ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2593

The Prognosis Of Scleroderma Renal Crisis In RNA-Polymerase III Antibody (ARA) Positive Compared To ARA Negative Patients

Bernadette Lynch1, Henry Penn2, Jennifer Harvey3, Aine Burns4 and Christopher P. Denton5, 1Department of Rheumatology, The Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom, 2Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom, 3Clinical Immunology, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom, 4Department of Nephrology, The Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom, 5Centre for Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, UCL Medical School, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Antibodies, hypertension, renal disease and scleroderma

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud’s - Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) usually presenting with accelerated hypertension and acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most severe complications of Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). The presence of RNA-polymerase III auto-antibodies (ARA) is recognized as a strong risk factor for SRC but studies have not explored long-term outcomes in ARA positive cases compared to ARA negative cases.

Methods:

Of more than 2000 SSc patients attending our institution between 1990-2013, 150 patients had a confirmed SRC. 80% patients had diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) and 20% patients had limited cutaneous SSc (dcSSc). ARA was measured by commercial ELISA or radio-immuno-precipitation. Patients were divided into two groups: ARA positive or ARA negative. Demographic and clinical parameters were compared between groups using Student’s t-test or Chi-squared analyses where appropriate.

Results:

61/150 (41%) patients were ARA positive and significantly more likely to have dcSSc (88.3% vs 73.8%, p=0.032) than lcSSc compared to ARA negative patients. There was no significant difference in age of onset of SRC (51.2 vs 51.9 years) or the number of females (73% vs 79%) between the two groups. 50.8% of ARA positive patients required dialysis compared to 29.2% of ARA negative patients (p=0.07). The mean time to recovery of renal function was significantly longer in ARA positive patients (14.25 vs 8.27 months, p=0.032). Significantly more ARA positive patients were able to discontinue dialysis compared to ARA negative patients (53.3% vs 25.5%, p=0.01). ARA positive patients had a significantly better survival outcome (figure 1).

Conclusion:

In SRC, although more ARA positive patients required dialysis they also had significantly greater capacity for long-term recovery and survival compared to ARA negative patients.

Figure 1: Kaplan Meier survival estimate showing the effect of ARA positive auto-antibodies in patients with SRC


Disclosure:

B. Lynch,
None;

H. Penn,
None;

J. Harvey,
None;

A. Burns,
None;

C. P. Denton,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-prognosis-of-scleroderma-renal-crisis-in-rna-polymerase-iii-antibody-ara-positive-compared-to-ara-negative-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology