ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 690

Urinary MRP8/14, an Endogenous Toll-Like Receptor 4 Ligand, Reflects Renal Disease Activity in Lupus Nephritis: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Assessment

Ranjan Gupta1, Dipendra Kumar Mitra 1 and Sonam Rani 1, 1All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: calprotectin and longitudinal studies, Lupus nephritis, SLE, Urinary Biomarkers

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: SLE – Clinical Poster I: Epidemiology & Pathogenesis

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Monocytes/macrophages are the most abundant cells infiltrating the glomeruli and in the active urinary sediment of patients with Lupus Nephritis (LN).1 These cells also have relative abundance of Toll Like Receptor 4 (TLR4) as compared to other white blood cells.2 Therefore MRP8/14 (Calprotectin), an endogenous TLR4 ligand, could be responsible for their activation in LN and may serve as a biomarker of renal disease activity in urine.

Methods: SLE patients with active nephritis (AN), active disease without nephritis (active non-renal; ANR) and inactive disease (ID) were enrolled. Disease activity was assessed using SLEDAI and renal SLEDAI (rSLEDAI). Patients in AN group were treated according to the ACR 2012 guidelines and followed up every 3 months for 1 year. AN disease was defined as SLEDAI ≥5 with rSLEDAI ≥4, ANR was defined as SLEDAI ≥5 with rSLEDAI =0 and ID was defined as SLEDAI ≤4 with rSLEDAI =0. Urine and serum samples were collected at baseline for all patients and at every 3 months for 1 year in AN group. Urine samples from 10 healthy subjects (HC) and 10 patients of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) served as controls. Serum MRP8/14 (sMRP8/14) and urinary MRP8/14 (uMRP8/14) were measured using commercially available ELISA kits (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and urinary values were normalized for creatinine excretion. Variables are expressed as median (range) and non-parametric tests were used for analysis. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: A total of 52 SLE patients (F:M = 49:3) were enrolled. Among these, 32 were in AN category whereas 10 patients each were enrolled in ANR and ID categories. Complete response rates at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months were 24%, 42%, 50% and 50% respectively and 3 patients expired at 3 months because of high disease activity. At baseline, normalized uMRP8/14 (ng/mg of creatinine) was significantly higher in AN group [4464 (569-128894)] as compared to ANR [1167 (4-18357)], ID [438 (147-4320)], HC [1348 (3-2726)] and RA [339 (6-11519)] (p-value < 0.05) groups. At baseline, uMRP8/14 showed good correlation with urinary protein:creatinine ratio (r=0.55; p-value< 0.001), rSLEDAI (r=0.5, p-value < 0.001) and SLEDAI (r=0.3, p-value < 0.001) but not with sMRP8/14 (r=0.25). Baseline uMRP8/14 but not sMRP8/14 could differentiate between AN and ANR groups (Table 1) and on ROC analysis, uMRP8/14 (AUC=0.8) performed better than sMRP8/14 (AUC=0.72), C3 (AUC=0.67), C4 (AUC=0.35) and anti-ds DNA antibodies (AUC=0.58) (Figure 1). On follow-up of AN patients, with a reduction in disease activity, uMRP8/14 also decreased significantly at 6,9 and 12 months visits as compared to baseline (p-value < 0.05) (Table 2). sMRP8/14 also decreased significantly at 6 and 9 months but had an erratic and irregular trend. uMRP8/14 also showed a rise before conventional markers in 6 patients who relapsed within 1 year of follow-up requiring change of therapy.

Conclusion: uMRP8/14 is a potential biomarker of LN disease activity. In patients with active SLE, it helps differentiate between patients with and without renal involvement. It correlates with renal disease activity and has a potential to predict relapse of LN.

References:

  1. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Apr 3;17:94
  2. Front Immunol. 2014 Jul 10;5:316


Table 1

Table1: Baseline characteristics of SLE patients in the three categories


Table 2

Table 2. Change in different disease activity parameters, serum and normalized urinary MRP8/14 in the active nephritis group with treatment over 1 year


Figure 1

Figure 1. ROC analysis at baseline for conventional disease activity parameters and serum and urinary MRP8/14 levels


Disclosure: R. Gupta, None; D. Mitra, None; S. Rani, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gupta R, Mitra D, Rani S. Urinary MRP8/14, an Endogenous Toll-Like Receptor 4 Ligand, Reflects Renal Disease Activity in Lupus Nephritis: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Assessment [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/urinary-mrp8-14-an-endogenous-toll-like-receptor-4-ligand-reflects-renal-disease-activity-in-lupus-nephritis-a-cross-sectional-and-longitudinal-assessment/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/urinary-mrp8-14-an-endogenous-toll-like-receptor-4-ligand-reflects-renal-disease-activity-in-lupus-nephritis-a-cross-sectional-and-longitudinal-assessment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology