ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1514

The Impact of Renal Transplantation on Cardiovascular Events Among Patients with End-State Kidney Disease Due to Lupus Nephritis: A Nationwide Cohort Study

April Jorge1, Xiaoqing Fu2, Yuqing Zhang3, Hyon Choi4 and Zachary Wallace5, 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, 3Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 4Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Lexington, MA, 5Harvard Medical School, Boston

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Cardiovascular, Lupus nephritis, Renal

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes III: Lupus Nephritis (1512–1516)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:00PM-4:50PM

Background/Purpose:

A major complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the progression of lupus nephritis (LN) to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Both SLE and ESKD are associated with increased risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Renal transplantation improves survival among patients with LN-ESKD. We sought to assess the potential impact of renal transplantation on CVD events in LN-ESKD.

Methods:

We identified all incident cases of ESKD due to SLE (ICD9 710.0) in the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) between 2000 and 2014. The USRDS captures nearly all patients with ESKD in the US and includes the cause of ESKD by ICD9 code as well as demographics, comorbidities, and dates of waitlist entry, transplantation and death including the cause of death. Hospitalizations are additionally captured under Medicare Part A. We restricted our study population to patients who were waitlisted for transplant to limit the potential bias of confounding by indication and required Medicare enrollment. To account for time-varying variables, we performed sequential cohort matching on the basis of age, sex, and time since initiation of dialysis.We sequentially matched patients on their transplant date (index date) 1:1 with comparators who remained active on the waitlist on that date. Follow-up began at the date of transplant or matching and ended at the time of death, end of Medicare coverage, three years following the index date, transplantation (control group only, at which point a participant would be matched and begin follow-up time in the transplant group), or January 1, 2015, whichever came first. The outcomes of interest were CVD events, including non-fatal and fatal myocardial infarctions (MI) and non-fatal and fatal cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). We determined CVD event rates in the groups that did and did not have transplants, accounting for competing risk of death, and calculated hazard ratios (HRs) using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, additionally adjusting for race/ethnicity, time on waitlist, first ESKD treatment modality, ESKD-specific comorbidity score, Organ Procurement and Transplant Network region, and history of any organ transplant.

Results:

We identified 1,250 patients who had a transplant and 1,250 matched comparators. These groups were well-balanced by age, sex, time since initiation of dialysis, and time since entry onto the waitlist (Table 1). Over mean 2.26 years of follow up, 24 patients who had a transplant and 68 who did not have a transplant had a CVD event, yielding CVD event rates of 7.2 per 1000 person-years and 29.6 per 1000 person-years, respectively (HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.51-0.61]) (Table 2). After adjustment for covariates, the HR was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.50- 0.60). The findings were similar within subgroups by age, sex, and African American race. The adjusted HRs were 0.54 (95% CI, 0.50-0.59) for MI and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.50-0.59) for CVA.

Conclusion:

In this nationwide study of ESKD due to LN, renal transplantation was associated with a reduced risk of CVD events, including MI and CVA. Our findings highlight the importance of identifying barriers to transplantation in this population, as improved access could reduce CVD morbidity and mortality.

Table 1. Characteristics of Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease Due to Lupus Nephritis, Transplanted and Matched Comparators

Table 2. Cardiovascular Events According to Transplant Status Among Matched Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease Due to Lupus Nephritis


Disclosure: A. Jorge, None; X. Fu, None; Y. Zhang, None; H. Choi, AstraZeneca, 2, Takeda, 5, Selecta, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Horizon, 5; Z. Wallace, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jorge A, Fu X, Zhang Y, Choi H, Wallace Z. The Impact of Renal Transplantation on Cardiovascular Events Among Patients with End-State Kidney Disease Due to Lupus Nephritis: A Nationwide Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-renal-transplantation-on-cardiovascular-events-among-patients-with-end-state-kidney-disease-due-to-lupus-nephritis-a-nationwide-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-renal-transplantation-on-cardiovascular-events-among-patients-with-end-state-kidney-disease-due-to-lupus-nephritis-a-nationwide-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology