ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0532

Generative artificial intelligence provides synthetic data to discriminate patients with seronegative rheumatoid arthritis versus psoriatic arthritis sine psoriasis

Antonio Tonutti1, Saverio D'Amico2, Pierandrea Morandini2, Cosimo Faeti2, Elisa Barone1, Nicoletta Luciano1, Victor Savevski2 and Carlo Selmi3, 1Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy, 2IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy, 3Humanitas University, Milan, Italy

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: informatics, Psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, Statistical methods

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0522–0553) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Distinguishing seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from psoriatic arthritis (PsA) sine psoriasis remains challenging, often relying on pathognomonic features (axial involvement, enthesitis) present in only few cases and causing diagnostic changes over time.Generative artificial intelligence (AI) creates synthetic patient profiles to enhance the detection of subtle differences that may elude clinical observation. We applied generative AI for the first time in Rheumatology to evaluate statistical fidelity, privacy preservation, and clinical utility of synthetic data, and to test its potential to differentiate seronegative RA vs PsA sine psoriasis.

Methods: Leveraging data of 105 PsA sine psoriasis and 95 seronegative RA patients, a proprietary synthetic data generation platform was used to implement an optimized Conditional Tabular Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) to produce 200 synthetic patients balanced across diagnostic groups. These were evaluated using Synthetic vAlidation FramEwork (SAFE) (D’Amico S, 2023). MOSAIC framework (D’Amico S, 2024) was employed for classification (PsA vs. RA), using demographic and baseline clinical variables. A Random Forest model was developed and tested on a real validation dataset using 3-fold cross-validation, then was re-evaluated after incorporating synthetic data into the training set to assess any performance enhancement using the same validation set. Model outputs were interpreted with Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

Results: Generation of 200 synthetic patients had 73% privacy preservation score (nearest neighbor distance ratio; optimal 65-85) and 92% statistical fidelity, indicating that the synthetic cohort mirrored the real one without duplication with similar distributions in principal component analysis (Fig 1).In the real dataset, Random Forest achieved accuracy 85.5% ± 2.3% in distinguishing PsA sine psoriasis from seronegative RA. Random Forest identified family history of psoriasis, monoarthritis, axial disease, enthesitis, fibromyalgia, and high BMI as strong PsA predictors and captured the discrepancy between inflammatory and noninflammatory mechanisms as proper of PsA (higher baseline PhGA, low swollen joint count and CRP). Symmetric arthritis favored classification as RA (Fig 2A).Incorporating synthetic patients, Random Forest accuracy increased to 86.2% ± 2.5%, retained key predictors including typical PsA features (enthesitis, axial and asymmetric involvement), family history of psoriasis, and discrepancy between pain and inflammatory measures (low CRP and swollen joint count, fibromyalgia). Notably, peripheral polyarthritis vs oligoarthritis favored RA and PsA, respectively (Fig 2B).

Conclusion: The first-ever application of generative AI in Rheumatology provided a synthetic data cohort of seronegative RA and PsA sine psoriasis, consistent with real data and privacy-safe. Synthetic data improved classification accuracy. Key variables for intercepting PsA sine psoriasis included family history of PsO, axial/entheseal involvement and mismatch between pain measures and inflammatory markers.

Supporting image 1Principal component analysis of demographic and clinical variables of the synthetic and real cohort. While the distribution of the two principal components is similar between real and synthetic patients (mirroring clinical consistency of generated data), no overlap is observed (mirroring absence of duplication and privacy safety).

Supporting image 2SHAP summary plot showing the top 10 most influential features for the Random Forest model trained on real (Panel A) and real+synthetic (Panel B) data to distinguish PsA sine PsO (right in the plot) from seronegative RA (left in the plot). Each dot represents a patient; colors indicate feature value (red = high/high frequency, blue = low/low frequency).


Disclosures: A. Tonutti: None; S. D'Amico: None; P. Morandini: None; C. Faeti: None; E. Barone: None; N. Luciano: None; V. Savevski: None; C. Selmi: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Alfa-Wassermann, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, EUSA, 2, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 5, SOBI, 2, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tonutti A, D'Amico S, Morandini P, Faeti C, Barone E, Luciano N, Savevski V, Selmi C. Generative artificial intelligence provides synthetic data to discriminate patients with seronegative rheumatoid arthritis versus psoriatic arthritis sine psoriasis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/generative-artificial-intelligence-provides-synthetic-data-to-discriminate-patients-with-seronegative-rheumatoid-arthritis-versus-psoriatic-arthritis-sine-psoriasis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/generative-artificial-intelligence-provides-synthetic-data-to-discriminate-patients-with-seronegative-rheumatoid-arthritis-versus-psoriatic-arthritis-sine-psoriasis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology