ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • Search
  • My Favorites
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all favorites

Abstract Number: 278

The Effect of Patient, Prescriber and Region on the Initiation of First Biologic for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Longitudinal Population Study

Mark Tatangelo1, George A. Tomlinson2, Michael Paterson3, Nick Bansback4, Tara Gomes1, Alex Kopp3, Vandana Ahluwalia5 and Claire Bombardier6, 1University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4St Paul's Hospital, Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5Ontario Rheumatology Association, Brampton, ON, Canada, 6Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2018

Keywords: administrative databases, appropriateness, Clinical research methods, health disparities and population studies

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Prescribing the first biologic for rheumatoid arthritis is an important decision for physicians, payers, and patients with costs and clinical implications. Our aim was to describe disparities in access to the first biologic prescribed to patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a single payer health care system (no insurance confounders) to explain the relative contributions of patient, prescriber and geographic region characteristics to receipt of first biologic.

Methods:

Our study design is a population retrospective administrative data-based population study conducted in Ontario Canada. We used a time-series analysis to describe trends in rheumatologist preference and nested Cox proportional hazards models with random effects and time varying exposures to adjust for patient, physician and geographic area characteristics. Patients had an incident RA diagnosis between 2001 to 2015 after 66 years of age in Ontario Canada and received at least one csDMARD or biologic. The main exposure was time from the first csDMARD prescription to the outcome of first biologic prescription, adjusted for patient, prescriber and geographic area variables. Patient covariates were age, sex, disease duration, socioeconomic status, distance to care and supply of care in the patient’s area of residence. Prescriber covariates were year of graduation, specialty of practice, and the supply of rheumatologic care in the patient’s geographic region. Patients were censored at death, move out of province or end of study follow-up.

Results:

A total of 17,672 patients met the study inclusion criteria accruing 82,445.79 patient-years of follow up. Variables significantly associated with delayed receipt of first biologic medication, were older age, sex (male) (HR=0.76), lower socioeconomic status (HR=0.92), greater distance to nearest rheumatologist (HR=0.95). Rheumatologist preference for and use of biologics increased 2.5-fold in the study time period but have not kept pace with the number of new active RA patients (3 fold). Geographic area level differences in time to prescriptions of first biologic exists and widens over time with about a 10% difference from highest to lowest prescribing regions 2 years after first csDMARD prescription (Figure 1). Prescriber preference (after adjustment for patient and physician covariates) accounted for 65% of prescription variation while differences between the regions themselves contributed 4.6% to the overall prescription variation.

Conclusion:

From a direct measurement of the total Provincial population of RA patients with identical medication coverage, variation in time to receipt of first biologic exist after adjusting for individual level patient, prescriber, and geographic area covariates. These findings illustrate systemic gaps in care and the influence of physician preferences that could be further optimized to improve patient outcomes.


Disclosure: M. Tatangelo, None; G. A. Tomlinson, None; M. Paterson, None; N. Bansback, None; T. Gomes, None; A. Kopp, None; V. Ahluwalia, None; C. Bombardier, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tatangelo M, Tomlinson GA, Paterson M, Bansback N, Gomes T, Kopp A, Ahluwalia V, Bombardier C. The Effect of Patient, Prescriber and Region on the Initiation of First Biologic for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Longitudinal Population Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-patient-prescriber-and-region-on-the-initiation-of-first-biologic-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-longitudinal-population-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2018

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-patient-prescriber-and-region-on-the-initiation-of-first-biologic-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-longitudinal-population-study/

Advanced Search

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology