ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 441

The Presence of Neuropathic Pain Does Not Influence the Response to Hyaluronic Acid (HA) in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis but HA Injections Modify Pain Phenotype

Evariste Tiendrebeogo1, Thierry Conrozier2, Xavier Chevalier3 and Florent Eymard4, 1Rheumatology, APHP Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France, 2Department of Rheumatology,, Nord Franche-Comté Hospital, Belfort, France, 3Rheumatology, APHP Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France, 4Department of Rheumatology, APHP Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: hyaluronate, Knee, osteoarthritis and pain

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Twenty to forty percent of patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) described neuropathic pain (NP). Several studies have shown that hyaluronic acid (HA) is an effective treatment of pain-associated knee OA. However, the impact of NP in the response to HA in knee OA is unknown as well as the impact of HA injections on the neuropathic profile of pain.

Our main objective was to assess the effect of NP according to DN4 score (10 items; NP if DN4≥4) in the response to HA in patient with moderate to severe symptomatic knee OA. Our secondary objectives were to assess the correlations between NP and baseline clinical and radiographic characteristics of knee OA patients and the effects of HA injections on NP.

Methods:

We conducted a post-hoc analysis from the 2012 HAPPYVISC study, a multicenter randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority prospective trial comparing the efficacy of 3 weekly intra-articular injections of 2 different HA at 24 weeks. At baseline, demographic, anthropometric, clinical data (VAS Pain, WOMAC score, NP assessed by DN4, presence or lack of synovial effusion) radiologic data (OARSI score for joint space narrowing [JSN]) were recorded. The symptomatic effect of HA was assessed by PGA, WOMAC, DN4 and OMERACT-OARSI response. All patients from intention-to-treat population with fully available DN4 data were included. Mann-Whitney and chi- square tests and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used.

Results:

187 patients were included. As baseline characteristics and treatment effectiveness were similar between the 2 HA groups, their data were pooled. Mean age was 64.7, sex ratio was 0.8, mean BMI was 27.7 and mean disease duration was 46.5 months. At baseline, mean VAS pain, WOMAC pain, WOMAC function were respectively 5.8, 9.7 and 27,3. Intra-articular effusion was present in 59 patients (31.6%). 79 patients (42.2%) had a OARSI grade 3 JSN. NP was present in 20 patients (10.7%). Most common positive DN4 items were tingling (36.9) and burning (36.4%). NP was significantly associated with pain intensity according to WOMAC pain score (p = 0.02). A significant association between baseline burning and VAS pain intensity was also found (p = 0.01).

At 24 weeks, 132 patients (70.6%) were OMERACT-OARSI responders. We found a significant association between OMERACT-OARSI response and overweight, obesity, and OARSI grade (p=0,01; p=0.0003; p=0.04). The presence of NP according to DN4 score at baseline did not impact the rate of OMERACT-OARSI responders to HA (p=0.32). On the other hand, the prevalence of patients with NP decreased by 50% (n=10) at 24 weeks after HA injections and there was an improvement of more than 75% of absolute DN4 value in 64 patients (34.2%). Most improved DN4 items were itching (90%), hypoesthesia to pinprick (88%), and burning (50%).

Conclusion:

NP is frequently described by symptomatic knee OA patients and is associated with pain severity. While NP does not influence HA response, AH reduces NP especially itching, sting hypoesthesia and burning.


Disclosure: E. Tiendrebeogo, None; T. Conrozier, None; X. Chevalier, None; F. Eymard, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tiendrebeogo E, Conrozier T, Chevalier X, Eymard F. The Presence of Neuropathic Pain Does Not Influence the Response to Hyaluronic Acid (HA) in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis but HA Injections Modify Pain Phenotype [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-presence-of-neuropathic-pain-does-not-influence-the-response-to-hyaluronic-acid-ha-in-patients-with-knee-osteoarthritis-but-ha-injections-modify-pain-phenotype/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-presence-of-neuropathic-pain-does-not-influence-the-response-to-hyaluronic-acid-ha-in-patients-with-knee-osteoarthritis-but-ha-injections-modify-pain-phenotype/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology