ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0191

Advanced therapy use in RA patients with moderate disease activity in a large NHS Foundation Trust in South London, UK

Aoibhinn Kelly1, Maddalena Rupnik2, Nasra Ahmed1, Mrinalini Dey3 and Elena Nikiphorou4, 1King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, 2Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom, 3Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 4King's College London, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Access to care, Disease Activity, Quality Indicators, quality of care, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0175–0198) Health Services Research Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Moderate disease in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is defined as a 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) of 3.2-5.1(MDAS). As per the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE, TA 715, TA 744 & TA 676), patients with moderate RA failing ≥2 conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) should be assessed for eligibility for a TNF-inhibitor, upadacitinib or filgotinib [1].We aimed to assess compliance with NICE guidance on moderate RA management in a diverse area of London.

Methods: All patients with confirmed RA (EULAR/ACR 2010 criteria [2]) seen in the last 18 months were extracted from the electronic records (Epic) of King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Patients with recorded MDAS and previously receiving ≥2 csDMARDs were included. Exclusion criteria were: temporarily stopping advanced therapy (eg due to malignancy or infection); commencing a biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD (b/tsDMARD) not specified in TA 715, 744 or 676; no recorded DAS28 or components.Patients were analysed in two groups:i) those on a biologic via the moderate RA pathway;ii) those not on a biologic. All patients in group I were automatically eligible for inclusion. For group II, a random sample of 250 patients were reviewed in depth for encounters in which MDAS was recorded. If MDAS was present, reasons for not starting advanced therapy were extracted from Epic, if available. Other data extracted included demographics, DAS28, comorbidities and treatment history.Results were summarised using descriptive statistics. Reasons for delaying therapy were summarised using narrative synthesis.

Results: In total, 87 patients commenced advanced therapy via the moderate RA pathway (mean age [SD]: 53 [14.7]; 55% female), most commonly adalimumab (n=70) (Table 1).Of the 250 patients not on a b/tsDMARD, 20 had no recorded DAS (5% (n=13) did not attend a rheumatology appointment; 3% (n=7) had telephone encounters). 2% (n=6) had MDAS documented on ≥1 occasions (3.23-4.23), 50% female and mean age 63 (SD 8.0).In all six MDAS cases, no offer of advanced therapy was recorded. One patient with MDAS had “apprehension about starting new medications” due to previous DMARD side-effects. Three patients with MDAS were subsequently assessed via telephone, precluding DAS assessment (Figure 1).

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate good compliance with NICE on escalation to advanced therapies in patients with MDAS. Increased telehealth usage limits assessment of joints and suitability for treatment escalation, especially in district hospitals. Self-assessment tools, to complete prior to telephone appointments, may mitigate this. Clinicians may be reluctant to discuss advanced therapies if patients demonstrate medication hesitancy. Shared decision-making, appropriate triage for telehealth assessment and greater use of self-assessment tools are vital in facilitating discussions and commencement of advanced therapy in moderate RA.References1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2021. TA715, TA744 & TA676. Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/. 2. Aletaha, D et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An ACR/EULAR collaborative initiative. Arthritis & Rheumatism.

Supporting image 1Table 1: Summary of characteristics of included patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including those commenced on advanced therapy via the moderate RA pathway during the 18-month study period.

Supporting image 2Figure 1: Summary of potential reasons for commencing or delaying advanced therapy in the setting of moderate disease activity (MDAS) in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Possible reasons identified from this study include medication hesitancy (due to previous side-effects), telehealth assessments with no disease activity scores completed, and delays in accessing clinic appointments especially in rural or district hospitals. Mitigating factors may include the use of self-assessment tools in conjunction with telehealth and increased shared decision-making.


Disclosures: A. Kelly: None; M. Rupnik: None; N. Ahmed: None; M. Dey: None; E. Nikiphorou: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, 2, 6, Alfasigma, 1, 6, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 5, 6, Fresenius, 1, 6, Galapagos, 1, 6, Gilead, 1, 6, Novartis, 1, 2, 6, Pfizer, 1, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 1, 2, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kelly A, Rupnik M, Ahmed N, Dey M, Nikiphorou E. Advanced therapy use in RA patients with moderate disease activity in a large NHS Foundation Trust in South London, UK [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/advanced-therapy-use-in-ra-patients-with-moderate-disease-activity-in-a-large-nhs-foundation-trust-in-south-london-uk/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/advanced-therapy-use-in-ra-patients-with-moderate-disease-activity-in-a-large-nhs-foundation-trust-in-south-london-uk/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology