ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1801

The Effect of Ixekizumab versus Adalimumab on Individual Components of the ACR Composite Score, with and Without Concomitant Methotrexate or Other Conventional Synthetic DMARDs at 52 Weeks in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis

Elaine Husni1, Sona Kamat2, Keri Stenger3, Rebecca Bolce3, Thorsten Holzkaemper4, Cameron Helt3, So Young Park3, Jeffrey Lisse5 and Luca Idolazzi6, 1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 2St Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, 3Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 4Eli Lilly and Company, Bad Homburg, Germany, 5Eli Lilly and Company, Tucson, AZ, 6University of Verona, Verona, Italy

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: American College of Rheumatology Criteria, autoimmune diseases, clinical trial, Intervention, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Treatment Poster III: Psoriatic Arthritis II (1801–1835)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: It is important to understand how to select among the multiple treatment options for active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Since individual patient domains may influence treatment choice, it is useful to evaluate individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) components in large trials. SPIRIT-H2H showed superiority of ixekizumab (IXE) over adalimumab (ADA) in patients with PsA and inadequate response (IR) to conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) [1]. This analysis describes the effect of IXE and ADA on individual ACR components at week (Wk) 52, with and without concomitant methotrexate (MTX) and csDMARDs.

Methods: Patients from SPIRIT-H2H (NCT03151551, 52 Wk randomized multicenter study) who met Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) (N=566), were randomized (1:1, stratified by baseline concomitant csDMARDs and moderate-to-severe PsO) to IXE or ADA on-label PsA or PsO dosing. Patients were bDMARD-naïve with IR to csDMARDs, active PsA (≥3 tender joints [TJC] and ≥3 swollen joints [SJC]) and had psoriasis (PsO) ≥3% BSA (body surface area). Patient’s Global Assessment (PtGA) and Physicians Global Assessment (PGA), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and joint pain were assessed by visual analog scale, and TJC and SJC as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) were analyzed. All post-hoc analyses were performed on the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Change from baseline (CFB) in individual ACR components was analyzed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model, for overall as well as with and without concomitant therapies (e.g., MTX or csDMARD). Least square mean (LSM) and standard error (SE) are presented. Missing data were imputed using modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF). Nine patients with active PsO and BSA ≥3% were assessed as Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)=0 at baseline, a medical inconsistency that was resolved using medical judgment. These patients were considered PASI100 responders if PASI =0 and BSA =0 at post baseline visits.

Results: A total of 566 patients received either IXE (N=283) or ADA (N=283). Baseline values for individual ACR components were balanced between IXE and ADA (Table). At Wk 52, IXE demonstrated efficacy across all individual ACR components in the ITT population, specifically in PGA, PtGA and Joint Pain; ADA also demonstrated numerical efficacy (Fig. A). Improvements from baseline for IXE were observed across ACR components, with or without MTX or csDMARD (Fig. B-E). The effect of MTX (with or without) was notably different between IXE and ADA in TJC68, PGA, Joint Pain, and PtGA.

Conclusion: In this analysis, there was improvement with IXE in all components of the ACR composite score at Wk 52, irrespective of MTX or csDMARD use (with or without). In the ITT population, IXE showed comparable efficacy to ADA at Wk 52 in all components of ACR, demonstrating improvement across musculoskeletal domains. These results may provide further confidence of the clinical benefits of ixekizumab across musculoskeletal domains in patients with PsA, regardless of MTX or csDMARD use.

  1. Mease PJ. et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79(1)

Data presented as mean (SD) unless otherwise specified. Abbreviations: ADA, adalimumab; CRP, C-reactive protein; HAQ-DI, health assessment questionnaire disability index; ITT, intent-to-treat; IXE, ixekizumab; PGA, physicians’ global assessment, PtGA, patients global assessment; Q2W, every two weeks; Q4W, every four weeks; SJC, swollen joint count; TJC, tender joint count.

Change from baseline in the individual components of the ACR composite score at week 52 in patients treated with IXE or ADA (A) in the ITT population, (B and C) with and without MTX use at baseline and (D and E) with and without csDMARD use at baseline. Data presented as least square mean (LSM) change from baseline (mBOCF) + SE. Abbreviations: ACR, American College of Rheumatology; ADA, adalimumab; CRP, C-reactive protein; csDMARD, conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drug; HAQ-DI, health assessment questionnaire disability index; ITT, intent-to-treat; IXE, ixekizumab; mBOCF, modified baseline observation carried forward; MTX, methotrexate; PGA, physicians global assessment, PtGA, patients global assessment; Q2W, every two weeks; Q4W, every four weeks; SJC, swollen joint count; TJC, tender joint count.


Disclosures: E. Husni, AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, Janssen, 2, Novartis, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, UCB, 2, Regeneron, 2; S. Kamat, Abbvie, 2, 6, Eli Lilly and Company, 6, Amgen, 6; K. Stenger, Eli Lilly and Company, 3, 11; R. Bolce, Eli Lilly and Company, 3, 11; T. Holzkaemper, Eli Lilly, 3, 12, Shareholder; C. Helt, Eli Lilly and Company, 3, 11; S. Park, Eli Lilly and Company, 3, 11; J. Lisse, Eli Lilly and Company, 3, 11; L. Idolazzi, Eli Lilly and Company, 6, UCB, 6, Celgene, 6, MSD, 6, Abbvie, 6, Novartis, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Husni E, Kamat S, Stenger K, Bolce R, Holzkaemper T, Helt C, Park S, Lisse J, Idolazzi L. The Effect of Ixekizumab versus Adalimumab on Individual Components of the ACR Composite Score, with and Without Concomitant Methotrexate or Other Conventional Synthetic DMARDs at 52 Weeks in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-ixekizumab-versus-adalimumab-on-individual-components-of-the-acr-composite-score-with-and-without-concomitant-methotrexate-or-other-conventional-synthetic-dmards-at-52-weeks-in-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-ixekizumab-versus-adalimumab-on-individual-components-of-the-acr-composite-score-with-and-without-concomitant-methotrexate-or-other-conventional-synthetic-dmards-at-52-weeks-in-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology