ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • Search
  • My Favorites
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all favorites

Abstract Number: 2045

Treatment Patterns and Monitoring of Serum Uric Acid Levels in a Large Cohort of Gout Patients in the United States: Is There Room for Improvement?

Yong Chen1, Kasem S. Akhras2, Michael Grabner1, Rima H. Tawk3 and Ralph Quimbo1, 1HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, 2Global Outcomes Research, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., Deerfield, IL, 3Center for pharmacoeconomic Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2012

Keywords: Febuxostat, gout, quality of care and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Quality Measures and Innovations in Practice Management and Care Delivery

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Currently, there are no guidelines in the United States on monitoring serum uric acid (sUA) levels in gout and gout treatment patterns. However, there are guidelines from the European League Against Rheumatism gout task force and the British Society for Rheumatology/British Health Professionals in Rheumatology. Our aim was to assess treatment patterns for gout and laboratory sUA monitoring in a managed care population in the U.S., relative to international guidelines.

Methods: Data were extracted from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRDSM), which contains integrated medical and pharmacy claims and laboratory result data from a large commercial U.S. health insurer. Eligible patients had either ≥2 medical claims for gout (ICD-9-CM code = 274) or ≥1 pharmacy claim for gout medications (allopurinol, colchicine, febuxostat, probenecid, sulphinpyrazone) between 01/01/2008 and 05/31/2011. The date of the earliest relevant claim was set as the index date. We included patients ≥18 years of age on index date, with ≥12 months of continuous eligibility pre-index date. Key guidelines selected in this study included initiating dose of allopurinol, mean time to dose escalation, maximum dosing levels, and sUA lab testing. We focused on a subgroup of patients initiating urate-lowering therapies (ULTs) after a new gout diagnosis (no pre-existing gout at baseline). Additionally, for a subset of patients with available electronic laboratory data, sUA levels were assessed within a year prior to and after initiation of ULTs. Treatment patterns were assessed until end of eligibility or end of the study period using descriptive statistics.

Results: We identified 93,546 eligible patients; 26% (n=24,555) were female and 35% (n=32,729) initiated ULTs. Mean (± SD) age was 58±14.83 years and Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 1.35± 2.02. Allopurinol accounted for 96% (n=31,388) of all first-line ULT fills, followed by probenecid (n=1,032) and febuxostat (n=309). No patients initiated sulphinpyrazone. Compared to guidelines, the mean starting dose of allopurinol was higher (213±114.48 mg/day vs. 100mg) and mean time to dose escalation was longer (24±28.6 weeks vs. 2-4 weeks); however, maximum daily dosing levels (244±117.12 mg/day) were within the recommended range. While 61% (n=19,843) of patients who initiated ULT had ≥1 sUA test prior to ULT initiation, only 34% (n=11,256) had ≥1 sUA test pre- and post-ULT initiation. Among 10,926 patients with sUA levels above target range (sUA >6 mg/dL) prior to ULT initiation, only 11% (n=1,190) achieved the goal of sUA ≤6mg/dL within a year of ULT initiation.

Conclusion: Comparing the results of this study to international guidelines shows room for improvement, specifically in laboratory monitoring of sUA levels relative to gout treatment. The results may be due in part to lack of U.S. guidelines regarding the appropriate frequency of sUA testing relative to starting ULT, dose adjustment, and achievement of target sUA levels.


Disclosure:

Y. Chen,
None;

K. S. Akhras,

Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. ,

3;

M. Grabner,
None;

R. H. Tawk,

UIC/Takeda Fellow,

3;

R. Quimbo,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2012

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-patterns-and-monitoring-of-serum-uric-acid-levels-in-a-large-cohort-of-gout-patients-in-the-united-states-is-there-room-for-improvement/

Advanced Search

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology