ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3212

Treat-to-Target in RA: Does Early Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Remission Lead to Better 5-Year Functional Outcomes Than SDAI Low Disease Activity?

Vibeke Norvang, Elisabeth Lie, Inge C Olsen, Eirik K Kristianslund, Tore K Kvien and Till Uhlig, Dept. of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: longitudinal studies, physical function, remission, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects VII: The Impact of Treating to Target

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: The management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved considerably during the last couple of decades, with current recommended practice being a treat-to-target approach, involving early intervention and tight monitoring of treatment effect. When starting a new therapy, the recommended target is remission (REM) or alternatively low disease activity (LDA). Limited data exist on the impacts of reaching REM rather than LDA on long-term outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare RA-patients who achieved Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) REM versus LDA 6 months after initiating disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy, with regard to physical function, Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and disease activity during 5-year follow-up in a real-life clinical setting.  

Methods: Data were provided by the Norwegian DMARD study (NOR-DMARD), a multicentre longitudinal observational study. We selected DMARD-naive patients with RA who were consecutively enrolled from December 2000 to April 2009 (n=1617), starting treatment with methotrexate (n=1197), other conventional synthetic DMARDs (n=380) or a biological DMARD (n=33). Data on each patient were collected at baseline, after 3, 6 and 12 months, and yearly thereafter, including the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ), the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) with Physical and Mental Components Summary scores (PCS and MCS, respectively) and assessments that allowed the calculation of the composite disease activity scores SDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and the Disease Activity Score based on 28 joint counts with ESR (DAS28). Multivariate linear mixed models were used to explore the effect of SDAI status at 6 months on physical function (MHAQ), HRQoL (SF-36 PCS and MCS) and disease activity (SDAI, CDAI, DAS28) during 1-5 year follow-up. The statistical models were adjusted for potential baseline confounders such as age, sex, disease duration and disease activity.  

Results: Of the 1617 eligible patients at baseline, 1301 (80.5%) had a registered visit at 6 months. 602 patients were in either SDAI REM (n=143, 11.0%) or LDA (n=459, 35.3%) at 6 months and were included in the main analyses. The achievement of SDAI REM rather than SDAI LDA at 6 months was associated with significantly better physical function (MHAQ) and HRQoL (SF-36 PCS) and with lower disease activity (SDAI, CDAI, DAS28) at all yearly follow-up visits between 1 and 5 years (table).  

Conclusion: The achievement of SDAI REM rather than LDA 6 months after initiating DMARD-therapy, lead to better long term functional outcomes during 5-year follow-up in a real-life clinical setting. The results support the use of a stringent treatment target, such as SDAI REM, when initiating DMARD-therapy in RA-patients.              


Disclosure: V. Norvang, None; E. Lie, None; I. C. Olsen, None; E. K. Kristianslund, None; T. K. Kvien, Biogen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Epirus, Hospira, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Orion Pharma, Prizer, Sandoz, UCB, 5; T. Uhlig, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Norvang V, Lie E, Olsen IC, Kristianslund EK, Kvien TK, Uhlig T. Treat-to-Target in RA: Does Early Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Remission Lead to Better 5-Year Functional Outcomes Than SDAI Low Disease Activity? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treat-to-target-in-ra-does-early-simplified-disease-activity-index-sdai-remission-lead-to-better-5-year-functional-outcomes-than-sdai-low-disease-activity/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treat-to-target-in-ra-does-early-simplified-disease-activity-index-sdai-remission-lead-to-better-5-year-functional-outcomes-than-sdai-low-disease-activity/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology