ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 832

The Validity and Reliability of Online Obituaries As a Source of Mortality Data

Medha Soowamber1, John T. Granton2, Fatemeh Bavaghar-Zaeimi3 and Sindhu R. Johnson4,5, 1Rheumatology, University of Toronto/ Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Medicine, Univeristiy Health Network Pulmonary Hypertension Programme, Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Rheumatology, Toronto Scleroderma Program, Toronto Western Hospital and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Toronto Scleroderma Program, Division of Rheumatology, Toronto Western Hospital, Mount Sinai Hospital, Institue of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation,, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Arthritis, fibrosis, Rheumatic disease, scleroderma and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes and Raynaud's - Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Loss to follow-up is a major threat to the conduct of chronic disease cohort research. Tracking the survival status of patients who are lost to follow-up is limited by restricted access to death certificate data and patients moving. One strategy to gather mortality data is to use online obituaries. Although commonly used clinically, it is uncertain if this is appropriate for research. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of online obituaries as a source of mortality data in 2 chronic diseases, systemic sclerosis (SSc) and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH).

Methods: Patients whose survival status was known were randomly selected from the Toronto Scleroderma Program and the University Health Network Pulmonary Hypertension Program. Five commonly used online obituaries were evaluated. Two investigators, blinded to survival status, independently entered the first and last name of each patient in each website. If the patient was identified as deceased, other matching variables (date of birth, postal code, disease) were used to verify the patient. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was used to evaluate the correlation between the website finding and actual survival status. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was evaluated using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). 

Results: We studied 365 patients (273 females, 92 males) including 219 SSc (171 females, 48 males) and 146 IPAH (102 females, 44 males) patients. There was a significant positive correlation between website 1 and the actual survival status (r = 0.36 (95%CI 0.27, 0.45, p<0.001)) and was similar across diseases, SSc (r=0.34 (95%CI 0.21, 0.45, p<0.001) and IPAH (r=0.41 (95% CI 0.26, 0.53, p<0.001). The ICC for the intra-rater reliability of websites 1 and 3 were 0.95 (95%CI 0.93, 0.96) and 0.96 (95%CI 0.95, 0.97) respectively, which were higher compared website 2, 4, 5 (0.77 (95%CI 0.72, 0.80), 0.75 (95%CI 0.71, 0.80) and 0.21 (95%CI 0.11, 0.31) respectively). The ICC for inter-rater reliability was strong (0.82 (95%CI 0.78, 0.85).

Conclusion: Use of selected online obituaries is a valid and reliable method to gather mortality data.  They could be used in clinical research to track patients who are lost to follow up.


Disclosure: M. Soowamber, None; J. T. Granton, Actelion, Bayer and GSK, 5,Bayer, Actelion, Pfizer, 9,Actelion and Bayer, 9,Actelion, 9,IKARIA, 9; F. Bavaghar-Zaeimi, None; S. R. Johnson, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Soowamber M, Granton JT, Bavaghar-Zaeimi F, Johnson SR. The Validity and Reliability of Online Obituaries As a Source of Mortality Data [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-validity-and-reliability-of-online-obituaries-as-a-source-of-mortality-data/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-validity-and-reliability-of-online-obituaries-as-a-source-of-mortality-data/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology