ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
    • 2017-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • Meeting Resource Center

Abstract Number: 1761

The Link Of Foot Structure and Foot Function With Falls: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project

Yvonne M. Golightly1, Marian T. Hannan2, Howard J. Hillstrom3, Alyssa B. Dufour4, Amanda E. Nelson5, Adam Dore6 and Joanne M. Jordan7, 1Gillings School of Global Public Health, Dept of Epidemiology, Thurston Arthritis Research Center, Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina Dept of Epidemiology, Chapel Hill, NC, 2Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Dept. of Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 3Rehabilitation, Hospital Special Surgery (HSS), New York, NY, 4Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Harvard Medical School & Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 5University of North Carolina Thurston Arthritis Research Center, Chapel Hill, NC, 6Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 7Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biomechanics, Fall Risk and foot

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Session Title: ACR/ARHP Combined Epidemiology Abstract Session

Session Type: Combined Abstract Sessions

Background/Purpose:   Nearly 1/3 of older adults experience at least one fall annually in the United States.  Foot type (static and dynamic arch height) is related to how people walk, but the relationship to falls is unclear.  Prior studies have shown differences in foot type by race with a lower arch height more common in African Americans than Caucasians.  The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the association of static foot structure and dynamic foot function with falls in a community-based study of Caucasian and African American men and women 50+ years old.

Methods: Participants in the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project were queried: “In the last 12 months, have you had any falls of any type?”  If they answered “yes”, the number of falls was reported.  Tekscan Matscan foot pressure scans were used to determine foot structure (modified arch index [MAI]) during standing and foot function (center of pressure excursion index [CPEI]) while walking.  Foot structure (high arch ≤0.030, low arch ≥0.164, referent >0.030 and <0.164) and foot function variables (pronated ≤7.3, supinated ≥21.0, referent >7.3 and <21.0) were defined a priori (based on quintiles from population data), and the most extreme foot type for each participant was used in analyses. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between foot types and falls (defined two ways as ≥1 fall and ≥2 falls), adjusting for the covariates of age, body mass index [BMI], gender, and race.  Statistical interaction between foot types and each covariate was examined, and p<0.10 was considered statistically significant.

Results:   Of the 1690 participants with complete falls data, 1571 participants had foot structure data and 1490 had foot function data (mean age 68 ±9 years, mean BMI 31 ± 7 kg/m2, 67% women, 30% African American). 25% of participants reported 1+ falls in the past 12 months and 8% reported 2+ falls.  Although not statistically significant (p=0.06), the odds of 2+ falls were 40% lower among participants with high arches compared to referent (Table).  The interaction between low arches and race was p=0.05, and thus results were stratified by race.  African Americans had a lower occurrence of falls than Caucasians.  Among African Americans, those with low arches had a 75% higher odds of 1+ falls compared to referent, although these results were of borderline significance (p=0.07).  Foot function was not associated with falls (Table). 

Conclusion: These cross-sectional results indicate a possible protective relationship between high arches and falls and among African Americans a positive association between low arches and falls.  Future studies are needed to longitudinally examine the role of foot type in falls and to test the effectiveness of interventions for modifying foot type (e.g., orthotics) for fall prevention in populations.  


 


Disclosure:

Y. M. Golightly,
None;

M. T. Hannan,
None;

H. J. Hillstrom,

JAK Tool,

5;

A. B. Dufour,
None;

A. E. Nelson,
None;

A. Dore,
None;

J. M. Jordan,

Trinity Partners, Inc. ,

5,

Osteoarthritis Research Society International,

6,

Chronic Osteoarthritis Management Initiative of US Bone and Joint Initiative,

6,

Samumed,

5,

Interleukin Genetics, Inc. ,

5,

Algynomics, Inc. ,

1.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-link-of-foot-structure-and-foot-function-with-falls-the-johnston-county-osteoarthritis-project/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

© COPYRIGHT 2023 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY

Wiley

  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
  • Advanced Search
  • Meeting Resource Center
  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences