ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0929

The Effect of Mycophenolate Mofetil on Pulmonary Function Tests in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease, and the Difference Between the African Americans versus Non-African Americans

Afroditi Boulougoura1, Shannon Lance2, Duncan Moore3, Haijun Wang4, Julio Huapaya5 and Virginia Steen3, 1Department of Internal Medicine, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA., Washington, DC, 2Department of Internal Medicine, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA., Washington, 3Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, 4MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA, Washington, 5Department of Critical Care Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA., Bethesda

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: interstitial lung disease, race/ethnicity, Scleroderma, Systemic

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is a pulmonary fibrosing disorder characterized by systemic inflammation and progressive scarring of the lungs that leads to respiratory failure. Previous studies have shown that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can be beneficial in SSc-ILD. The majority of studies characterizing patients with ILD and evaluating survival have been conducted in populations with a Caucasian predominance. The objectives of the current study were to explore the role of MMF in the treatment of SSc-ILD, and examine whether racial differences influence response to treatment, specifically between African Americans (AAs) and Non-African Americans (Non-AAs).

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective study of patients with SSc-ILD that were seen at our institution since 2008, treated with MMF (target dose 1500 mg bid) and had documented PFTs at least once prior to MMF initiation. PFTs at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 months after initiation of MMF were also documented. Baseline characteristics as well as PFTs were compared using t-test. A regression analysis was used to compare the trend of FVC% predicted, TLC% predicted and DLCO% predicted before and after MMF treatment, as well as to compare AAs and Non-AAs.

Results: Sixty-eight patients were included of which 38 (55.8%) were AAs. The median age in AAs and Non-AAs was 44 (IQR 13.5) and 46 (IQR 15.1), respectively (Table 1). The AA group had a higher female percentage, slightly but not significantly longer disease duration at first PFTs and no significant difference in anti-nuclear antibodies subtypes compared to Non-AA group. Prior to MMF initiation, the average FVC% predicted was 63.2 (± 1.9) for the entire cohort, with AAs having a statistically significant lower baseline than non-AAs (59.8 ± 2.3 vs. 67.7 ± 2.7, p=0.02). The trend change in FVC% predicted pre- and post- treatment was significant in both groups (+3.8 (SE 1.0), p=0.0002 in AAs and +5.2 (SE 1.1), p < .0001 in non-AAs) with significant stabilization of FVC% predicted after initiation of MMF (Figure 1). The difference in the trend change between the AA and non-AA group was not statistically significant. There was no significant trend change in TLC% predicted and DLCO% predicted, although the AA group showed an insignificant decrease in both values post- MMF compared to non-AA that showed an increase (p >0.05).

Conclusion: MMF can significantly slow the decrease in FVC% predicted in patients with SSc-ILD in both AAs and non-AAs. The main difference in our population was the significantly lower FVC in our AA patients at the start of MMF. It is critical to identify patients with ILD as early as possible to initiate treatment and prevent further deterioration. This is particularly true in AAs.


Disclosure: A. Boulougoura, None; S. Lance, None; D. Moore, None; H. Wang, None; J. Huapaya, None; V. Steen, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, corbus, 2, 5, eicos, 2, 5, genetech, 2, forbius, 5, galapagos, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Boulougoura A, Lance S, Moore D, Wang H, Huapaya J, Steen V. The Effect of Mycophenolate Mofetil on Pulmonary Function Tests in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease, and the Difference Between the African Americans versus Non-African Americans [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-mycophenolate-mofetil-on-pulmonary-function-tests-in-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis-associated-interstitial-lung-disease-and-the-difference-between-the-african-americans-versus-non-af/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-mycophenolate-mofetil-on-pulmonary-function-tests-in-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis-associated-interstitial-lung-disease-and-the-difference-between-the-african-americans-versus-non-af/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology