ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0243

The Role of Anti-dsDNA Antibodies in Predicting Incident Lupus Nephritis in Newly Diagnosed Lupus

Pooja Kumari1, Viswanathan Ramakrishnan2, Jihad Obeid2, Diane Kamen3 and Jim Oates4, 1The university of Tennesse Health Science center, Memphis, TN, 2medical university of south carolina, south carolina, 3Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 4Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, Charleston, SC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: anti-dsDNA, biomarker, Lupus nephritis, PREDICTION, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I: Clinical Manifestations

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, it is essential to identify biomarkers that predict incident LN in a newly diagnosed SLE patient. Anti-double stranded DNA antibodies (dsDNA) serve as a standard of care disease activity marker in patients with LN. However, the evidence for a predictive role of anti-dsDNA for incident LN is limited. To fill these knowledge gaps, we performed a case-control study to look at the association of anti-dsDNA in newly diagnosed SLE for future incident LN. We determined that the presence of and high titers of anti-dsDNA in newly diagnosed SLE are a significant predictor of future incident LN. Additionally, we found that the presence as well as the titers of anti-dsDNA at the time of SLE diagnosis predict earlier onset of LN. These results provide a roadmap for the use of anti-dsDNA levels to risk stratify newly diagnosed SLE patients. This stratification could guide disease activity monitoring to diagnose LN at an earlier stage.

Methods: In a prospective, observational case-control study, patients with the diagnosis of SLE were divided into cases (SLE patients with a biopsy proven LN) and controls (without LN). A logistic regression model was utilized to identify the predictive value of the presence of and high titers of anti-dsDNA for future incident LN. A survival analysis was performed to identify the time to new development of LN in relation to the presence of and high titers of anti-dsDNA.

Results: Of 394 SLE patients included in this study, 300 had LN, and 94 did not have LN. In univariate logistic regression analysis, the presence of and high titers of anti-dsDNA were associated with a significantly higher risk for incident LN. In a multivariate logistic regression model, the risk of incident LN was 2-fold with the presence of anti-dsDNA antibodies at the time of SLE diagnosis, adjusting for age, gender and sex (OR 2.1, CI 1.2- 3.4, p 0.005). In comparison to Caucasians the African Americans had a 5-fold risk of developing LN. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, the adjusted risk for the early development of LN was 44% higher in those with anti-dsDNA. The adjusted risk was about 5-fold for other races in comparison to Caucasian race. By utilizing titers as a continuous variable in the multivariate model, the adjusted risk for early development of LN increased by 8.3% for each doubling of anti-dsDNA. In Kaplan Meier analysis, the median time(month) to development of LN among patients who had a positive anti-dsDNA with new onset SLE was much shorter than patients who did not have anti-dsDNA with new onset SLE (14.4 vs 34.4, p 0.003).Similarly, the median time to incident LN among patients with high anti-dsDNA titers (≥2 times the upper limit of normal) was significantly lower compared to those with lower anti-dsDNA titers (12.3 vs 39.0,p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Younger age, African American race, presence of anti-dsDNA and high titers of anti-dsDNA at the time of SLE diagnosis are significant predictors for the incident LN.

Younger age, Hispanic ethnicity, non-Caucasian race, and presence of anti-dsDNA antibody at the time of SLE diagnosis increased the likelihood of a more rapid progression to LN.

Baseline characteristics of SLE patients with and without lupus nephritis

Cox proportional analysis for incident LN by dsDNA titers

Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the incident lupus nephritis based on the titers of anti-dsDNA at the time of SLE diagnosis


Disclosure: P. Kumari, None; V. Ramakrishnan, None; J. Obeid, None; D. Kamen, None; J. Oates, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kumari P, Ramakrishnan V, Obeid J, Kamen D, Oates J. The Role of Anti-dsDNA Antibodies in Predicting Incident Lupus Nephritis in Newly Diagnosed Lupus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-role-of-anti-dsdna-antibodies-in-predicting-incident-lupus-nephritis-in-newly-diagnosed-lupus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-role-of-anti-dsdna-antibodies-in-predicting-incident-lupus-nephritis-in-newly-diagnosed-lupus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology