ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2033

Sex Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis After Starting a New Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Medication

John Davis1, Sara Achenbach2, Courtney Arment1, Delamo Bekele1, Vanessa Kronzer1, Thomas Mason1, Elena Myasoedova1, Lynne Peterson1, Kerry Wright1 and Cynthia Crowson1, 1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Rochester, MN

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), gender, Patient reported outcomes, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (2019–2038) Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures are valued in the assessment of health outcomes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, little is known about sex differences in change in key PROMIS domains following initiation of DMARD therapy. We aimed to examine sex differences in PROs among patients with RA after starting a new DMARD.

Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with RA seen at a single institution between 1/2020 and 10/2021 were included. RA patients were identified by presence of 2 diagnostic codes (ICD-10: M05.x/M06.x, excluding M06.1) and prescription of a DMARD. PROMIS computer adaptive tests for Physical Function, Pain Interference, Fatigue, Depression, and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities were routinely collected at each clinical visit. Patients with available PROMIS measures at the start of a new conventional synthetic (cs), biologic (b), or targeted synthetic (ts) DMARD and at least one subsequent visit were included in the analysis. Minimum clinically important differences (MCID) and meaningful differences were defined for each PROMIS measure (ref: Bartlett et al, AC&R 2022). Generalized binomial models with logit link were used to examine sex differences in improvement or worsening of PROMIS measures over time, adjusting for age, DMARD type and duration.

Results: A total of 179 patients with RA (76% female; 93% white; mean age 56.2 years) who started 202 new DMARDs (85 csDMARDs, 88 bDMARDs and 29 tsDMARDs) were studied. Median follow-up was 5.8 (interquartile range: 3.7-9.4) months per DMARD. Mean (±SD) PROMIS measures at DMARD initiation were 38.7 (±7.0) for physical function, 44.7 (±7.8) for social participation, 62.7 (±5.8) for Pain interference, 58.6 (±9.2) for fatigue and 5.20 (±8.7) for depression. Women were 3 times more likely to have worsening of their depression score by at least 2 points after starting a new DMARD (36% of women worsened vs 18% of men; odds ratio: 3.07; 95% CI: 1.29-7.30; Table). This association persisted after adjusting for change in physical function (OR: 2.86; 95% CI: 1.16-7.01). This association also persisted (but did not reach statistical significance) in the subset of patients who experienced a meaningful improvement in physical function (OR: 4.16; 95% CI: 0.71-24.44). No statistically significant sex differences were noted in pain interference (p=0.69) or ability to participate (p=0.23). Women were somewhat more likely to experience worsening physical function (OR: 2.24; 95% CI: 0.92-5.48; p=0.08) and were somewhat less likely to experience worsening fatigue (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.26-1.21; p=0.14) compared to men, but these associations did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion: We observed that women with RA initiating a new DMARD were more likely to experience worsening depression as compared to men, even when they experienced treatment-associated improvement in physical function. The findings point to important sex differences in PRO responses to DMARD therapy and highlight the value of PROMIS measures in understanding sex differences in RA health outcomes.

Supporting image 1


Disclosures: J. Davis: Girihlet, 9, Pfizer, 5, Remission Medical, 9; S. Achenbach: None; C. Arment: None; D. Bekele: None; V. Kronzer: None; T. Mason: None; E. Myasoedova: None; L. Peterson: None; K. Wright: None; C. Crowson: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Davis J, Achenbach S, Arment C, Bekele D, Kronzer V, Mason T, Myasoedova E, Peterson L, Wright K, Crowson C. Sex Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis After Starting a New Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Medication [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sex-differences-in-patient-reported-outcomes-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-after-starting-a-new-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-medication/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sex-differences-in-patient-reported-outcomes-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-after-starting-a-new-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-medication/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology