ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2228

Brief Educational Intervention Improves Gout Patients’ Understanding of Their Disease

Slavica Bobic1, Mark Tratenberg1, Julia Ash1, Amy Wasserman2 and Kirk Sperber1, 1Rheumatology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, 2New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: gout, quality improvement, quality of care, rheumatic disease and rheumatic education

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Education Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:   To assess gout patients’ baseline knowledge of their disease and to measure knowledge improvement after brief educational session.

Methods:  In this study, 13 patients with history of gout were given a baseline telephone questionnaire with 11 questions about gout, disease management and medication side effects.  Points were given for each correct answer and total score was calculated with a maximum score of 12.5. With each incorrect answer, the patient was educated according to the guideline provided by American College of Rheumatology.  Time spent educating each patient was limited to no more than 10 minutes.  Data was also collected on duration of disease and patient highest level of school achieved.  Two weeks later each patient was called back and the same questionnaire was administered.  New post-educational score was calculated using the same methodology.  Post-educational activity score was compared with pre-educational activity score.  The difference was recorded as a percentage of improvement.

Results:   The baseline pre-educational knowledge score ranged from 1 to 11 with the mean score of 6.0.  Post-educational score ranged from 4 to 11.5 with the mean score of 8.8.  Eighty-five percent of patients improved their knowledge after the educational session.  Mean score for patients with high school and/or college improved by 50 percent.  Mean score for patients with no formal education improved by 136 percent.

Conclusion:   Brief educational intervention can have significant effect on how patients with gout understand their disease and medication side effects.  Patient with low educational level benefit from such activity the most. Further study is needed to determine if this improved understanding leads to better clinical outcomes and safety.


Disclosure: S. Bobic, None; M. Tratenberg, None; J. Ash, None; A. Wasserman, None; K. Sperber, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bobic S, Tratenberg M, Ash J, Wasserman A, Sperber K. Brief Educational Intervention Improves Gout Patients’ Understanding of Their Disease [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/brief-educational-intervention-improves-gout-patients-understanding-of-their-disease/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/brief-educational-intervention-improves-gout-patients-understanding-of-their-disease/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology