ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0809

The Utility of the sFlt1:PlGF Ratio to Rule out and Predict Preeclampsia in Women with Lupus

Megan Clowse1, Kateena Addae-Konadu2, Jerome Federspiel3, Jennifer Gilner2, Andra James2, Eugene Kovalik2, Anika Lucas3, Laura Neil2, Catherine Sims4, Amanda Snyderman2, Samir Soneji2 and Amanda Eudy5, 1Duke University, Chapel Hill, NC, 2Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, 3Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 4Duke University, Knightdale, NC, 5Duke University, Raleigh, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Angiogenesis, Biomarkers, pregnancy, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Women's health

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: Abstracts: Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 1:00PM-2:30PM

Background/Purpose: Women with SLE have high rates of preeclampsia caused by poor placental vascularization. The FDA recently approved the ratio of two angiogenic factors, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (s-Flt1) and placental growth factor (PlGF), as a diagnostic test for preeclampsia. In women without rheumatic disease, over 90% have an sFlt1:PlGF ratio ≤ 38. An sFlt1:PlGF ratio this low rules out preeclampsia, while an sFlt1:PlGF ratio > 85 is predictive of preeclampsia. We sought to determine whether these thresholds could rule-out or rule-in preeclampsia in women with SLE.

Methods: Pregnancies came from a prospective registry and met these criteria: entry ≤30 weeks gestation, serum sample ≥20 weeks gestation, and singleton. Preeclampsia, including post-partum preeclampsia, was determined by a roundtable of six experts. All laboratory measurements occurred at routine rheumatology visits. We tested if a low sFlt1:PlGF ratio (≤38) was associated with the absence of preeclampsia at 4- and 8- weeks post-draw, and during the entire pregnancy/postpartum, and if a high sFlt1:PlGF ratio ( >85) was associated with preeclampsia at the same time points. We assessed pregnancies overall, and stratified by urine protein: creatinine ratio at the time of the visit (UPCR >300 vs. ≤300 mg/g).

Results: The cohort included 107 samples from 68 women with SLE, 29% with a history of lupus nephritis and 16% with active nephritis during pregnancy (per SLEPDAI renal definitions) (Table 1). Average maternal age was 31; 50% of women self-identified as Black and 38% as White. Preeclampsia incidence was 34% and the majority of test results (62%) had an sFlt1:PlGF ratio >38.

All SLE pregnancies: Pregnancies with sFlt1:PlGF≤38 were unlikely to develop preeclampsia (Table 2). sFlt1:PlGF>85 was modestly effective in predicting preeclampsia.

Pregnancies without proteinuria: Both sFlt1:PlGF≤38 and sFlt1:PlGF≤85 very effectively ruled out preeclampsia (NPV >95% within 8 weeks). sFlt1:PlGF>38 was not predictive of preeclampsia. Of the 14 patients who developed preeclampsia without having proteinuria in the clinic visit, 12 had sFlt1:PlGF>38 (sensitivity 86%). sFlt1:PlGF>85 was not predictive of preeclampsia within 4-weeks, but a third developed preeclampsia within 8-weeks and half had preeclampsia eventually.

Pregnancies with proteinuria: sFlt1:PlGF≤38 largely ruled out preeclampsia within the next 4 weeks (NPV 80%), but two-thirds eventually had preeclampsia. sFlt1:PlGF>38 was moderately predictive of preeclampsia and sFlt1:PlGF>85 was more predictive of preeclampsia.

Conclusion:

The high frequency of an elevated sFlt1:PlGF ratio among women with SLE highlights poor placental vascularization with SLE. Having neither proteinuria nor a high sFlt1:PlGF effectively ruled out preeclampsia. Having either proteinuria or a high sFlt1:PlGF suggested preeclampsia was unlikely within the next 4 weeks, but these patients were at high risk for subsequent preeclampsia. Having both proteinuria and a high sFlt1:PlGF ratio made preeclampsia likely to occur. The cut-off of sFlt1:PlGF≤38 effectively rules out preeclampsia for women with SLE without proteinuria; for those with proteinuria, a low sFlt1:PlGF≤38 suggests preeclampsia is not imminent.

Supporting image 1

Cohort characteristics of the pregnancies studied.

Supporting image 2

Performance of the sFlt1:PlGF ratio to rule out or predict preeclampsia for women with SLE.


Disclosures: M. Clowse: AstraZeneca, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; K. Addae-Konadu: None; J. Federspiel: Hemosquid, 2; J. Gilner: None; A. James: None; E. Kovalik: None; A. Lucas: None; L. Neil: None; C. Sims: Amgen, 2; A. Snyderman: GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5; S. Soneji: None; A. Eudy: Exagen, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Immunovant, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Clowse M, Addae-Konadu K, Federspiel J, Gilner J, James A, Kovalik E, Lucas A, Neil L, Sims C, Snyderman A, Soneji S, Eudy A. The Utility of the sFlt1:PlGF Ratio to Rule out and Predict Preeclampsia in Women with Lupus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-utility-of-the-sflt1plgf-ratio-to-rule-out-and-predict-preeclampsia-in-women-with-lupus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-utility-of-the-sflt1plgf-ratio-to-rule-out-and-predict-preeclampsia-in-women-with-lupus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology