ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 968

Urinary Soluble CD163, an M2 Macrophage Marker, Reflects the Renal Disease Activity in Lupus Nephritis: A Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Assessment

Ranjan Gupta1, Akhilesh Yadav2 and Amita Aggarwal1, 1Clinical Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India, 2Department of Clinical Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: longitudinal studies, lupus nephritis and macrophages, SLE, Urinary Biomarkers

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment I: Nephritis

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Alternatively activated (M2) macrophages are the major macrophage subtype infiltrating the glomeruli in lupus nephritis (LN). CD163 is a marker of M2 macrophages. In urine, soluble CD163 (sCD163), which is the shed form of CD163, may reflect the activation of M2 macrophages in kidney. Thus, it may serve as a biomarker for identification and assessment of treatment response in patients with LN.

Methods: Patients with SLE with active nephritis (AN), active disease without nephritis (active non-renal; ANR) and inactive disease (ID) were enrolled. Disease activity was assessed using SLEDAI and renal SLEDAI (rSLEDAI). Patients in AN group were treated according to the ACR guidelines and followed up every 3 months for 1 year. Urine and plasma samples were collected at baseline for all and every 3 months in AN group. Urine samples from 25 healthy subjects (HC) and 20 patients of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) served as controls. Plasma sCD163 (pCD163) and urinary sCD163 were measured using ELISA and urinary values were normalized for creatinine excretion. Variables are expressed as median (range) and non-parametric tests were used for analysis.

Results: A total of 122 SLE patients (females 114) were enrolled.  At baseline, normalized urinary sCD163 (uCD163) was significantly higher in AN group as compared to ANR, ID, HC and RA (p-value <0.001 for all). uCD163 showed good correlation with protein:creatinine ratio (r=0.55; p-value <0.001), rSLEDAI (r=0.47, p-value <0.001) and SLEDAI (r=0.3, p-value <0.001) but not with pCD163 levels (r=0.23). uCD163 but not pCD163 could differentiate between AN and ANR groups (Table 1) and on ROC analysis, uCD163 (AUC=0.76) performed better than pCD163, C3, C4 and anti-ds DNA antibodies. In the longitudinal study, with reduction in disease activity, uCD163 also decreased significantly at all follow-up visits as compared to baseline (p-value <0.001) (Table 2). pCD163 also decreased significantly but had an erratic and irregular trend. uCD163 and not pCD163 showed a rise before conventional markers in 4 patients who relapsed within 1 year of follow-up.

Conclusion: uCD163 is a potential biomarker of LN disease activity. Among patients with active SLE, it helps differentiate between patients with and without LN. It shows modest correlation with renal disease activity and has a potential to predict relapse of LN.

Table1: Baseline characteristics of SLE patients in the three categories  

Active Nephritis (AN) Active Non-Renal (ANR) Inactive Disease (ID)
Number 57 23 42
F:M 55:2 18:5 41:1
Median age (yrs) 27 (12 – 50) 29 (15 – 50) 28 (14 – 48)
rSLEDAI 8 (4 – 16) 0 (0) 0 (0)
SLEDAI 18 (6 – 28) 10 (5 – 20) 2 (0 – 4)
C3 (mg/dl) 47.1 (<16.9 – 156) 48.6 (17.3 – 139) 113.5 (34.2 – 194)
C4 (mg/dl) 7.6 (<5.6 – 56) 9.4 (<5.6 – 26) 22.1 (6 – 45)
Anti-ds DNA (IU/ml) 200 (24 – >300) 185 (<6.25 – >300) 59.95 (<6.25 – 200)
UPr/UCr ratio 3.37 (0.3 – 20.25) 0.38 (0.03 – 1.46) 0.09 (0 – 10.69)
Serum Creatinine (mg/dl) 0.9 (0.4 – 3.87) 0.82 (0.6 – 1.25) 0.8 (0.4 – 1.3)
Plasma sCD163 (ng/ml) 2837.1 (701.3 – 7433.2) 2759 (619.8 – 9931) 1503.6 (564.5 – 3142.8)***
UCD163/UCr (x 100 pg/mg) 127 (0 – 1435) 3.82 (0 – 179)*** 10.34 (0 – 1923)***

     p-value ***= <0.001 as compared to AN group Table 2. Change in different disease activity parameters, plasma and normalized urinary sCD163 in the active nephritis group with treatment over 1 year

Baseline 3 months 6 months 9 months 12 months
rSLEDAI 8 (4 – 16) 0 (0 – 12) 0 (0 – 4) 0 (0 – 8) 0 (0 – 8)
SLEDAI 18 (6 – 28) 2 (0 – 14) 2 (0 – 6) 2 (0 – 10) 2 (0 – 15)
C3 (mg/dl) 47.1 (<16.9 – 156) 85.9 (7 – 161) 93.9 (47.1 – 174) 89.7 (33.4 – 168) 103 (35 – 165)
C4 (mg/dl) 7.6 (<5.6 – 56) 17.4 (<5.6 – 73.7) 19.6 (<5.6 – 61.1) 20.1 (<5.6 – 76.5) 19.6 (<5.6 – 79)
Anti-ds DNA (IU) 200 (24 – >300) 60.4 (6.1 – >300) 54.6 (<6.25 – 300) 67.45 (<6.5 – 300) 53.4 (<6.5 – 300)
UPr/UCr ratio 3.37 (0.3 – 20.25) 0.35 (0 – 13.55) 0.4 (0 – 8.69) 0.3 (0 – 6.98) 0.25 (0 – 6.25)
Serum Creatinine (mg/dl) 0.9 (0.4 – 3.87) 0.77 (0 – 4.12) 0.8 (056 – 1.7) 0.79 (0.4 – 1.3) 0.81 (0.4 – 1.3)
Plasma SCD163 (ng/ml) 2837.1 (701.3 – 7433.2) 1409.5 (393.7 – 4162.1)*** 1071.6 (246.6 – 2753.8) *** 1307.7 (555.9 – 3580)*** 1141.7 (398 – 4124)***
USCD163/UCr (x 100 pg/mg) 127 (0 – 1435) 19.7 (0 – 534.9)*** 12.7 (0 – 580.5)*** 11.9 (0 – 113)*** 7.2 (0 – 378)***

   p-value ***= <0.001 as compared to baseline values


Disclosure: R. Gupta, None; A. Yadav, None; A. Aggarwal, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gupta R, Yadav A, Aggarwal A. Urinary Soluble CD163, an M2 Macrophage Marker, Reflects the Renal Disease Activity in Lupus Nephritis: A Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Assessment [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/urinary-soluble-cd163-an-m2-macrophage-marker-reflects-the-renal-disease-activity-in-lupus-nephritis-a-cross-sectional-and-longitudinal-assessment/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/urinary-soluble-cd163-an-m2-macrophage-marker-reflects-the-renal-disease-activity-in-lupus-nephritis-a-cross-sectional-and-longitudinal-assessment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology