ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1238

The Development of the Lupus Foundation of America—Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus (LFA-REAL™) Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) to Evaluate Lupus Disease Activity

Anca Askanase1, Samantha Nguyen2, Miya Okado2, Nancy Leidy3 and Joan T. Merrill4, 1Rheumatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 2Rheumatology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, 3Evidera, Bethesda, MD, 4Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Disease Activity, Lupus, Outcome measures, patient outcomes and qualitative

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The LFA REALTM is designed as two complimentary disease activity measures in order to integrate clinician and patient input. The current report updates progress of the LFA REALTM patient-reported outcome (PRO).

Methods: The PRO was developed in accordance with FDA guidance. After preliminary concept identification work, a qualitative study was performed with 25 adult participants with SLE, including 10 who participated in concept elicitation (Phase 1) and 15 for cognitive debriefing interviews (Phase 2). A semi-structured guide was employed by trained interviewers. Qualitative data were analyzed using ATLAS.ti software v7.5. A coding dictionary was developed based on the interview guide and concepts of interest. At the completion of the interviews, participants completed the draft PRO and measures to characterize the sample (SF-36, socio-demographic, clinical data questionnaires).

Results: Mean age of participants was 45.6 [22-69], 88% were female and all had SLE diagnosis confirmed by their rheumatologists. The mean SF-36 physical component score (PCS) for the sample was 29.8 (±9.1), and mental component scores MCS was 46.4 (±11.6). Phase 1 elicited symptom saturation (detailed in Table 1) and mapping of the draft PRO while Phase 2 debriefed instructions, items, response options for content clarity, comprehensiveness and content validity of the draft PRO. With a recall period of 4 weeks, the PRO asks patients to evaluate their overall progress and severity of symptoms associated with current lupus activity along a series of visual analogue scales. Instructions are brief and guide the patient to active as opposed to longstanding symptoms that are more likely due to damage. The PRO allows for global, organ-based or symptom specific disease assessments from the patient’s perspective.

Conclusion: Results of this qualitative study address the content validity of the LFA-REAL PRO. As expected, fatigue or tiredness was spontaneously reported by 90% of patients. 100% of patients spontaneously brought up arthritis, which may be more important to this group than previously estimated and substantiates the approach to break down arthritis into joint pain, stiffness and swelling in this PRO. Shortness of breath and fever was also more common than expected. Quantitative validation of the PRO will be performed to characterize the psychometric properties of the PRO against other PROs used in lupus trials. After validation, the LFA-REAL system is intended for clinical practice and clinical trial use.


Disclosure: A. Askanase, None; S. Nguyen, None; M. Okado, None; N. Leidy, Evidera PPD, 3; J. T. Merrill, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Askanase A, Nguyen S, Okado M, Leidy N, Merrill JT. The Development of the Lupus Foundation of America—Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus (LFA-REAL™) Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) to Evaluate Lupus Disease Activity [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-development-of-the-lupus-foundation-of-america-rapid-evaluation-of-activity-in-lupus-lfa-real-patient-reported-outcome-pro-to-evaluate-lupus-disease-activity/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-development-of-the-lupus-foundation-of-america-rapid-evaluation-of-activity-in-lupus-lfa-real-patient-reported-outcome-pro-to-evaluate-lupus-disease-activity/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology