ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0754

Towards a Guide for Evidence-based Remote Monitoring: Sensitivity of Patient Reported Outcomes to Change in Disease Activity Status in Early and Established Rheumatoid Arthritis

Agnes Loiojen1, Elise van Mulligen2, Annette van der Helm-van Mil3 and Pascal de Jong2, 1Erasmus Medical Center, department of rheumatology, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Disease Activity, Patient reported outcomes, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: Abstracts: Measures & Measurement of Healthcare Quality

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:00PM-3:30PM

Background/Purpose: In the treatment and follow-up of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, it has become more desirable to detect changes in disease activity through remote monitoring. Patient reported outcomes(PROs) might be useful for this purpose. So far associations between PROs and changes in disease activity have been mostly investigated on a continuous scale. However, in daily practice, and in line with the current recommendations, treatment decisions are mainly based on the patient’s disease activity status. Earlier literature has shown that functionality, morning stiffness, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), general health (GH), joint pain and fatigue change with the development and resolution of a disease flare.

Therefore, our aim is to determine if PROs that cover functionality, joint pain, morning stiffness, HRQoL, GH and fatigue are sensitive to disease activity status alterations in patients with early and established RA.

Methods: Early RA patients from the tREACH trial and established RA patients from the TARA trial were included. Both studies are multicentre, single-blinded trials with a treat-to-target approach. Treatment alterations were based on the disease activity score (DAS44) and PROs were collected at 3-montly intervals. The following PROs were studied: (1) the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index(HAQ-DI), (2) morning stiffness severity (numeric rating scale, NRS 0-10), (3) the 3-level EQ-5D(EQ-5D-3L) (4) GH (visual analogue scale, VAS 0-100mm), (5) joint pain (NRS 0-10) and (6) fatigue (VAS 0-100mm).

Disease activity status were defined as: (1) active disease (DAS≥2.4), (2) low disease activity (LDA, DAS< 2.4 and ≥1.6), and (3) remission (DAS< 1.6). Differences in disease activity status between two consecutive visits were compared to changes in PROs. Mean changes in PROs per disease activity status alteration were compared to stable disease activity status using linear mixed models.

Results: A total of 587 early and 189 established RA patients were included. The median symptom duration (interquartile range, IQR) was 0.4 (0.2-0.6) and 6.2 (4.1-8.9) years respectively. The mean DAS (95% confidence interval, CI) at baseline was 3.0 (3.0-3.2) in the early and 1.0 (0.9-1.1) in the established RA group.

Figure 1 shows the mean change in PROs per change in disease activity status(with 95%CI and significance). Changes in HAQ-DI, morning stiffness severity, EQ-5D-3L, GH, joint pain and fatigue (in early RA) were in concordance with improvement or worsening of the disease activity status. Changes from remission or LDA to active disease and vice versa had a bigger impact on the change in PRO compared to changes between LDA and remission.

Conclusion: HAQ-DI, morning stiffness, EQ-5D-3L, GH and joint pain are sensitive to changes in disease activity status. These results suggest that aforementioned PROs may be helpful in remote monitoring of RA.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1A-F show the mean change (95%CI) in PRO after disease activity status alteration for early and established RA patients. * indicates that change in PRO is significantly (p<0.05) different compared to stable disease activity status.
Abbreviations: AD, active disease; EQ-5D_3L, 3-level EQ-5D; HAQ-DI, health assessment questionnaire-disability index; LDA, low disease activity; NRS, numeric rating scale; R, remission; VAS, visual analogue scale.


Disclosures: A. Loiojen: None; E. van Mulligen: None; A. van der Helm-van Mil: None; P. de Jong: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Loiojen A, van Mulligen E, van der Helm-van Mil A, de Jong P. Towards a Guide for Evidence-based Remote Monitoring: Sensitivity of Patient Reported Outcomes to Change in Disease Activity Status in Early and Established Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/towards-a-guide-for-evidence-based-remote-monitoring-sensitivity-of-patient-reported-outcomes-to-change-in-disease-activity-status-in-early-and-established-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/towards-a-guide-for-evidence-based-remote-monitoring-sensitivity-of-patient-reported-outcomes-to-change-in-disease-activity-status-in-early-and-established-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology