ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0154

Treatment Decision Making Among Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients: Real-World Data from the ArthritisPower Registry

William Nowell1, Theresa Hunter2, Kelly Gavigan3, Jeffrey R Curtis4, William Malatestinic5, Rebecca Bolce5, Jeffrey Lisse5, Andris Kronbergs5, Carol Himelein5, Jennifer Walker6 and Jessica Walsh7, 1Global Healthy Living Foundation, New York City, NY, 2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, 3Global Healthy Living Foundation, Upper Nyack, NY, 4Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 5Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 6Global Health Living Foundation, New York City, NY, 7University of Utah School of Medicine, George E. Wahlen Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Patient reported outcomes

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster I: RA, Spondyloarthritis, & OA

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapy has been shown to be effective in the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).1,2 Little is understood about axSpA patients’ treatment journey from their own perspective. The purpose of this study was to explore treatment decision-making of axSpA patients and to identify barriers and facilitators to treatment optimization.

Methods: This was an observational, cross-sectional study of participants (pts) in the ArthritisPower registry using a survey developed in partnership with patients and clinicians. Pts aged ≥ 19 years with physician-diagnosed axSpA and access to a computer/smartphone were invited to complete electronic patient-reported outcome measures and an online survey on treatment (tx) decision making. Pts’ responses were classified into 2 groups based on whether or not currently on a bDMARD.

Results: 274 pts met inclusion criteria of whom 87.2% were female, 85.4% White, with mean age of 50 years (Table 1). The majority of pts (82.1%) had been diagnosed with axSpA by a rheumatologist. Of all pts, 56.9% (n=156) discussed a tx change at their most recent physician visit, 79.5% of whom researched the treatment change on their own, and 46.2% (n=72) of these pts reported having raised the issue with their clinician themselves. Half (51.3%) of tx changes discussed were related to initiation of a new medication, compared with stopping a medication (24.4%) and/or changing its dose (35.9%). The majority of pts (85.3%; n=133) who discussed a change agreed to the tx change and most pts agreeing to a change did so because they felt their disease was not being controlled (54.9%; n=73) or because they thought control could be better on new tx (n=27; 20.3%). Most pts (62.8%) reported agreeing to the suggested tx change by end of clinic visit, while 15.4% needed ≤ 1 week to decide. Pts on a bDMARD were more likely to discuss switching medications (52.0%) or increasing dose (42.9%) vs. non-bDMARD pts (26.6%, p=0.0012; 16.5%, p=0.0003) (Table 2). Among the pts (n=23) who declined a tx change, top reasons were pts not believing there were more efficacious options than their current tx (60.9%) and worries about potential side effects of a new tx (56.5%). For bDMARD pts whose tx change was not discussed at the last visit, pts felt it was because either they or their provider were happy with the current tx (Table 2); bDMARD-treated pts and their clinicians were more likely to report satisfaction with current tx as the reason a tx change was not discussed compared to non-bDMARD pts. Overall, factors that pts on bDMARDs (n=128) considered most important when making tx decisions were preventing other long-term consequences of untreated axSpA (92.2%), preventing damage from axSpA (89.1%), and advice from their doctor (87.5%) (Table 3).

Conclusion: Most axSpA patients reported discussing tx changes with their provider at their most recent visit and had done their own research about it beforehand. Prevention of long-term damage and doctor’s advice are major factors influencing patient decisions about tx.

References:

[1] Dubash S, et al. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2018;9(3):77–87.

[2] Van Der Heijde D, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):978–91.


Disclosure: W. Nowell, None; T. Hunter, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; K. Gavigan, None; J. Curtis, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Corrona, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, Myriad, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Regeneron, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, Sanofi, 5; W. Malatestinic, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 2; R. Bolce, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; J. Lisse, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; A. Kronbergs, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; C. Himelein, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; J. Walker, None; J. Walsh, Pfizer, 2, AbbVie, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, UCB, 5, Janssen, 5, Novartis, 5, Amgen, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nowell W, Hunter T, Gavigan K, Curtis J, Malatestinic W, Bolce R, Lisse J, Kronbergs A, Himelein C, Walker J, Walsh J. Treatment Decision Making Among Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients: Real-World Data from the ArthritisPower Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-decision-making-among-axial-spondyloarthritis-patients-real-world-data-from-the-arthritispower-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-decision-making-among-axial-spondyloarthritis-patients-real-world-data-from-the-arthritispower-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology