conclusion: Urinary Tenascin C, a marker of myofibroblast activation, emerged as a robust predictor of kidney function loss in LN. Elevated CD163 and CD206 levels in high-risk patients point to ongoing M2 macrophage–driven profibrotic signaling and incomplete resolution of intrarenal inflammation, even among proteinuric responders. A proteomics-based risk score outperformed proteinuria, accurately stratifying high-risk individuals regardless of response. These findings offer mechanistic insight and support early biomarker-guided strategies to personalize treatment, refine clinical trials, and prevent irreversible kidney damage.

Supporting image 1Figure 1. Proteomics signatures of increased risk of eGFR loss over time. Cox regression results at month 0, 3, 6, 12 (A-D). Only proteins with a significant hazard ratio greater than 2 are labeled on the four volcano plots. eGFR and UPCR are labeled in blue. (E) Heatmap summarizing urinary proteins significantly associated with eGFR loss from month 3 onward. Color intensity indicates the hazard ratio (HR) for eGFR loss, with white representing HR = 1 and deeper red shades indicating higher HR values. *: adjusted p < 0.05; **: adjusted p < 0.01; ***: adjusted p < 0.001. eGFR: estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; UPCR: urine protein-to-creatinine ratio.

Supporting image 2Figure 2. Tenascin C is broadly expressed in LN by myofibroblasts. (A) UMAP projection of ~ 500k cells from 16 kidney biopsies profiled using Xenium and scFFPE RNA sequencing from the AMPAIM cohort. Each cluster is labeled by its inferred cell type, and cells are colored by log-normalized expression of Tenascin C (TNC). The interstitial stromal cluster is highlighted in the red circle. (B) Violin plots of TNC expression across interstitial subpopulations): vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC, n=3,854), VSMC/pericytes (VSMC/P, n=5,458), VSMC/endothelial cells (VSMC/EC, n=2,933), fibroblasts (Fib, n=3,584), and myofibroblasts (Myofib, n=1,220). Myofibroblasts show the highest TNC levels, indicating this cell type as the primary source. Data generated from the AMP RA/SLE cohort (n=200) using 10X Genomics scRNA-seq technology on disaggregated kidney biopsies. (C) Spatial transcriptomic map (10× Xenium) of a representative LN kidney section: yellow circles mark TNC transcript density, demonstrating broad expression within interstitial regions (scale bar = 2000 µm).

Supporting image 3Figure 3. Urinary proteomics-based risk score predicts renal function loss and stratifies patients by treatment response. (A) Time-dependent ROC curve at 48 months demonstrates predictive performance of the risk score, with an optimal Youden cutoff of 9.65 separating high- and low-risk groups for eGFR decline. An 80:20 data split was used for model development, with 80% of patients in the training set and 20% held out for independent testing. Cross-validation within the training set optimized model hyperparameters. All follow-up visits were used to train the model to predict future eGFR loss. To prevent data leakage and overfitting, patients were split at the subject level, ensuring that all visits from a given patient remained in either the training or test set. (B) Kaplan-Meier kidney survival analysis for all patients, stratified by risk score at month 12. Patients with scores ≥9.65 were classified as high risk; those < 9.65 as low risk. (C) Distribution of risk scores by treatment response at month 12. (D-E) Kidney survival stratified by risk score among proteinuric responders (D, UPCR < 0.5) and non-responders (E, UPCR ≥ 0.5).


Disclosures: C. LEE: None; S. Taghavi: Exagen, 3; S. Zhang: None; R. Madhu: None; J. Shwetar: None; T. O'Malley: Exagen, 12,, 3, 11; D. Goldman: None; P. Izmirly: Hansoh Bio, 2; H. Belmont: None; R. Furie: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 12, Investigator, Genentech, Inc., 2, 12, Investigator, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), 2, 5, Kyverna Therapeutics, 12, Investigator, Merck/MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, 12, Investigator, Regeneron, 2; N. Schwartz: None; C. Putterman: Cullinan, 1, Progentec, 1; J. Barnas: None; J. Anolik: None; S. French: None; M. Dall'Era: AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 2, Biogen, 2, Genentech, Inc., 2, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), 2, Janssen, 2; J. James: GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Progentec, 5; J. Guthridge: None; J. Vasquez: None; M. Nerenberg: Exagen, 3, 11; A. Concoff: Exagen Inc., 3; C. Schleif: Exagen, 3; K. Wei: 10X Genomics, 5, anaptysbio, 2, Gilead, 5, Merck/MSD, 5, Mestag, 2, Pfizer, 2; T. Eisenhaure: None; N. Hacohen: None; R. Bogle: None; J. Gudjonsson: None; L. Tsoi: Galderma, 5, Janssen, 5; B. Rovin: Alexion, 2, Artiva, 2, 11, AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 2, 5, Biogen, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Cabelleta, 2, Century, 2, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc., 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Novartis, 2; J. Buyon: Artiva Biotherapeutics, 2, Biogen, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Celgene, 2, CLIMB Bio Operating, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Janssen, 2, Related Sciences, 2, UCB, 2; M. Petri: Amgen, 2, AnaptysBio, 2, Annexon Bio, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Atara Biosciences, 2, Aurinia, 2, 5, Autolus, 2, Bain Capital, 2, Baobab Therapeutics, 2, Biocryst, 2, Biogen, 2, Boxer Capital, 2, Cabaletto Bio, 2, Caribou Biosciences, 2, CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, 2, CVS Health, 2, Dualitybio, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, EMD Serono, 2, Emergent, 2, Escient Pharmaceuticals, 2, Exagen, 5, Exo Therapeutics, 2, Gentibio, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, iCell Gene Therapeutics, 2, Innovaderm Research, 2, IQVIA, 2, Janssen, 5, Kezar Life Sciences, 2, Kira Pharmaceuticals, 2, Nexstone Immunology, 2, Nimbus Lakshmi, 2, Novartis, 2, Ono Pharma, 2, PPD Development, 2, Proviant, 2, Regeneron, 2, Seismic Therapeutic, 2, Senti Biosciences, 2, Sinomab Biosciences, 2, Steritas, 2, Takeda, 2, Tenet Medicines, 2, TG Therapeutics, 2, UCB, 2, Variant Bio, 2, Worldwide Clinical Trials, 2, Zydus, 2; A. Fava: Artiva, 2, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, Bain Capital, 2, Biogen, 1, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Exagen, 5, 9, Quotient Therapeutics, 2, UCB, 6, Zenas, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

LEE C, Taghavi S, Zhang S, Madhu R, Shwetar J, O'Malley T, Goldman D, Izmirly P, Belmont H, Furie R, Schwartz N, Putterman C, Barnas J, Anolik J, French S, Dall'Era M, James J, Guthridge J, Vasquez J, Nerenberg M, Concoff A, Schleif C, Wei K, Eisenhaure T, Hacohen N, Bogle R, Gudjonsson J, Tsoi L, Rovin B, Buyon J, Petri M, Fava A. Urinary Tenascin C Predicts Kidney Function Loss in Lupus Nephritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/urinary-tenascin-c-predicts-kidney-function-loss-in-lupus-nephritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/urinary-tenascin-c-predicts-kidney-function-loss-in-lupus-nephritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology