ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 468

The Differential Role Of T Helper Cells In The Pathogenesis and Responsiveness To Abatacept Therapy In Rheumatoid Arthritis

Shunsuke Fukuyo1, Shingo Nakayamada2, Kunihiro Yamaoka1, Satoshi Kubo1, Shigeru Iwata3, Kazuyoshi Saito1 and Yoshiya Tanaka1, 1The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan, 2First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan, 3The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Abatacept, Anti-CCP antibodies and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Disease Activity, T cells

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Abatacept (ABT) works through a different mechanism of action from TNF inhibitors in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). ABT decreases T cell responses by limiting CD28 mediated signaling that is required for T cell activation and differentiation. However, little is known about T cell populations targeted by ABT. We investigated the relevance of the phenotype of CD4+ helper T cells to disease activity in patients with RA and responsiveness to treatment, elucidating targets to ABT.

Methods: Heparinized whole blood samples were obtained from 19 patients with RA and 15 healthy donors (HD). All patients were treated with ABT at baseline, week 2 and every 4 weeks, and blood samples were taken at baseline and week 24 after treatment. The phenotype of T cells was determined by flow cytometry and the results were correlated with the clinical disease activity with simplified disease activity index (SDAI), disease activity score based on 28 joints and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 (ESR)), anti- cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody and rheumatoid factor (RF).

Results: The proportion of CD28– cells among CD4+ cells increased in RA, compared to HD (p=0.04). Baseline levels of CD28 on CD4+ cells have positively correlated with DAS28 (p=0.00) and SDAI (p=0.03) at baseline as well as‡™DAS28 (p=0.0115) and ‡™SDAI (p=0.0574) in response to ABT for 24 weeks. By contrast, baseline proportion of CD4+CD28– cells was higher in patients who failed to achieve a remission at 24 week after treatment. The proportion of CD4+ CXCR5+ Tfh (p=0.00) and CD4+CXCR3+ Th1 (p=0.08) cells increased in RA compared to HD. Those cells also expressed active surface markers such as CD38. CD4+CD28+ cells consisted of activated Tfh and Th1 in naïve and central memory phase: the proportion of Tfh cells increased in anti-CCP antibody-positive patients (p=0.05), whereas that of Th1 cells tended to be correlated with disease activity (p=0.07). CD4+CD28– cells consisted of Th1 in effector memory phase, showing no correlation to disease activity and antibody production. Finally, the proportion of Tfh cells was significantly decreased after ABT treatment (p=0.03), but those of Th1 cells was not changed (p=0.26).

Conclusion: These results imply that CD4+CD28+ cells, which consist of Tfh cells in central memory phase associated with production of anti-CCP, are target of ABT, whereas CD4+CD28– cells, which consist of terminally differentiated Th1 cells, might be associated with refractoriness to ABT therapy. The evaluation of T cell phenotype may serve to predict to the response to ABT therapy in advance in patients with RA.


Disclosure:

S. Fukuyo,
None;

S. Nakayamada,
None;

K. Yamaoka,
None;

S. Kubo,
None;

S. Iwata,
None;

K. Saito,
None;

Y. Tanaka,

BMS, MSD, Chugai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Astellas, Abbvie, Daiichi-Sankyo,

2,

UCB, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Abbott, Abbvie, Eisai, Chugai, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Quintiles, MSD, Asahi Kasei,

8,

UCB, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Abbott, Abbvie, Eisai, Chugai, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Quintiles, MSD, Asahi Kasei,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-differential-role-of-t-helper-cells-in-the-pathogenesis-and-responsiveness-to-abatacept-therapy-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology