ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 168

Ultrasound Evaluation of the Efficacy of Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Dmards Toward Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Kyushu Multicenter Rheumatoid Arthritis Ultrasound Prospective Observational Cohort in Japan

Ayako Nishino1,2, Shin-ya Kawashiri1,2, Atsushi Kawakami1,2, Tamami Yoshitama2, Nobutaka Eiraku2, Noki Matsuoka2, Yukitaka Ueki2, Akitomo Okada2, Hiroaki Hamada2, Toshihiko Hidaka2, Shuji Nagano2, Tomomi Tsuru2, Keita Fujikawa2 and Yojiro Arinobu2, 1Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan, 2Kyushu multicenter rheumatoid arthritis ultrasound prospective observational cohort study group, Nagasaki, Japan

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Biologic agents, Biomarkers, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), therapy and ultrasonography

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster I: Ultrasound, Optical Imaging and Capillaroscopy

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Few prospective ultrasound (US) cohort studies of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated by biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) are reported. We have been prospectively investigating the course of active RA patients by US after b/tsDMARDs being introduced in Kyushu region, Japan from June, 2013. This is an interim report to explore the characteristic of RA patients classified as therapeutic responders evaluated by US after b/tsDMARDs being introduced. 

Methods: A total 150 RA patients were consecutively recruited from 12 rheumatology centers in  Kyushu region in Japan from June 2013 to June 2015. They gave their informed consent to be subjected to the protocol that was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nagasaki University. Disease activity was consecutively evaluated by both US and clinical composite measures such as DAS28, SDAI every 3 months after introduction of b/tsDMARDs therapies. Twenty-two joints including MCP, PIP and wrist joints of bilateral hands were assessed by US for gray scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) on semi-quantitative scale from 0 to 3 (each total scores from 0 to 66, respectively). The present data come from the first 6 months observation. We divided the patients into 2 groups by the mean total US scores at 6 months and the patients, total GS or PD score lower than the mean, were classified as therapeutic responders evaluated by US (US responders). We tried to find the characteristic of US responders at 6 months by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: Eighty-six (30 patients in TNF inhibitors, 30 patients in tocilizumab, 23 patients in abatacept, 3 patients in tofacitinib, respectively) out of 150 patients, who completed the first 6 months observation, were evaluated. In overall, total GS and PD scores improved significantly at 6 months as compared to the baseline (p < 0.001, respectively). The mean total GS scores at 6 months were 8 (declined from 13 at baseline) whereas PD scores were 3 (declined from 8 at baseline), respectively. Among the baseline variables including age, gender, disease duration, ACPA (%), RF (%), the use of prednisolone (%), the use of MTX (%), bDMARDs-naïve (%), ESR (mm/hr), CRP (mg/dl), DAS28-ESR, SDAI, total GS score and total PD score, multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that total GS score at baseline (odds ratio 0.84, 95% C.I. 0.76-0.92, p < 0.001) is the only predictor of GSUS responder at 6 months. In case of PD, total PD score at baseline (odds ratio 0.86, 95% C.I. 0.77-0.94, p < 0.001) and bDMARDs-naïve (odds ratio 3.83, 95% C.I. 1.29-12.32, p = 0.015) were the predictors of PDUS responder at 6 months.

Conclusion: The clinical characteristic of patients at baseline involves in US disease activity at 6 months treated by b/tsDMARDs. Physicians are recommended to pay attention to this information to consider the efficacy of DMARDs therapies.


Disclosure: A. Nishino, None; S. Y. Kawashiri, None; A. Kawakami, None; T. Yoshitama, None; N. Eiraku, None; N. Matsuoka, None; Y. Ueki, None; A. Okada, None; H. Hamada, None; T. Hidaka, None; S. Nagano, None; T. Tsuru, None; K. Fujikawa, None; Y. Arinobu, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nishino A, Kawashiri SY, Kawakami A, Yoshitama T, Eiraku N, Matsuoka N, Ueki Y, Okada A, Hamada H, Hidaka T, Nagano S, Tsuru T, Fujikawa K, Arinobu Y. Ultrasound Evaluation of the Efficacy of Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Dmards Toward Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Kyushu Multicenter Rheumatoid Arthritis Ultrasound Prospective Observational Cohort in Japan [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ultrasound-evaluation-of-the-efficacy-of-biologic-and-targeted-synthetic-dmards-toward-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-kyushu-multicenter-rheumatoid-arthritis-ultrasound-prospective-observational-cohor/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ultrasound-evaluation-of-the-efficacy-of-biologic-and-targeted-synthetic-dmards-toward-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-kyushu-multicenter-rheumatoid-arthritis-ultrasound-prospective-observational-cohor/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology