ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1816

Treatment of Non-biologic-DMARD-IR PsA Patients with Upadacitinib or Adalimumab Results in the Modulation of Distinct Functional Pathways: Proteomics Analysis of a Phase 3 Study

Thierry Sornasse1, Jaclyn Anderson2, Koji Kato3, Apinya Lertratanakul4, Christopher Ritchlin5 and Iain McInnes6, 1AbbVie Inc, Redwood City, CA, 2AbbVie Inc, Gurnee, IL, 3AbbVie Inc, Shinagawa- Ku, Japan, 4AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 5Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 6University of Glasgow, School of Medicine, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Biomarkers, clinical trial, proteomics, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Treatment Poster III: Psoriatic Arthritis II (1801–1835)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Treatment of non-biologic-DMARD-IR (DMARD-IR) PsA patients with upadacitinib (UPA) at 15 mg QD, an oral JAK1 selective inhibitor, resulted in improvement in musculoskeletal symptoms, psoriasis, physical function, fatigue, quality of life, and inhibited radiographic progression; improvements were observed as early as Week 2 (ACR20 and ACR50). UPA 15 mg QD was non-inferior to ADA 40 mg EOW for ACR20.1 The objective of this analysis was to determine the relative biological pathway modulation of UPA compared with ADA in patients with PsA via the evaluation of a pre-defined set of plasma proteins associated with inflammation.

Methods: Patients from the SELECT-PsA 1 study (DMARD-IR PsA patients) were randomly selected (PBO, n=100; UPA 15 mg QD, n=100; ADA 40 mg EOW, N = 100). The levels of 92 inflammation related protein biomarkers (pBM) were analyzed using the Olink® platform in plasma samples collected at baseline, week 2, and 12; change from baseline in protein levels were expressed as Log2 Fold Change; a Repeated Measure Mixed Linear Model identified proteins modulated by UPA and ADA compared to Baseline. Functional pathway prediction was performed with Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis (Qiagen Inc.) where 52 significantly modulated pBM (mean |Log2 FC| ≥ 0.1 AND FDR ≤ 0.05) were selected; results were summarized based on 3 core biological groups: 1) adaptive immune system, 2) innate immune system, and 3) non-immune connective and vascular systems.

Results: At the single pBM-level, at the week 2 and 12 time points, treatment with UPA 15 mg QD resulted in distinct down modulation of T cell-associated (CD5, CD8a, IL15Ra, SLAMF1, TRANCE) and myeloid cell-associated pBM (CSF-1, CCL7, CCL13) that was not observed in the ADA treated group. Reciprocally, treatment with ADA 40 mg EOW resulted in a specific down modulation of a subset of neutrophil associated pBM (CCL3, CCL4, and S100A12). Both treatments resulted in the down modulation of IFN-, IL6-, and TNF-related pBM (CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, IL6, TNFRSF19, and TNSF14 ) suggesting a common node of activity related to these pivotal cytokine-signaling pathways.

Functional pathway prediction based on the pBM data revealed that treatment with UPA is preferentially associated with the inhibition of T cells, but also NK cells and lymphocytes, compared to the predicted effects of treatment with ADA. Treatment with UPA also preferentially inhibited pathways related to bone damage and angiogenesis, as compared to the predicted effect of treatment with ADA. Finally, both treatments were predicted to inhibit multiple pathways associated with the activity of myeloid cells and phagocytes.

Conclusion: Consistent with previous observations in RA2, UPA is predicted to inhibit multiple functional pathways associated the pathobiology of PsA belonging to the general categories of adaptive and innate immunity but also non-immune vascular and connective tissue biology. In contrast, treatment with ADA appears to affect more specifically functional pathways associated with the innate immune system.

References:

1. McInnes, I. et al. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 79, 16-17 (2020).

2. Sornasse, T., Song, I.H., Radstake, T. & McInnes, I. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 79, 581-582 (2020).


Disclosures: T. Sornasse, AbbVie, 3, 11; J. Anderson, AbbVie, 3, 11; K. Kato, AbbVie, 3, 11; A. Lertratanakul, AbbVie, 3, 11; C. Ritchlin, UCB, 2, 5, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, Pfizer, 2, Novartis, 2, Gilead, 2, Janssen, 2; I. McInnes, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, AbbVie, 2, AstraZeneca, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sornasse T, Anderson J, Kato K, Lertratanakul A, Ritchlin C, McInnes I. Treatment of Non-biologic-DMARD-IR PsA Patients with Upadacitinib or Adalimumab Results in the Modulation of Distinct Functional Pathways: Proteomics Analysis of a Phase 3 Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-of-non-biologic-dmard-ir-psa-patients-with-upadacitinib-or-adalimumab-results-in-the-modulation-of-distinct-functional-pathways-proteomics-analysis-of-a-phase-3-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-of-non-biologic-dmard-ir-psa-patients-with-upadacitinib-or-adalimumab-results-in-the-modulation-of-distinct-functional-pathways-proteomics-analysis-of-a-phase-3-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology