ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1427

The Importance of Outcome Measures in Ankylosing Spondylitis – Validity of the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 in a Real World Cohort

Sergio Schwartzman1, Keith Knapp2, Gary Craig3 and Discus, 1Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Arthritis Northwest PLLC., Spokane, WA, 3Discus Analytics LLC., Spokane, WA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Outcome measures, patient-reported outcome measures and spondylarthropathy

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Outcome measures in AS are well established in clinical trial settings but infrequently used in real-world (RW) practice.  These measures include the BASDAI, BASFI, and ASDAS.  The RAPID3 is an established RA measure, but infrequently used in real world (RW) settings. It has been tested most recently in 75 patients with AS correlating RAPID3 scores with BASDAI and ASDAS-ESR1. The purpose is to compare RAPID3 to BASDAI, BASFI, ASDAS-(CRP, ESR), in a cross-sectional analysis of 456 AS patients enrolled in the JointMan® registry (JM), a real-world (RW) database capturing five AS outcome measures.

Methods: A retrospective review of data collected in the JM registry. These study measures were recorded in 456 patients at 1706 visits. Indices and individual measures were compared using Spearman’s (ρ) and Cohen’s Kappa (κ) correlations.

Results: BASDAI > 4, active AS, correlated with moderate/high RAPID3; Kappa of 0.486 (p = 0.001). ASDAS >1.3, high disease activity correlated with moderate/high RAPID3; Kappa correlation of 0.544 (p = 0.001).

Patient Characteristics Value
Mean Age (SD)

52 (14.16)

Female

45.83%

White

90.57%

HLA-B27 (+)

61.90%

Conclusion: RAPID3 is the most common outcome measure utilized in RW settings for managing patients with RA.  In clinical practice this outcome is frequently obtained in all patients seen in a rheumatology office at the time of registration prior to the rheumatologist’s evaluation although it has only been validated in RA.  In this cross sectional study of a large cohort of patients with AS, RAPID3 results had high correlations with BASDAI, BASFI, and ASDAS.  This study supports the use of the RAPID3 in RW rheumatology practices for patients with AS.

1.      Park et al. J. of Clin. Rheum. 2015;21(6):300-304.


Disclosure: S. Schwartzman, Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc., 8,Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc., 5,Abbott Immunology Pharmaceuticals, 5,Abbott Immunology Pharmaceuticals, 8,Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P., 8,Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P., 5,Pfizer Inc, 5,Pfizer Inc, 8,UCB, 5,UCB, 8,Regeneron, 5,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 8,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 5; K. Knapp, Discus Analytics, 1,Discus Analytics, 3; G. Craig, Discus Analytics LLC., 4,Celgene, 8,UCB, 8,Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc., 8,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 8,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 8,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 5,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Schwartzman S, Knapp K, Craig G. The Importance of Outcome Measures in Ankylosing Spondylitis – Validity of the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 in a Real World Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-importance-of-outcome-measures-in-ankylosing-spondylitis-validity-of-the-routine-assessment-of-patient-index-data-3-in-a-real-world-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-importance-of-outcome-measures-in-ankylosing-spondylitis-validity-of-the-routine-assessment-of-patient-index-data-3-in-a-real-world-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology