ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1926

Use of 18F-FDG PET in Assessing Response to Treatment in Adults with Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: A Systematic Literature Review

Koushan Kouranloo1, Mathangi Krishnakumar2 and Mrinalini Dey3, 1Rheumatology & Internal Medicine Trainee- Surrey, UK. Education fellow University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 2Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, United Kingdom, 3Queen Elizabeth Hospital, London, United Kingdom; University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Imaging, pulmonary

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (1913–1944) Miscellaneous Rheumatic & Inflammatory Diseases Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Sarcoidosis is a chronic, multisystem, granulomatous disease commonly affecting the lungs. Immunosuppressants, particularly corticosteroids, are the mainstay of treatment. Symptoms, severity and response to treatment can follow a heterogenous pattern, presenting a clinical challenge. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging with the use of Fludeoxyglucose F18 (18F-FDG) has been recommended by the American Thoracic Society guidelines in choosing an appropriate biopsy site.Use of 18F-FDG PET in disease monitoring remains uncertain. We undertook a systematic literature review (SLR) on the use of 18F-FDG PET in assessing response to treatment in adults with pulmonary sarcoidosis.

Methods: The protocol was registered on Prospero (CRD42023416412). All published articles discussing PET CT use in response to treatment in pulmonary sarcoidosis were included, until March 2023, in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Databases. The search was restricted to English-language articles. All article types were eligible except opinion pieces, case reports, case series of ≤10 patients and reviews. Articles meeting inclusion criteria were examined by one author, with 20% validity screening. In addition to basic demographics, information was extracted on: Siltzbach classification of subjects; treatment; additional tests performed; time between baseline and follow-up PET CT.

Results: Initially, 1759 articles were retrieved with 8 ultimately included (4 prospective; 3 retrospective; 1 case-control). A pooled total of 260 patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis were included, 40.7% male, mean age 47.0 years (SD 3.4). Study populations were from France (n=1), China (n=1), The Netherlands (n=1), Turkey (n=1), India (n=2) and Serbia (n=2). Treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis varied markedly amongst the included studies, including: infliximab (n=1) and systemic corticosteroids (n=3); treatment was unknown in 4 studies. All studies used 18F-FDG-PET, except one in which gallium-67 scintigraphy was also used. Time between baseline PET CT and follow-up scan ranged from 2.8 weeks to 12 months. Compared to clinical response, sensitivity of PET CT in determining response to treatment ranged from 56% to 100%, with mean sensitivity of 75.3% (SD 16.0). Additional tests performed across all studies included spirometry, chest radiograph, serum angiotensin-converting-enzyme levels, soluble interleukin-2 receptor levels. All studies concluded that PET CT correlates with clinical response to treatment and is useful for prognostication, aside from one study which concluded that metabolic response on PET CT can predict future risk of relapses but does not correlate with clinical response.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first SLR summarising the use of 18F-FDG PET in assessing response to treatment in adults with pulmonary sarcoidosis. 18F-FDG-PET is useful in determining response to treatment and prognosis in pulmonary sarcoidosis, and may have a role in predicting future response. Further work in greater patient numbers is required to confirm the utility of PET CT in the management of pulmonary sarcoidosis.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1:
Flow diagram of stages of systematic literature review.
Cochrane Library encompasses library of: systematic reviews; systematic review protocols; controlled clinical trials.


Disclosures: K. Kouranloo: None; M. Krishnakumar: None; M. Dey: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kouranloo K, Krishnakumar M, Dey M. Use of 18F-FDG PET in Assessing Response to Treatment in Adults with Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: A Systematic Literature Review [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-18f-fdg-pet-in-assessing-response-to-treatment-in-adults-with-pulmonary-sarcoidosis-a-systematic-literature-review/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-18f-fdg-pet-in-assessing-response-to-treatment-in-adults-with-pulmonary-sarcoidosis-a-systematic-literature-review/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology