ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 101

Rheumatology Care Utilization and Geographic Distance from Rheumatology Sites within the United States Veteran Affairs Health Care System

Jessica A. Walsh1, Zachary Burningham2, Chia-Chen Teng, MS3, Daniel O. Clegg4 and Brian C. Sauer, PhD3, 1University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 2SLC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, SLC IDEAS Center, Salt Lake City, UT, 3Salt Lake City VA Medical Center and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 4Division of Rheumatology, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Access to care, inflammatory arthritis, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondylarthritis and therapy

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Health Services Research - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Within the Veteran Affairs (VA) health care system, there are often large geographic distances between patients and rheumatology providers. The purpose of this study was to determine if Veterans with inflammatory arthritis (IA) living far from VA rheumatology sites utilize rheumatology providers and therapies less frequently than patients located close to rheumatology sites.

Methods: Veterans with IA were included if they had ≥2 international classification of diseases-9 (ICD9) codes for rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis, prior to the beginning of the study period (January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014). Geocoding was used to calculate the geographic distance between the coordinates of Veteran’s home and the nearest VA site with rheumatology services. Exposure to medications was determined by medication dispensation. Primary and secondary stop codes were used to identify rheumatology encounters, defined as face-to-face visits with a rheumatology provider. Data sources included the national Corporate Data Warehouse and the Managerial Cost and Accounting Pharmacy dispensing data.

Results: The study included 75,804 Veterans, with 61.2%, 28.4%, and 10.4% living <40 miles, 40-99 miles and ≥100 miles from the nearest rheumatology site, respectively.  The mean age ranged from 66.4 – 66.6, and 89 – 91% were male (Table 1).  Rheumatology encounter(s) occurred for 43.7%, 33.7%, and 24.3% of Veteran living <40 miles, 40-99 miles and ≥100 miles from a rheumatology site, respectively (Figure 1). Higher percentages of Veterans living within 40 miles of a VA rheumatology site were exposed to non-biologic DMARD(s), biologic DMARD(s), and corticosteroid(s), compared to Veterans living 40-99 miles or >100 miles from a VA rheumatology site (Figure 2).

Conclusion: Rheumatology encounters occurred for fewer Veterans with IA living farther from VA rheumatology sites than Veterans living closer to VA rheumatology sites.  Exposure to biologic DMARDs, non-biologic DMARDs, and corticosteroids was also associated with closer geographic proximity to VA rheumatology sites.   

Table 1. Demographics, rheumatology encounters, and exposure to therapies
 

<40 miles

n = 46,395

40-99 miles

n = 21,536

≥100 miles

n = 7,873 

 
 

No. (%) or ±SD

95% CI

No. (%) or ±SD

95% CI

No. (%) or ±SD

95% CI

Age, mean

66.4 ± 12.6

 

66.6 ± 11.7

 

66.4 ± 11.8

 

Male

41,270 (89.0)

 

19,601(91.0)

 

7,183 (91.2)

 

White Race

35,121 (75.7)

 

17,057 (79.2)

 

6,329 (80.4)

 

Black Race

6,463 (13.9)

 

2,064 (9.6)

 

466 (5.9)

 

Other Race†

1,123 (2.4)

 

372 (1.7)

 

267 (3.4)

 

Unknown Race ‡

3,688 (7.9)

 

2,043 (9.5)

 

811 (10.3)

 

# Veterans with ≥1 rheumatology encounter

20,742 (44.7)

44.3-45.2

7,365 (34.2)

33.6-34.8

1,953 (24.8)

23.9-25.8

# Veterans exposed to non-biologic DMARD(s)§

16,744 (36.1)

35.7-36.5

7,479 (34.7)

34.1-35.4

2,693 (34.2)

33.2-35.3

# Veterans exposed to biologic DMARD(s)§§

10,413 (22.4)

22.1-22.8

4,337 (20.1)

19.6-20.7

1,516 (19.3)

18.4-20.1

# Veterans exposed to corticosteroid(s)§§§

15,658 (33.7)

33.3-34.2

6,640 (30.8)

30.2-31.5

2,372 (30.1)

29.1-31.2

† Other Race includes American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and Asian
‡ Unknown race includes declined to answer, unknown by patient, and missing data
§Non-biologic DMARDS included apremilast, auranofin, azathioprine, chloroquine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, hydroxychloroquine, gold sodium thiomalate, leflunomide, methotrexate, minocycline, penicillamine, sulfasalazine, and tofacitinib
§§Biologic DMARDS included § Non-biologic DMARDS included adalimumab, anakinra, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, secukinumab, tocilizumab, and ustekinumab
§§§Corticosteroids included betamethasone,  cortisone, dexamethasone, hydrocortisone, methylprednisolone, prednisolone, prednisone, triamcinolone

Figure 1. Rheumatology encounter(s) and distance from closest VA rheumatology site

Figure 2. Exposure to therapy and distance from closest VA rheumatology site


Disclosure: J. A. Walsh, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 5,AbbVie, 5; Z. Burningham, Amgen, 2; C. C. Teng, MS, Amgen, 2; D. O. Clegg, Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P., 5; B. C. Sauer, PhD, Amgen, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Walsh JA, Burningham Z, Teng MS CC, Clegg DO, Sauer PhD BC. Rheumatology Care Utilization and Geographic Distance from Rheumatology Sites within the United States Veteran Affairs Health Care System [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatology-care-utilization-and-geographic-distance-from-rheumatology-sites-within-the-united-states-veteran-affairs-health-care-system/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatology-care-utilization-and-geographic-distance-from-rheumatology-sites-within-the-united-states-veteran-affairs-health-care-system/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology