ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2045

Treatment Patterns and Monitoring of Serum Uric Acid Levels in a Large Cohort of Gout Patients in the United States: Is There Room for Improvement?

Yong Chen1, Kasem S. Akhras2, Michael Grabner1, Rima H. Tawk3 and Ralph Quimbo1, 1HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, 2Global Outcomes Research, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., Deerfield, IL, 3Center for pharmacoeconomic Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Febuxostat, gout, quality of care and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Quality Measures and Innovations in Practice Management and Care Delivery

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Currently, there are no guidelines in the United States on monitoring serum uric acid (sUA) levels in gout and gout treatment patterns. However, there are guidelines from the European League Against Rheumatism gout task force and the British Society for Rheumatology/British Health Professionals in Rheumatology. Our aim was to assess treatment patterns for gout and laboratory sUA monitoring in a managed care population in the U.S., relative to international guidelines.

Methods: Data were extracted from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRDSM), which contains integrated medical and pharmacy claims and laboratory result data from a large commercial U.S. health insurer. Eligible patients had either ≥2 medical claims for gout (ICD-9-CM code = 274) or ≥1 pharmacy claim for gout medications (allopurinol, colchicine, febuxostat, probenecid, sulphinpyrazone) between 01/01/2008 and 05/31/2011. The date of the earliest relevant claim was set as the index date. We included patients ≥18 years of age on index date, with ≥12 months of continuous eligibility pre-index date. Key guidelines selected in this study included initiating dose of allopurinol, mean time to dose escalation, maximum dosing levels, and sUA lab testing. We focused on a subgroup of patients initiating urate-lowering therapies (ULTs) after a new gout diagnosis (no pre-existing gout at baseline). Additionally, for a subset of patients with available electronic laboratory data, sUA levels were assessed within a year prior to and after initiation of ULTs. Treatment patterns were assessed until end of eligibility or end of the study period using descriptive statistics.

Results: We identified 93,546 eligible patients; 26% (n=24,555) were female and 35% (n=32,729) initiated ULTs. Mean (± SD) age was 58±14.83 years and Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 1.35± 2.02. Allopurinol accounted for 96% (n=31,388) of all first-line ULT fills, followed by probenecid (n=1,032) and febuxostat (n=309). No patients initiated sulphinpyrazone. Compared to guidelines, the mean starting dose of allopurinol was higher (213±114.48 mg/day vs. 100mg) and mean time to dose escalation was longer (24±28.6 weeks vs. 2-4 weeks); however, maximum daily dosing levels (244±117.12 mg/day) were within the recommended range. While 61% (n=19,843) of patients who initiated ULT had ≥1 sUA test prior to ULT initiation, only 34% (n=11,256) had ≥1 sUA test pre- and post-ULT initiation. Among 10,926 patients with sUA levels above target range (sUA >6 mg/dL) prior to ULT initiation, only 11% (n=1,190) achieved the goal of sUA ≤6mg/dL within a year of ULT initiation.

Conclusion: Comparing the results of this study to international guidelines shows room for improvement, specifically in laboratory monitoring of sUA levels relative to gout treatment. The results may be due in part to lack of U.S. guidelines regarding the appropriate frequency of sUA testing relative to starting ULT, dose adjustment, and achievement of target sUA levels.


Disclosure:

Y. Chen,
None;

K. S. Akhras,

Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. ,

3;

M. Grabner,
None;

R. H. Tawk,

UIC/Takeda Fellow,

3;

R. Quimbo,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-patterns-and-monitoring-of-serum-uric-acid-levels-in-a-large-cohort-of-gout-patients-in-the-united-states-is-there-room-for-improvement/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology