ACR Convergence 2020

November 5-9, 2020. All Virtual.

View by Number View by Title View Sessions

View by Date

Abstract Number: 1344

Guselkumab, an IL-23 Inhibitor That Specifically Binds to the IL23p19-Subunit, for Active Psoriatic Arthritis: One Year Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Patients Who Were Biologic-Naïve or TNFα Inhibitor-Experienced
Abstract Number: 1345

Upadacitinib as Monotherapy and in Combination with Non-biologic DMARDs for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: Subgroup Analysis from Two Phase 3 Trials
Abstract Number: 1346

Predicting Major Treatment Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitorsin Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis
Abstract Number: 1347

Predictors of Response in Patients with Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Receiving Certolizumab Pegol in the C-axSpAnd Study
Abstract Number: 1348

What Influence Do Clinical Domains Other Than Arthritis Have on Composite Clinical Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis?: Comparison of Treatment Effects in the SEAM-PsA Trial
Abstract Number: 1349

Guselkumab Provides Domain-Specific and Comprehensive Efficacy as Assessed Using Composite Endpoints in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis
Abstract Number: 1350

Safety Profile of Upadacitinib in Psoriatic Arthritis: Integrated Analysis from Two Phase 3 Trials
Abstract Number: 1351

Efficacy of Ixekizumab versus Adalimumab in Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Patients with and Without Moderate-to-severe Psoriasis: 52-week Results from a Multicentre, Randomised Open-label Study
Abstract Number: 1352

Bimekizumab Maintenance of Response in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: 2-Year Results from a Phase 2b Dose-Ranging Study and Its Open-Label Extension
Abstract Number: 1353

Achievement of Remission Is Associated with Improvement in Functionality in Certolizumab Pegol-Treated Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis, Irrespective of Pre-Existing Radiographic Structural Damage
Abstract Number: 1354

The Effect of 8 Years of TNF-α Blocking Therapy on Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis
Abstract Number: 1355

Characterization of Remission in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with Upadacitinib: Post-hoc Analysis from Two Phase 3 Trials
Abstract Number: 1356

Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Stratified by Number of Prior Biologic Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs
Abstract Number: 1357

Comparative Efficacy of Janus Kinase Inhibitors and TNF Inhibitors in Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Network Meta-Analysis
Abstract Number: 1358

Certolizumab Pegol Efficacy in Patients with Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Stratified by Baseline MRI and C-Reactive Protein Status

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].