ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0607

The Evolution of Rheumatologist’s Practice in Response to the COVID19 Pandemic

Maria Bacalao1, Kathryn Dao2 and John Cush2, 1UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX, 2University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, Biologicals, COVID-19, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), quality of care

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Health Services Research Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The COVID19 pandemic was a turning point for Rheumatology. This survey of rheumatologists (rheums) assessed its impact on care delivery, patient counseling and drug use in the first 3 months of the pandemic.

Methods: 2406 rheums were surveyed by email in June 2020. The 26 questions assessed respondent demographics, geography, practice type, care delivery, counseling, risks and prevalence of COVID in rheumatic disease (RMD) patients (pts).

Results: 400 responses (16.7%) were received. Average respondent age was 54 yrs, 61% male, in practice for 21 years, avg 67 pts seen per week;  most were in private practice (group 27%, solo 27%, multispecialty 22%) or academics (24%). 5% of respondents practiced outside the US.

Care Delivery:  Figure 1 shows substantial reductions in number of new pt visits (64%), hospital consults (56%), follow-ups visits (55%), joint injections (55%), urgent (49%) and research visits (42%).  Major service increases were seen in telehealth ( >75%) visits. Many noted < 20% patients had no telemedicine access. Rheums temporarily closed their clinics, for either 4 weeks (32%), 6-8wks (28%) or 12 wks (14%); 19% have still not reopened. A major disruption to practice was noted by 46% rheums; 4% had no change. A major income loss was claimed by 31%, and 17% had no income loss.

Patient Counseling: 40% rheums noted ongoing patient confusion about COVID. Two-thirds informed pts their disease does NOT increase COVID risk. RA & SLE pts were told risk is not higher if they are well controlled on stable meds (27%) or that risk was due to comorbidities & age (21%); rather than meds (9%). Majority noted no COVID risk imposed by NSAIDs (93%), OA (92%), HCQ (91%), MTX (69%), abatacept (64%) or inflammatory arthritis (63%).  Rheums suggested an increased risk with rituximab (55%), immunosuppressives (49%) or active autoimmune disease (47%).  Rheums perceptions of COVID risk are shown in Figure 2. 

Prescribing Habits: Overall, rheums did not change their use of NSAIDs, MTX, HCQ, TNF inhibitors abatacept, IL-6 inhibitors, or MMF. Prednisone use decreased 41%, as did rituximab 26%, cyclophosphamide 19% and denosumab 18%; antidepressants (9%) and hydroxychloroquine (7%) increased. Nearly all rheums (94%) said <25% of patients reduced or discontinued meds without seeking advice.  10% prescribed antimalarials as COVID prophylaxis, and 82% of rheums reported patients had difficulty getting antimalarials (shortages/cost issues). 

Rheums Role: Most (61%) have not been involved in COVID-19 care, while 30% were consulted about DMARD/biologics; only 6% have managed cytokine storm (CSS).  The preferred agent for CSS was IL-6 inhibitor (66%), and 14% did not know what to use.  A total of 348 rheums reported 875 cases of COVID, (2.51 patients/Rheum).  With an average Rheum patient panel of 1350 patients, the COVID infection rate was 0.18% in RMD pts. Total of 52 deaths were reported, with a COVID death rate of 0.01% in RMD patients.

Conclusion: Rheums substantially changed their practices, counseling and health care delivery during the pandemic. COVID infection and death rates among RMD patients appears to be lower than the general US population. Maintenance of drug therapy and patient compliance appears potentially protective to SARS-CoV-2.


Disclosure: M. Bacalao, None; K. Dao, None; J. Cush, AbbVie, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Genentech, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, Amgen, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Gilead, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, UCB, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bacalao M, Dao K, Cush J. The Evolution of Rheumatologist’s Practice in Response to the COVID19 Pandemic [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-evolution-of-rheumatologists-practice-in-response-to-the-covid19-pandemic/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-evolution-of-rheumatologists-practice-in-response-to-the-covid19-pandemic/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology