ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1103

The Role of Renal Dual-Energy CT in Exploring the Gouty Kidney: The RENODECT Study

Tristan Pascart1, Elie Dauphin1, Chio Yokose2, Charlotte Jauffret3, Hyon K. Choi4 and Jean-François Budzik5, 1Université Catholique de Lille, Lille, Nord-Pas-de-Calais, France, 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Lille Catholic University, Lille, Nord-Pas-de-Calais, France, 4Massachusetts General Hospital, Lexington, MA, 5Lille Catholic University, Lille, France

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Computed tomography (CT), Crystal-induced arthritis, gout, Renal

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common feature in gout, and can have multiple causes, some of which are gout specific, such as gout nephropathy (deposition of monosodium urate (MSU) crystal in the renal medulla), due to chronic uric acid urolithiasis, or vascular nephropathy related to debated arterial MSU plaques. Dual-energy CT (DECT) has been extensively demonstrated to identify MSU crystal deposition around joints, but its ability to detect MSU crystals in kidney and vessel walls is unclear. The objective of this study was to explore if DECT can detect MSU crystal deposits in the renal medulla and renal artery walls, and uric acid urolithiasis, in patients with gout and CKD.

Methods: Patients with gout according to the 2015 ACR/EULAR classification criteria and with stage 2-4 CKD were prospectively included in this exploratory cross-sectional study. Patients’ demographics, comorbidities, gout characteristics and treatment, current serum urate (SU) levels and estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) were recorded. Patients underwent renal, knee and feet DECT scans. Volumes of MSU crystal deposition at the knees and feet were measured. Renal DECT scans were read for >2mm MSU-coded lesions in the renal tissue, renal artery walls, and urinary tract using first ‘gout’ default settings, then with optimized settings, and finally with the ‘kidney stones’ settings. Presence of renal artery calcifications were noted. Characteristics of patients with and without lesions coded as MSU or uric acid in the renal tissue, renal artery walls and urinary tract were compared.

Results: A total of 27/31 patients underwent renal DECT scans and were included in the analysis (23/27 men, mean (SD) 73 (9) years old). Gout duration was 5 [2;7] years and current SU levels were 9.2 (3.1) mg/dL. A total of 19/27 (70.4%) patients had positive knee and feet DECT scans for MSU crystal deposition (cumulative volumes ranging from 0.11 to 475.0 cm3). Mean eGFR was 45.3 ml/min/1.73m2 (21.0), and renal artery calcifications were observed in 21/27 (77.8%) patients. None of the patients exhibited deposition of MSU crystal in the renal tissue (Figure 1). One caliceal lithiasis was observed, coded as MSU crystals in ‘gout’ default settings, disappeared with ‘gout’ optimized settings, and was coded as uric acid in the ‘kidney stone’ settings (Figure 2). Four patients had MSU-coded plaques both in default and stringent ‘gout’ settings in renal arteries, one of them also coded as uric acid in the ‘kidney stones’ settings. Arterial MSU-coded plaques were associated with younger age (66 vs 75 years), higher SU levels (11.5 (3.2) mg/dL vs 8.7 (2.9)), higher eGFR (69.1 (19.0) ml/min/1.73m2 vs 42.7 (20.8), and had similar volumes of MSU deposits in knees and feet. MSU-coded plaques were systematically associated with renal artery calcifications.

Conclusion: DECT was not able to detect evidence of gout nephropathy, even in patients with extensive MSU crystal deposition around joints. DECT can detect uric acid urolithiasis, miscoded as MSU in ‘gout’ default settings. DECT identifies MSU-coded plaques in renal arteries, unrelated to the general MSU crystal burden, most probably miscoded due to calcified plaques.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. Presence of monosodium urate (MSU)-coded plaque in the right renal artery in ‘gout’ default (A), and optimized(B) settings in a 60-year-old patient with moderate MSU deposits in knees (C) and feet (D). Absence of any renal or vascular MSU deposits (E) in a 61-year-old patient with extensive MSU crystal deposits at the knees (F) and feet (G).

Supporting image 2

Figure 2. Presence of a calyceal lithiasis coded as monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in ‘gout’ default settings (A), uncoded in ‘gout’ stringent settings (B), and coded as uric acid in ‘kidney stones’ settings (C).


Disclosures: T. Pascart: None; E. Dauphin: None; C. Yokose: None; C. Jauffret: None; H. Choi: Ani, 1, Horizon, 1, 5, LG, 1, Protalix, 1, Shanton, 12, DSMB; J. Budzik: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pascart T, Dauphin E, Yokose C, Jauffret C, Choi H, Budzik J. The Role of Renal Dual-Energy CT in Exploring the Gouty Kidney: The RENODECT Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-role-of-renal-dual-energy-ct-in-exploring-the-gouty-kidney-the-renodect-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-role-of-renal-dual-energy-ct-in-exploring-the-gouty-kidney-the-renodect-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology