ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0193

Evaluation of electronic health record and efficiency tool utilization by pediatric subspecialists

Samantha Coss1, Alison Brittain2, Jennifer Lee3, Julie Young1, Ivana Stojkic1, John Mahan4 and Alysha Taxter5, 1Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, 2Nationwide Children's Hospital, Canal Winchester, OH, 3Department of Gastroenterology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, 4Department of Nephrology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, 5Nationwide Children's, Columbus, OH

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Health Care, Health Services Research, informatics, Pediatric rheumatology, Systems-based Studies

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0175–0198) Health Services Research Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Excessive interaction with the electronic health record (EHR) is frequently cited as a common source of physician burnout. The administrative burden and extended documentation time required by EHR systems can significantly contribute to physician fatigue and discontent. This study evaluated EHR utilization across pediatric subspecialties.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study evaluating EHR utilization data from 8 pediatric subspecialties at a quaternary medical center. Three months of outpatient EHR provider action logs from spring 2024 were evaluated. We assessed factors associated with EHR utilization including the percentage of time reviewing the chart, writing notes, addressing in-basket tasks, managing orders as well as measures of efficient EHR usage including the percentage of notes manually typed, percentage of same day chart closure, and the use of efficiency tools were recorded. Time actively using the EHR was normalized by number of clinic appointments. Non-business work hours were measured by average minutes per month utilizing the EHR outside of 7AM to 530PM. Providers were stratified by greater than or less than 5 half-day sessions of clinic per week to assess differences in EHR utilization based on clinical load. Summary statistics are reported. Comparisons were made between groups using Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Results: 127 provider logs were assessed across 8 specialties, with a median of 17 [10, 33] providers per specialty. Nine pediatric rheumatologists spent a median of 53 [48, 56] minutes within the EHR per patient appointment, whereas other subspecialists spent a median of 34 [23, 44] minutes (p< 0.01) (Table 1). The percentage of time completing non-documentation tasks within the EHR and rates of same day chart closure were similar between rheumatology and other subspecialists. The use of diagnosis and level of service speed buttons, quick actions, and chart review filters did not differ between rheumatologists and other subspecialists. All rheumatologists but only 68% of other subspecialists utilized chart search (p=0.04). There was no difference in EHR utilization metrics when stratifying by the number of clinic sessions within subspecialty departments (Table 2).

Conclusion: Pediatric rheumatologists spend significantly more time per appointment within the EHR than other subspecialty providers, and the majority of this extra time is spent on documentation. Leveraging new tools such as ambient listening and other artificial intelligence tools may lessen documentation burden and improve EHR utilization, potentially decreasing burnout rates and improving workforce retention.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: S. Coss: None; A. Brittain: None; J. Lee: None; J. Young: None; I. Stojkic: None; J. Mahan: None; A. Taxter: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Coss S, Brittain A, Lee J, Young J, Stojkic I, Mahan J, Taxter A. Evaluation of electronic health record and efficiency tool utilization by pediatric subspecialists [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-electronic-health-record-and-efficiency-tool-utilization-by-pediatric-subspecialists/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-electronic-health-record-and-efficiency-tool-utilization-by-pediatric-subspecialists/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology