ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2071

Urinary Osteoprotegerin As Biomarker of Lupus Nephritis Disease Activity: Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Study

Ranjan Gupta1, Amita Aggarwal2, Sudhir sinha3, Liza Rajasekhar4, Akhilesh Yadav1, Priyanka Gaur1, Ramnath Misra2 and Virsingh Negi5, 1Department of Clinical Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India, 2Clinical Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India, 3Department of Biochemistry, CSIR-central drug research institute, Lucknow, India, 4Department of Rheumatology, Nizam Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India, 5Department of Clinical Immunology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: longitudinal studies, lupus nephritis and osteoprotegerin, SLE, Urinary Biomarkers

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment III: Biomarkers

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose:

Urinary biomarkers may help in identification, treatment and assessment of response to therapy in patients with lupus nephritis (LN). Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is produced by the kidney and may reflect the renal disease activity better than conventional markers. The data on its utility is sparse. 

Methods:

Patients with SLE with active nephritis (AN), active disease without nephritis (active non-renal; ANR) and inactive disease (ID) were enrolled. Disease activity was assessed using renal SLEDAI (rSLEDAI) and SLEDAI. Patients with active nephritis were treated according to the ACR guidelines and followed up every 3 months for 1 year. Urine and serum samples were collected at baseline for all and every 3 months in patients of AN group. Urine samples from 24 healthy subjects (HC) and 20 patients each of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and diabetic nephropathy (DM) served as controls. Serum (sOPG) and urinary OPG were measured using ELISA and urinary values were normalized for creatinine excretion. Variables are expressed as median (range) and non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results:

A total of 121 SLE patients (females 113) were enrolled.  At baseline, normalized urinary OPG (uOPG) was significantly higher in AN group as compared to ANR, ID, HC and DM (p-value <0.001 for all) but it was not different from RA. At baseline, uOPG correlated modestly with rSLEDAI (r=0.4, p-value <0.001) and SLEDAI (r=0.317, p-value <0.001) but not with sOPG levels. uOPG but not sOPG could differentiate between AN and ANR groups (Table 1).

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of SLE patients in the three categories

 

Active Nephritis (AN)

Active Non-Renal (ANR)

Inactive Disease (ID)

Number

58

24

39

F:M

56:2

19:5

38:1

Median age (yrs)

27 (12 – 50)

28.5 (15 – 50)

28 (14 – 48)

rSLEDAI

8 (4 – 16)

0 (0)

0 (0)

SLEDAI

18 (6 – 28)

10 (5 – 20)

2 (0 – 4)

C3 (mg/dl)

48.5 (<16.9 – 125)

66.7 (17.3 – 163)

117 (34.2 – 194)

C4 (mg/dl)

7.8 (<5.6 – 55.7)

11.05 (<5.6 – 32.2)

24.15 (5.6 – 44.7)

Anti-ds DNA (IU/ml)

200 (24.7 – >300)

186.3 (<6.25 – >300)

51.35 (<6.25 – 200)

UPr/UCr ratio

3.3.7 (0.3 – 20.25)

0.37 (0.01 – 1.46)

0.11 (0 – 10.69)

Serum Creatinine (mg/dl)

0.9 (0.4 – 3.87)

0.82 (0.4 – 1.4)

0.8 (0.4 – 1.3)

Serum OPG (pg/ml)

1492.86 (624.09 – 4137.88)

1280.33 (116.16 – 2048.13)

1213.28 (368.37 – 1899.83)**

UOPG/UCr (x 100 pg/mg)

12.29 (0 – 85.77)

2.36 (0 – 147.13)***

4.63 (0.07 – 42.53)***

p-value **= <0.01 and ***= <0.001 as compared to AN group

In the longitudinal study, uOPG decreased significantly at 3 and 6 months visits as compared to baseline (p-value <0.001) along with reduction in disease activity (Table 2). It showed an insignificant rise at 9 and 12 months. sOPG trends did not correlate with disease activity.

uOPG and not sOPG showed a rise before conventional markers in 2 patients who relapsed at 11 and 12 months respectively. Similarly, in 2 patients who developed chronic kidney disease, uOPG values remained persistently high throughout whereas sOPG did not.

Table 2. Change in different disease activity parameters, serum and normalized urinary OPG in the active nephritis group with treatment over 1 year

 

Baseline

3 months

6 months

9 months

12 months

rSLEDAI

8 (4 – 16)

0 (0 – 12)

0 (0 – 4)

0 (0 – 4)

0 (0 – 8)

SLEDAI

18 (6 – 28)

2 (0 – 14)

2 (0 – 6)

2 (0 – 6)

2 (0 – 15)

C3 (mg/dl)

48.5 (16.9 – 125)

81.3 (7 – 161)

91.6 (47.1 – 174)

88.7 (33.4 – 168)

99.1 (35 – 165)

C4 (mg/dl)

7.8 (<5.6 – 55.7)

17.6 (<5.6 – 73.7)

19.6 (<5.6 – 61.1)

20.1 (<5.6 – 76.5)

19.2 (<5.6 – 58.4)

Anti-ds DNA (IU)

200 (24.7 – >300)

74.2 (8.4 – >300)

53.75 (<6.25 – 300)

72 (<6.5 – 300)

63.8 (<6.5 – 300)

UPr/UCr ratio

3.3.7 (0.3 – 20.25)

0.35 (0 – 13.55)

0.62 (0 – 3.98)

0.22 (0 – 6.98)

0.24 (0 – 6.25)

Serum Creatinine (mg/dl)

0.9 (0.4 – 3.87)

0.77 (0 – 4.12)

0.8 (056 – 1.7)

0.79 (0.4 – 1.3)

0.81 (0.4 – 1.3)

Serum OPG (pg/ml)

1492.86

(624.09 – 4137.88)

981.94

(591.57 – 1627.59)***

1219.74

(453.42 – 1916.27)**

826.79

(270.7 – 1872.65)***

1151.02

(0 – 1578.99)***

UOPG/UCr (x 100 pg/mg)

12.29 (0 – 85.77)

4.66 (0.3 – 48.74)**

1.04 (0 – 15.98)***

3.25 (0 – 40.25)***

5.55 (0.06 – 67.71)***

p-value **= <0.01 and ***= <0.001 as compared to baseline values

Conclusion:

uOPG is derived from kidneys and among patients with active SLE, it helps differentiate between patients with and without LN. It shows modest correlation with disease activity and has a potential to predict poor response to therapy and relapse of LN.


Disclosure: R. Gupta, None; A. Aggarwal, None; S. sinha, None; L. Rajasekhar, None; A. Yadav, None; P. Gaur, None; R. Misra, None; V. Negi, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gupta R, Aggarwal A, sinha S, Rajasekhar L, Yadav A, Gaur P, Misra R, Negi V. Urinary Osteoprotegerin As Biomarker of Lupus Nephritis Disease Activity: Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/urinary-osteoprotegerin-as-biomarker-of-lupus-nephritis-disease-activity-cross-sectional-and-longitudinal-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/urinary-osteoprotegerin-as-biomarker-of-lupus-nephritis-disease-activity-cross-sectional-and-longitudinal-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology