ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1073

In Favor of the Subspecialty Clinic Model for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Jasmine Thai1, Roshan Patel1, Yeohan Song1 and Sheryl Mascarenhas2, 1Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 2Ohio State University Hospital, Columbus, OH

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Health Services Research, Patient reported outcomes, quality of care, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Health Services Research Poster II: Care Models and Innovation (1061–1082)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: The Subspecialty Clinic Model (SCM) which seeks to allow for collaborative care and services by stratifying patients with a particular disease or need to a specialized clinic has been growing in popularity in rheumatology. This model has been shown to not only improve patient satisfaction but also patient outcomes. While the SCM is popular in other rheumatologic diseases such as lupus, it is less popular for rheumatoid arthritis. In this study, we sought to collect patients’ perspectives on a SCM for RA. To our knowledge, this is the first study to take into account patient perspectives in designing a RA subspecialty clinic.

Methods: 54 adult patients with a diagnosis of RA based on ICD-10 diagnostic codes were surveyed at an outpatient rheumatology clinic. Participants were asked to complete a survey rating their interest (0-10, with 10 being the most desired) in having a service (pharmacist, nurse, physical therapist, hand therapist, orthopedics, podiatrist, psychiatrist, cardiologist, support group, xray, ultrasound), the time (0, 5, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60 minutes) they were willing to have with said services, whether they would agree to be billed for the services, how often they would attend a clinic under the SCM, and if they would transfer care to a SCM. Statistical measures of location were used to analyze the data.

Results: Among those surveyed, 88% of respondents were interested in having at least one of the services that were described. Almost all participants (94%) expressed interest in getting an annual report. Having a psychiatrist help improve pain perception was the least popular service, but over half the respondents still expressed interest (62%). Among respondents who were interested in a service, the service that evoked the strongest interest was hand physical therapy (average of 8.19). The service that evoked the weakest response was a support group (average of 4.74). Participants were willing to spend the most time with a physical therapist (average 28 minutes) and the least time with a pharmacist and nurse (average 10 minutes). More than 75% of respondents were willing to be billed for xrays, ultrasound, physical therapy, hand therapy, and orthopedics. Less than 60% of respondents were willing to be billed for the remaining services. 74% of participants reported that they would attend a clinic under the SCM at least yearly and 50% were willing to transfer their care in order to access these services.

Conclusion: Patient perspective and satisfaction has recently become a focus in medicine as it often positively correlates to patient outcomes. The response from our participants were strongly in favor of the SCM for rheumatoid arthritis. This indicates that movement to the SCM may be advisable.


Disclosures: J. Thai, None; R. Patel, None; Y. Song, None; S. Mascarenhas, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Thai J, Patel R, Song Y, Mascarenhas S. In Favor of the Subspecialty Clinic Model for Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/in-favor-of-the-subspecialty-clinic-model-for-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/in-favor-of-the-subspecialty-clinic-model-for-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology