ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0749

Virtual Care in Rheumatology Ambulatory Clinics During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Patient/Family and Healthcare Provider Perspectives and Experiences

Whitney Hung, Carina Majaesic, Katharina Kovacs Burns, Aisha Bruce and Elaine Yacyshyn, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Access to care, COVID-19, Health Care, Qualitative Research, Surveys

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Health Services Research Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: With the expansion of virtual care during COVID-19, a cross-sectional study was designed to explore the experiences of adult patients and their families (PFs), as well as healthcare providers (HCPs), with virtual care in ambulatory medicine within Alberta Health Services, Canada.

Methods: A randomly selected 10-15% of PFs and 200 HCPs in seven ambulatory care clinics, including adult Rheumatology, were invited to complete a telephone or online survey, respectively. Quantitative and qualitative questions for both surveys included virtual care appointment set-ups as compared with in-person visits, associated benefits, impacts of virtual care, preferences for future appointments, and improvement suggestions. Data for both surveys were descriptively analyzed. The subset of PFs and HCPs from the Rheumatology Clinic was then extracted and analyzed separately as well.

Results: Of 27 Rheumatology Clinic PFs who completed the telephone survey, 63% rated their overall experience with the virtual clinic appointment setup as ‘excellent’ (i.e. 8,9, or 10 out of 10) versus 36% of 14 HCPs who responded. Half of HCPs felt that all necessary information for clinical decision-making was captured during video and telephone appointments. However, very few felt that the use of video (14%) or telephone appointments (7%) negatively affected patient care when compared to in-person appointments despite concerns from other colleagues, which included lack of physical exams, patients having difficulty navigating the technology, and virtual appointments taking longer to set up and conduct. PFs had mixed views, with 63% feeling that their discussions with HCPs did not go as well during their virtual appointment as in previous in-person visits. Similarly, 52% felt confident that these appointments were just as good as in-person appointments despite the majority rating the actual virtual appointment experiences as ‘excellent.’ Advantages of virtual appointments noted by HCPs and PFs included convenience, reduced costs, and decreased risk of COVID-19 exposure. Thirty-six percent and 43% of HCPs having video and telephone appointments, respectively, preferred to continue with these corresponding appointments. Comparatively, 53% of PFs preferred to continue with virtual appointments, while 44% desired in-person appointments.

Conclusion: PFs and HCPs would like to see virtual care become a regular option for healthcare delivery beyond the pandemic. Such implementation will require expansion of health system supports and technologies, guidelines for virtual care practices and policies. This study provides a cross-sectional snapshot of key aspects of virtual care experiences of both PFs and HCPs within the same ambulatory clinics, with focus on Rheumatology, during the first year of COVID-19. Additional cross-sectional repeat studies and others correlating virtual care experiences with outcome measures are needed.


Disclosures: W. Hung, None; C. Majaesic, None; K. Kovacs Burns, None; A. Bruce, None; E. Yacyshyn, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hung W, Majaesic C, Kovacs Burns K, Bruce A, Yacyshyn E. Virtual Care in Rheumatology Ambulatory Clinics During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Patient/Family and Healthcare Provider Perspectives and Experiences [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/virtual-care-in-rheumatology-ambulatory-clinics-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-patient-family-and-healthcare-provider-perspectives-and-experiences/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/virtual-care-in-rheumatology-ambulatory-clinics-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-patient-family-and-healthcare-provider-perspectives-and-experiences/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology