ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 80

Tidemark Duplication In Osteoarthritis: Evidence Of Incremental Progression?

Martine P. Roudier1, Paul A. Manner2 and Peter A. Simkin3, 1Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2Orthopaedics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 3Div of Rheumatology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: cartilage, histopathologic and osteoarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Biology and Pathology of Bone and Joint (Cartilage and Osteoarthritis)

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

·         Background/Purpose: Osteoarthritis (OA) is commonly envisioned as a gradual, relentlessly progressive process of “wear and tear” leading to eventual joint failure.  As we see the tidemark (TM) between hyaline and calcified cartilage, we read a different message. 

·         Methods:  We studied the femoral condyles and tibial plateaux of 18 elderly body donors for evidence of tidemark duplication. We used 62 specimens representing at least 2 specimens per donor. Specimens were photographed, sampled, radiographed, decalcified using 10% formic acid, processed and embedded in paraffin, sectioned then stained with H&E, Safranine O and Mallory Aniline Blue. They were graded using the OARSI 2005 6 point-grading system (G0-G6). When two lesions existed in the same specimen, each lesion was individually graded. A TM number was recorded for each graded lesion. A Spearman correlation between the lesion grade and the number of tidemarks was determined using Graphpad Prizm software.

·         Results: TM number correlated significantly with OA histological grade (r=0.81, p<0.0001). Thirty three of the 62 specimens had 2 lesions generating 95 grades. Twelve grades were without visible TM (1 G5, 7 G6 and 4 technical issues) and were excluded from the study. Of the 83 remaining grades, 17 were G0 and had 1 TM, 27 were G1 and had 1 or 2 TMs, 22 were G2 and had 2 or 3 TMs, 9 were G3 and had 1, 2 or 3 TMs, and 8 were G4 and had 3 or 5 TMs.

Roudier Picture.jpg

·         Conclusion: The number of TMs correlated highly with the OARSI histological grade, suggesting that the TM number is a reflection of the OA disease stage. Since the TMs were distinct, we believe that duplication represents the legacy of abrupt, sequential changes leading to regional calcification of deep hyaline cartilage. The calcification buries the previous tidemark and causes the tidemark formation process to begin anew at a higher level.  The most probable precipitating event would be a change in joint loading such as that resulting from a focal microfracture of subchondral bone.


Disclosure:

M. P. Roudier,
None;

P. A. Manner,
None;

P. A. Simkin,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tidemark-duplication-in-osteoarthritis-evidence-of-incremental-progression/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology