ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0833

Effectiveness of Upadacitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in German Real-World Practice: Interim Results from a Post-Marketing Observational Study

Torsten Witte1, Uta Kiltz2, Florian Haas3, Elke Riechers4, Ulrich Prothmann5, Daniela Adolf6, Carsten Holland7, Rouven Hecht8, Alexander Rössler7, Kirsten Famulla8, Konrad Götz8 and Klaus Krüger9, 1Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, 2Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany, 3Internistisch-Rheumatologische Facharztpraxis, Tübingen, Germany, 4Department for Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical University, Hannover, 5Knappschaftsklinikum Saar, Püttlingen, Germany, 6StatConsult GmbH, Biometry and Data Management, Magdeburg, Germany, 7AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden, 8AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden, Germany, 9Rheumatological Practice Center, Munich, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: C-reactive protein (CRP), Cohort Study, longitudinal studies, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: Comparative Effectiveness, Biosimilars, Withdrawal, & the Real World (0813–0845)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Upadacitinib (UPA) is a Janus kinase inhibitor that has been shown to be effective and well tolerated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the Phase 3 SELECT clinical trials.1–6 However, data on the use of UPA in real-world clinical practice are limited. The UPwArds study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of UPA as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with RA in German clinical practice.

Methods: UPwArds is an ongoing, prospective, multicenter, non-interventional, post-marketing study in adult patients with moderate-to-severe RA who are treated with UPA 15 mg once daily according to the product label, with the decision to initiate UPA made prior to study participation. Per protocol, the study enrolled around 50% of patients receiving UPA monotherapy and 50% of patients receiving UPA + MTX. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving remission defined as Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤2.8 at 6 months. Key secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving CDAI ≤2.8 and ≤10, Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) ≤3.3 and ≤11, and 28-joint Disease Activity Score using CRP (DAS28[CRP]) < 2.6 and ≤3.2 at each visit. Changes from baseline in disease activity and patient-reported outcomes were also assessed. This descriptive interim analysis reports data for the patients who had completed Visit 3 (Month 6) by the cut-off date of March 22, 2021. Data are presented as observed and summarized descriptively, with no statistical analyses conducted.

Results: Of the 483 patients at baseline (76.4% female; mean disease duration: 9 years), 60.9% had previously been treated with biologic (b) or targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs (Table 1). Of the patients with 6-month data, 25.4% (70/276) and 74.6% (206/276) achieved CDAI remission (primary endpoint) and LDA, respectively, after 6 months of UPA 15 mg treatment (Figure 1). DAS28(CRP) < 2.6 and ≤3.2 at Month 6 were achieved by 65.2% (178/273) and 79.1% (216/273) of patients, respectively. The percentage of patients achieving any definition of LDA (DAS28[CRP] ≤3.2, CDAI ≤10, or SDAI ≤11) or remission (DAS28[CRP] < 2.6, CDAI ≤2.8, or Boolean remission) at 6 months was similar among those treated with UPA monotherapy (72.9%) or UPA + MTX (74.1%). Disease activity and patient-reported outcomes (including pain, fatigue, and physical function) improved within the first 6 months following initiation of UPA 15 mg (Figure 2). The safety profile of UPA 15 mg was consistent with that seen in the Phase 3 trials with no new safety signals.1–6

Conclusion: Consistent with previous clinical data, the 6-month interim results from this study suggest that UPA as monotherapy or in combination with MTX is associated with a favorable benefit–risk profile in real-world patients with RA.

  1. Smolen JS, et al. Lancet 2019;393:2303–11.
  2. Burmester GR, et al. Lancet 2018;391:2503–12.
  3. Genovese MC, et al. Lancet 2018;391:2513–24.
  4. van Vollenhoven R, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72:1607–20.
  5. Fleischmann R, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:1788–800.
  6. Rubbert-Roth A, et al. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1511–21.

Table. Baseline characteristics

Figure 1. Proportions of patients achieving CDAI remission/LDA, SDAI remission/LDA, and DAS28(CRP) <2.6/≤3.2 over 6 months of upadacitinib treatment

Figure 2. Disease activity and patient-reported outcomes after 6 months of upadacitinib treatment


Disclosures: T. Witte, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Celgene, 5, Chugai, 5, Gilead, 5, Janssen, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, MSD, 5, Mylan, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5, Roche, 5, UCB, 5, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, 6; U. Kiltz, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Biocad, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Grünenthal, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Amgen, 5, Biogen, 5, Fresenius, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Roche, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6, Hexal, 2, 5, Chugai, 2, 5; F. Haas, AbbVie, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, Chugai, 5, MSD, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 5, Sanofi, 5; E. Riechers, AbbVie, 2, 5, Chugai, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Janssen, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 5, UCB, 2, 5; U. Prothmann, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Chugai, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5, Roche, 5, Sanofi, 5, Sobi, 5, UCB, 5; D. Adolf, StatConsult, 3, 11; C. Holland, AbbVie, 3, 11; R. Hecht, AbbVie, 3, 11; A. Rössler, AbbVie, 3, 11; K. Famulla, AbbVie, 3, 11; K. Götz, AbbVie, 3, 11; K. Krüger, AbbVie, 2, 6, Biogen, 2, 6, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 6, Celltrion, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, Hexal, 2, Janssen, 6, Medac, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Roche, 6, UCB, 6, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, Sanofi-Aventis, 2, 6, Sandoz, 6, Rheumaakademie, 6, Update GmbH, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Witte T, Kiltz U, Haas F, Riechers E, Prothmann U, Adolf D, Holland C, Hecht R, Rössler A, Famulla K, Götz K, Krüger K. Effectiveness of Upadacitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in German Real-World Practice: Interim Results from a Post-Marketing Observational Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-upadacitinib-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-in-german-real-world-practice-interim-results-from-a-post-marketing-observational-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-upadacitinib-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-in-german-real-world-practice-interim-results-from-a-post-marketing-observational-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology