ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 162

Ultrasonography Versus Clinical Examination in Early DMARD-Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis – a Comparative Study of Synovitis on the Individual Joint Level

Lena B. Nordberg1, Elisabeth Lie1, Siri Lillegraven1, Anna-Birgitte Aga1, Inge C Olsen2, Hilde Berner Hammer3, Till Uhlig4, Désirée van der Heijde5, Tore K. Kvien1, Espen A. Haavardsholm1 and the ARCTIC Study Group, 1Dept. of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 2Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 3Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 4Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 5Dept. of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Imaging, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ultrasonography and ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster I: Ultrasound, Optical Imaging and Capillaroscopy

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Ultrasonography (US) is increasingly
accepted as an important tool in diagnosis and management of rheumatoid
arthritis (RA).  However, it is not
well known to what extent US adds information to
clinical examination at the individual joint level. Our objective was to assess
concordance between clinical joint examination and US in detecting synovitis at
the individual joint level in a cohort of early RA patients.

Methods: 228 patients with early RA who fulfilled the
2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria were recruited at 11 Rheumatology centers between 2010 and 2013. Patients were required to
have symptom duration <2 years (from onset of joint swelling) and to be DMARD
na•ve with indication for DMARD treatment. 44 joints were assessed for swelling
by a rheumatologist or trained research nurse. US examinations were performed
by experienced and well-calibrated sonographers,
using a validated gray-scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) semi-quantitative
scoring system with scores 0-3 for GS and PD in each of the following 36
joints: MCP 2-5, radio-carpal (RCJ), distal radio-ulnar (DRUJ), inter-carpal
(ICJ), PIP 2-3, elbow, knee, talo-crural and MTP 1-5
bilaterally. We defined US synovitis (US+) as GS ³2 and/or PD ³1.  For the wrist the US comparison
with clinical joint swelling included one or
several of the
RCJ, DRUJ and ICJ. Joints were assessed bilaterally
and analysed on an aggregated level. Kappa values between clinical joint
swelling and US synovitis were calculated for all joints. We specifically
assessed the proportion of joints with US synovitis that were not clinically
swollen, and vice versa.

Results: The mean age (SD) of the 228 patients was 51.1
(13.8) years, mean (SD) disease duration 7.1 (5.4)
months and 62.3% were female. Mean (SD) DAS was 3.47 (1.13) the median (25, 75
percentiles) number of swollen joints was 9 (4, 14), and
the median (25, 75 percentiles) number of
joints with
US synovitis
was 7 (
3,11). A total of 8208 joints were examined
by US. Agreement between US and clinical examination was best in the elbow,
wrist and knee (kappa 0.68, 0.53, 0.51, respectively). The proportion of joints
with US synovitis that were not clinically swollen ranged from 16% (PIP2) to
76% (MTP1). The six joints with the largest and smallest discrepancies are
presented in the table. Similarly, a significant proportion of clinically
swollen joints had no US synovitis, ranging from 23% (wrist and elbow) to 70%
(ankle).

Table: Comparison of US synovitis and clinical joint swelling in selected joints*

Joint

Swollen

Not Swollen

Kappa

Proportion of joints with US synovitis and no clinical swelling

Proportion of swollen joints without US synovitis

MTP1

US+   

35

112

0.18

76%

43%

US-

26

282

MTP5

US+   

30

66

0.30

69%

43%

US-

23

337

MCP4

US+   

28

53

0.33

65%

46%

US-

24

351

Wrist

US+  

139

62

0.53

31%

23%

US-

42

213

PIP3

US+   

90

21

0.42

19%

53%

US-

100

245

PIP2

US+   

100

19

0.45

16%

50%

US-

100

237

*Joints are sorted by the proportion of joints with US synovitis and no clinical swelling.

Conclusion: In this study of patients with early RA we
found the level of agreement between US and clinical examination to be somewhat
higher in medium to large joints compared to small joints. However, substantial
discrepancies between clinical joint swelling and US pathology were found for
most joints, and these findings support that US provides additional information
compared to clinical examination in most joint areas.


Disclosure: L. B. Nordberg, None; E. Lie, None; S. Lillegraven, None; A. B. Aga, None; I. C. Olsen, None; H. B. Hammer, None; T. Uhlig, None; D. van der Heijde, None; T. K. Kvien, None; E. A. Haavardsholm, AbbVie, 2,Pfizer Inc, 2,MSD, 2,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 2,UCB, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nordberg LB, Lie E, Lillegraven S, Aga AB, Olsen IC, Hammer HB, Uhlig T, van der Heijde D, Kvien TK, Haavardsholm EA. Ultrasonography Versus Clinical Examination in Early DMARD-Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis – a Comparative Study of Synovitis on the Individual Joint Level [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ultrasonography-versus-clinical-examination-in-early-dmard-naive-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-comparative-study-of-synovitis-on-the-individual-joint-level/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ultrasonography-versus-clinical-examination-in-early-dmard-naive-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-comparative-study-of-synovitis-on-the-individual-joint-level/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology