ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0383

Sex Differences in Severity and Progression of Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis: What We Have Learned from Clinical Trials

Elizabeth Volkmann1, Ning Li2, Michael Roth2, Carol Feghali-Bostwick3, Richard Silver4, DeAnna Baker Frost5, Shervin Assassi6, Grace Kim2, Jonathan Goldin2 and Donald Tashkin2, 1University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 2University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, 3The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 4Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, 5The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, 6University of Texas Houston McGovern Medical School, Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunogenetics, Houston, TX

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: gender, interstitial lung disease, Mortality, pulmonary, Scleroderma, Systemic

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Although systemic sclerosis (SSc) disproportionately affects females compared with males [1], observational studies have demonstrated higher mortality rates in males with SSc [2]. This may be due to a higher prevalence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in males [2], or external factors, such as delayed SSc diagnosis in males. The objective of this study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes of male and female participants of two RCTs for SSc: Scleroderma Lung Studies (SLS) I [3] and II [4].

Methods: SLS I randomized 158 SSc participants (47 Males) with ILD to 1 year of oral cyclophosphamide (CYC) versus placebo, followed by 1 year off treatment. SLS II randomized 142 SSc-ILD participants (37 Males) to 1 year of oral CYC, followed by 1 year of placebo, versus 2 years of mycophenolate (MMF). Both studies measured the FVC every 3 months during the study and performed HRCT scans at baseline and 12 (SLS I) and 24 (SLS II) months. Up to 12 (SLS I) and 8 (SLS II) years after randomization, we assessed morbidity and mortality outcomes. Joint models evaluated progression of ILD based on the course of the FVC and linear regression models evaluated radiographic changes in ILD. We compared survival using a log-rank test and used Cox proportional hazard modeling to determine the variables associated with survival.

Results: Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were similar for males and females of SLS I and II, with the exception of a higher prevalence of Caucasians in SLS I males (79% versus 58%, respectively). Additionally, males demonstrated more restrictive physiology in SLS I (lower FVC, TLC, DLCO) and II (lower DLCO) compared with females. In the placebo arm of SLS I, there was a trend for increased worsening of the FVC in males compared with females from 3 to 12 months (P=0.14). In the CYC arm of SLS I, there was no difference in the course of the FVC from 3 to 12 months (P=0.84). In the CYC arm of SLS II, males experienced a decline in the FVC from 3 to 12 months, whereas females experienced an improvement (P=0.0006). In the MMF arm of SLS II, males experienced less of an improvement in the FVC from 3 to 12 months compared with females (P=0.005). In SLS II (but not SLS I), males had increased radiographic progression of ILD based on quantitative imaging analysis, even after adjusting for treatment arm. Long-term survival was worse in males compared with females in both SLS I and II (Log Rank Test: P=0.08, P=0.03, respectively). After adjustment for baseline disease severity (FVC, skin score) and age, male sex was independently associated with increased mortality compared with females in SLS II (HR 2.42; P=0.01), but not SLS I (HR 1.14; P=0.63).

Conclusion: Data from two large RCTs in SSc-ILD demonstrated that males with SSc-ILD had evidence of increased ILD severity at baseline. Males also appeared to have increased progression of ILD both with and without treatment, as well as worse long-term survival. These findings are consistent with prior observational studies, and future studies are needed to understand the genetic and hormonal underpinnings for these important sex differences.

References

  1. Steen, et al. Arthritis Rheum 1997.
  2. People, et al. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2016.
  3. Tashkin, et al. NEJM 2006.
  4. Tashkin, et al. Lancet Resp Med 2016.

Figure 1. Time to death in males (dotted line) versus females (solid line) in SLS I.

Figure 2. Time to death in males (dotted line) versus females (solid line) in SLS II.


Disclosure: E. Volkmann, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, Forbius, 2, 5, Corbus, 2; N. Li, None; M. Roth, Genentech/Roche, 1; C. Feghali-Bostwick, None; R. Silver, Boehringer Ingelheim, 1, 2, Actelion, 1, Corbus, 1, Forbius, 1; D. Baker Frost, None; S. Assassi, Momenta, 1, corbus, 1, Integrity Continuing Education, 1, Boehringer Ingelheim, 1, 2, 3; G. Kim, None; J. Goldin, None; D. Tashkin, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Volkmann E, Li N, Roth M, Feghali-Bostwick C, Silver R, Baker Frost D, Assassi S, Kim G, Goldin J, Tashkin D. Sex Differences in Severity and Progression of Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis: What We Have Learned from Clinical Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sex-differences-in-severity-and-progression-of-interstitial-lung-disease-in-systemic-sclerosis-what-we-have-learned-from-clinical-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sex-differences-in-severity-and-progression-of-interstitial-lung-disease-in-systemic-sclerosis-what-we-have-learned-from-clinical-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology