ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1290

Validation of a Novel Lupus Multivariable Outcome Score as an Outcome Measure for Systemtic Lupus Erythematosus Trials

Michal Abrahamowicz1 and Peter Lipsky2, 1McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada, 2AMPEL BioSolutions, Charlottesville, VA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Outcome measures, Randomized Trial, Statistical methods, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster III: Outcomes (1257–1303)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Development of effective new Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) treatments requires a validated responder index responsive to clinically meaningful change and relevant to clinical practice. To address this challenge, we have recently developed a new Lupus Multivariable Outcome Score (LuMOS) to optimize discrimination between outcomes of actively treated patients versus those randomized to placebo [1]. We now report on external validation of LuMOS in two independent SLE clinical trials.

Methods: Validation was carried out in the Illuminate trials used to evaluate tabalumab (TB) in SLE. All participants in both Illuminate 1 and 2 clinical trials met the ACR classification criteria for SLE and all were included in our analyses. To adapt LuMOS for use with laboratory results assessed on different platforms than used in the trials of belimumab employed to generate the original LuMOS outcome score [1], we calculated a standardized score using z-score transformation. For validation, in each of the Illuminate trials, we calculated LuMOS scores at week 52 for all participants receiving either placebo or one of 2 dosage regimens of TB. Cohen D Effect Size (ES), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), assessed the ability of LuMOS to discriminate between outcomes in active treatment groups versus placebo, and compared it with SRI-5 responder index used in the trials.

Results: LuMOS using standardized z-score transformed laboratory data worked comparably to the original LuMOS model in the original data from the belimumab trials and was then applied to the Illuminate data sets. LuMOS-based ES for both TB groups in both trials indicated highly significant (p< 0.0001), moderately strong treatment effects (ES >0.4), in contrast to weak effects (ES< 0.25) based on SRI-5, that were statistically non-significant for Illuminate-1, as reflected by the 95% CI’s that included 0 (Table).

Conclusion: LuMOS improves the ability to detect statistically significant treatment effects. Further validation in SLE trials of non-B cell directed treatments is necessary to document utility as an outcome measure independent of drug mechanism.

[1] Abrahamowicz et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70:1450-58.

Comparison of Effect Sizes of LuMOS vs. SRI-5 for discrimination between TB-treated and placebo groups n Illuminate_1/_2 trials


Disclosures: M. Abrahamowicz, None; P. Lipsky, Horizon, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Abrahamowicz M, Lipsky P. Validation of a Novel Lupus Multivariable Outcome Score as an Outcome Measure for Systemtic Lupus Erythematosus Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/validation-of-a-novel-lupus-multivariable-outcome-score-as-an-outcome-measure-for-systemtic-lupus-erythematosus-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/validation-of-a-novel-lupus-multivariable-outcome-score-as-an-outcome-measure-for-systemtic-lupus-erythematosus-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology