ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0691

Denosumab Did Not Improve Computerized Tomography Erosion Scores When Added to Intensive Urate-Lowering Therapy in Gout: Results from a Pilot Study

Angelo Gaffo1, Kenneth Saag2, Anthony Doyle3, Joshua Melnick4, Anne Horne5, Jeffrey Foster1, Amy Mudano1, Stephanie Biggers1, David Redden1 and Nicola Dalbeth6, 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2University of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Birmingham, AL, 3University of Auckland, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand, 4University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Vestavia Hills, AL, 5The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 6University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Biomarkers, Computed tomography (CT), Erosions, gout

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Bone erosion is a common complication of tophaceous gout. Disordered osteoclast activity has been implicated in the pathogenesis of gouty bone erosion.  We sought to determine if the addition of denosumab to intensive urate-lowering therapy (ULT) improves gouty bone erosion through targeting receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL).

Methods: Open-label, parallel-group pilot randomized controlled trial in which 20 participants with gout with at least one confirmed conventional radiographic foot bone erosion were assigned in a 1:1 allocation to receive denosumab (60 mg subcutaneous every 6 months) added to intensive ULT (serum urate  ≤5 mg/dL or 300 µmol/L at the time of randomization and continued for the duration of the study) or intensive ULT alone. The primary outcome was the change in the foot computed tomography (CT) bone erosion score from baseline to 12 months. Erosion score was assessed by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist blinded to study assignment. Secondary outcomes included change in serum c-terminal telopeptide (CTX), functional status by Health Assessment Questionnaire-II, physical and mental health by Short Form Health Survey 12 and pain scores by visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results: The mean age of all study participants was 65.0 (SD 12.4) years and 19/20 were men. Mean disease duration was 15 (SD 9.3) years, serum urate at randomization was 4.3 (0.6) mg/dL and the mean CT erosion score was 6.8 (SD 5.1). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the denosumab and active comparator groups (Table 1). There was no interval change in CT erosion score in either the denosumab or active comparator group after one year of follow-up (Table 2).  Serum CTX declined markedly in the denosumab group compared with the active comparator group. Other secondary outcomes did not change between groups (Table 2). One patient developed atrial fibrillation (on denosumab) and another atrial flutter (on active comparator). There were no serious adverse events and no events led to study discontinuation.

Conclusion: In this one-year pilot study, denosumab did not offer additional benefit to intensive urate lowering therapy for gouty bone erosion.

TABLE 1. Baseline characteristics of participants. Unless stated, data are shown as mean ± SD.

TABLE 2. Primary and Secondary Study Endpoints. Unless stated, data are shown as mean ± SD.


Disclosure: A. Gaffo, Amgen, 1; K. Saag, Arthrosi, 5, Horizon Therapeutics plc, 2, 5, Atom Bioscience, 5, LG Pharma, 5, Takeda, 5, Mallinkrodt, 5, SOBI, 2, 5, Shanton, 2; A. Doyle, None; J. Melnick, None; A. Horne, None; J. Foster, None; A. Mudano, None; S. Biggers, None; D. Redden, None; N. Dalbeth, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, Abbvie, 1, Arthrosi, 1, Dyve BioSciences, 1, Selecta, 1, Janssen, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gaffo A, Saag K, Doyle A, Melnick J, Horne A, Foster J, Mudano A, Biggers S, Redden D, Dalbeth N. Denosumab Did Not Improve Computerized Tomography Erosion Scores When Added to Intensive Urate-Lowering Therapy in Gout: Results from a Pilot Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/denosumab-did-not-improve-computerized-tomography-erosion-scores-when-added-to-intensive-urate-lowering-therapy-in-gout-results-from-a-pilot-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/denosumab-did-not-improve-computerized-tomography-erosion-scores-when-added-to-intensive-urate-lowering-therapy-in-gout-results-from-a-pilot-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology